The “credit crunch”; “Too big to fail”.
Excerpted from Classic Liberals post to the discussion thread
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ences-of-eliminating-the-federal-minimum-wage. :
“Government just fucks up what would otherwise be a perfect system!
Government causes unemployment and inflation, prohibits freedom and mandates fucking stupidity and perpetuates disincentive and enslaves the poor to reliance on idiot government!”
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Within my lifetime thus far there has occurred some catastrophic events that brought the most severe harm upon our nation’s and our global economy They were not due primarily to government intervention but rather to government officials failures to exercise due diligence and exercise their legally mandated duty to reign in private enterprises’ excesses. The last such fiasco was described as the “credit crunch”. You might better recall the phrase “Too big to fail”.
“Too big to fail” refers to the consequences of huge enterprises legally subject extremely great loses that also are themselves significantly detrimental to our national economy.
I believe all such USA cases were due to the corporation’s imprudence and/or illegal activity and/or government regulators or legislators failing to exercise due diligence and oversight, and/or undue influence of lobbyists.
[It doesn’t help when our legislators act unintelligently. Commercial interests were granted the opportunity to participate within government sponsored entities in order to increase the pool of available wealth for federally insured loans; that worked well. Commercial participants were able to be represented on the GSEs’ boards; that was reasonable.
GSEs’ were then permitted to deal with loans or portions of loans that were not federally insured; thus GSEs’ were indirectly exposing the federal government to increased risks. That’s less than intelligent. The underlying cause of that foolishness might have been unstated confidence that home values can only increase and never decrease.
[Banks were permitted to sell 100% of a loan to a GSE before the signatures initializing those loans were dry. In such cases, and/or in the cases of federally insured loans, banks were unconcerned with the possibility of overvalued collateral or the creditability of the lender because the banks had “no skin in the game”].
Respectfully, Supposn
Excerpted from Classic Liberals post to the discussion thread
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ences-of-eliminating-the-federal-minimum-wage. :
“Government just fucks up what would otherwise be a perfect system!
Government causes unemployment and inflation, prohibits freedom and mandates fucking stupidity and perpetuates disincentive and enslaves the poor to reliance on idiot government!”
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Within my lifetime thus far there has occurred some catastrophic events that brought the most severe harm upon our nation’s and our global economy They were not due primarily to government intervention but rather to government officials failures to exercise due diligence and exercise their legally mandated duty to reign in private enterprises’ excesses. The last such fiasco was described as the “credit crunch”. You might better recall the phrase “Too big to fail”.
“Too big to fail” refers to the consequences of huge enterprises legally subject extremely great loses that also are themselves significantly detrimental to our national economy.
I believe all such USA cases were due to the corporation’s imprudence and/or illegal activity and/or government regulators or legislators failing to exercise due diligence and oversight, and/or undue influence of lobbyists.
[It doesn’t help when our legislators act unintelligently. Commercial interests were granted the opportunity to participate within government sponsored entities in order to increase the pool of available wealth for federally insured loans; that worked well. Commercial participants were able to be represented on the GSEs’ boards; that was reasonable.
GSEs’ were then permitted to deal with loans or portions of loans that were not federally insured; thus GSEs’ were indirectly exposing the federal government to increased risks. That’s less than intelligent. The underlying cause of that foolishness might have been unstated confidence that home values can only increase and never decrease.
[Banks were permitted to sell 100% of a loan to a GSE before the signatures initializing those loans were dry. In such cases, and/or in the cases of federally insured loans, banks were unconcerned with the possibility of overvalued collateral or the creditability of the lender because the banks had “no skin in the game”].
Respectfully, Supposn