The cut taxes, cut programs mantra isn't working

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
A bipartisan poll conducted for the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and the Los Angeles Times found that 64% of registered voters would be willing to pay higher taxes to boost funding for public schools.

In municipal elections held throughout California on Nov. 8, voters approved 41 of 53 local tax, fee and bond measures, many of which required a two-thirds majority to pass.

"We can't wait for the marketplace to start solving our problems," said Josh Pechthalt, president of the California Federation of Teachers, which is pushing for a tax on millionaires to help fund K-12 education, state universities and public safety. "We have to have government move forward now to make sure our bridges are not collapsing and we're getting adequate funding for education."

Other proposals would ask voters to pay sales taxes on services and effectively raise levies on out-of-state companies that do business in California but maintain their workforces and offices elsewhere.

Tax advocates, including Gov.Jerry Brown, are hoping California's ongoing fiscal crisis will help their cause as the state braces for more service cuts.

In Riverside, for instance, voters renewed an expiring $19 parcel tax for the next decade to help fund library services. The measure, expected to generate $1.4 million a year, represents a quarter of the city's library budget. Demand, officials said, has been surging in the economic downturn.

In Oakdale, a town of roughly 19,000 near Yosemite National Park, voters passed a half-cent sales tax this month to maintain fire and police staffing as the city pares the rest of its workforce.

A proposal being assembled by the Think Long Committee, a group of political insiders and civic-minded billionaires, would raise taxes by as much as $10 billion a year. The money, which would largely be generated by a sales tax on services, would go directly to schools, universities and local governments.



http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-taxes-20111126,0,2599336.story
 
A bipartisan poll conducted for the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and the Los Angeles Times found that 64% of registered voters would be willing to pay higher taxes to boost funding for public schools.

In municipal elections held throughout California on Nov. 8, voters approved 41 of 53 local tax, fee and bond measures, many of which required a two-thirds majority to pass.

"We can't wait for the marketplace to start solving our problems," said Josh Pechthalt, president of the California Federation of Teachers, which is pushing for a tax on millionaires to help fund K-12 education, state universities and public safety. "We have to have government move forward now to make sure our bridges are not collapsing and we're getting adequate funding for education."

Other proposals would ask voters to pay sales taxes on services and effectively raise levies on out-of-state companies that do business in California but maintain their workforces and offices elsewhere.

Tax advocates, including Gov.Jerry Brown, are hoping California's ongoing fiscal crisis will help their cause as the state braces for more service cuts.

In Riverside, for instance, voters renewed an expiring $19 parcel tax for the next decade to help fund library services. The measure, expected to generate $1.4 million a year, represents a quarter of the city's library budget. Demand, officials said, has been surging in the economic downturn.

In Oakdale, a town of roughly 19,000 near Yosemite National Park, voters passed a half-cent sales tax this month to maintain fire and police staffing as the city pares the rest of its workforce.

A proposal being assembled by the Think Long Committee, a group of political insiders and civic-minded billionaires, would raise taxes by as much as $10 billion a year. The money, which would largely be generated by a sales tax on services, would go directly to schools, universities and local governments.



http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-taxes-20111126,0,2599336.story

I did a Google on "parcel tax" and found this. It found it quite humorous.

"Elections to vote on parcel tax measures must take place on what are known as "established election dates." In even-numbered years, these are in March, April and November. In odd-numbered years, these are in March, June and November. However, if the election will be held by mail only, the election dates can also be set in May or August (odd or even years) and June (even-numbered years)."
http://www.ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Parcel_tax

Sounds like a comedy skit. :lol:
 
The people who've lost homes, retirement funds and jobs aren't laughing at the GOP 'tax cut/spending cuts' joke, are they?
 
Taxes are wonderful sticks which contain so many meanings, and so many different meanings, the word, concept, idea blends perfectly into the single reason why. No need to explain or think, just say 'taxes are (fill-in),' and you have answered and supported every positive and negative in the political universe. Imagine any thoughtful human signing a pledge to never do something that been done since our founding and you quickly realize brain washing works.

"There is no historical evidence that tax cuts spur economic growth. The highest period of growth in U.S. history (1933-1973) also saw its highest tax rates on the rich: 70 to 91 percent. During this period, the general tax rate climbed as well, but it reached a plateau in 1969, and growth slowed down five years later. Almost all rich nations have higher general taxes than the U.S., and they are growing faster as well." Tax cuts spur economic growth
The Idolatry of Ideology-Why Tax Cuts Hurt the Economy by Russ Beaton
Spending Cuts Vs. Tax Increases at the State Level, 10/30/01
The rich get rich because of their merit.

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?29207-Taxes-Taxes-Taxes

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?27455-Rich-And-Poor-Jobs-And-Wages

"A final word on politics. As in economics nothing is certain save the certainty that there will be firm prediction by those who do not know. It is possible that in some election, near or far, a presidential candidate will emerge in the United States determined to draw into the campaign those not now impelled to vote. Conceivably those so attracted - those who are not threatened by higher taxes and who are encouraged by the vision of a new governing community committed to the rescue of the cities and the impacted underclass - could outnumber those lost because of the resulting invasion of contentment. If this happens the effort would succeed." John Kenneth Galbraith 'The Culture of Contentment'
 
The people who've lost homes, retirement funds and jobs aren't laughing at the GOP 'tax cut/spending cuts' joke, are they?

Naturally! Which is why no republican should ever be allowed to hold office ever again.
 
Back
Top