I get so tired of the leftist hypocrites when they whine about Trump attacking judges while doing even worse with their own despicable lie filled narratives.
The Democratic Party’s hypocritical war on judges
When is a judge “brilliant” and “impeccably fair,” and when is a judge a “wacko,” “prima donna,” “right-wing hack”? When is questioning a judge’s decision a threat “to our entire system of government,” and when is it an acceptable effort to “uphold the Constitution”?
If you are a Democrat, the answer is easy: judges appointed by Democrats to hear charges against Republicans are brilliant and fair and any criticism they receive is an attack on democracy. If it is a Republican judge presiding over a case, all attacks are fair game, be they personal or professional in nature.
This double standard has been especially stark when looking at the disparate treatments of Judge Aileen Cannon in former President Donald Trump’s classified documents trial and Judge Juan Merchan in the former president’s hush money trial.
Cannon, who was selected randomly to hear special counsel Jack Smith’s case on obstruction of justice and classified documents, has been attacked constantly by Democrats and has received constant negative coverage in the media. The goal of the charges was always to get a guilty verdict before Election Day. Punishing Trump after November serves no political purpose.
It is not Cannon’s fault that charges brought by Smith under the Classified Information Procedures Act require special security procedures which have slowed the case and raised unique issues which required extensive litigation. Smith could have just brought a simple obstruction of justice charge against Trump, but that wouldn’t have delivered the headlines Democrats are looking for.
www.washingtonexaminer.com
The Democratic Party’s hypocritical war on judges
When is a judge “brilliant” and “impeccably fair,” and when is a judge a “wacko,” “prima donna,” “right-wing hack”? When is questioning a judge’s decision a threat “to our entire system of government,” and when is it an acceptable effort to “uphold the Constitution”?
If you are a Democrat, the answer is easy: judges appointed by Democrats to hear charges against Republicans are brilliant and fair and any criticism they receive is an attack on democracy. If it is a Republican judge presiding over a case, all attacks are fair game, be they personal or professional in nature.
This double standard has been especially stark when looking at the disparate treatments of Judge Aileen Cannon in former President Donald Trump’s classified documents trial and Judge Juan Merchan in the former president’s hush money trial.
Cannon, who was selected randomly to hear special counsel Jack Smith’s case on obstruction of justice and classified documents, has been attacked constantly by Democrats and has received constant negative coverage in the media. The goal of the charges was always to get a guilty verdict before Election Day. Punishing Trump after November serves no political purpose.
It is not Cannon’s fault that charges brought by Smith under the Classified Information Procedures Act require special security procedures which have slowed the case and raised unique issues which required extensive litigation. Smith could have just brought a simple obstruction of justice charge against Trump, but that wouldn’t have delivered the headlines Democrats are looking for.
![www.washingtonexaminer.com](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Merchan-Cannon-composite.webp)
The Democratic Party’s hypocritical war on judges - Washington Examiner
The Democratic Party has no problem attacking judges when it suits them politically.
![www.washingtonexaminer.com](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/cropped-favicon-32x32.png)