It was the usual climate talk, but what struck me the most was when Bernie Sanders responded to a question about population control. Without hesitation or any sense of self-awareness, Sanders offered up abortion in third world countries as a necessary and legitimate solution to overpopulation.
It was chilling.
It was chilling.
Kira Davis: Abortion Is Not a “Gift” To The Black Community
Posted at 1:30 pm on September 5, 2019
by Kira Davis
https://www.redstate.com/kiradavis/2019/09/05/kira-davis-abortion-not-gift-black-community/
Posted at 1:30 pm on September 5, 2019
by Kira Davis
https://www.redstate.com/kiradavis/2019/09/05/kira-davis-abortion-not-gift-black-community/
It should have been just as chilling when John Kerry said it:
But Kerry has gone what in better days would have been universally held to be one bridge too far. In a speech last year to the NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner, he gave an intellectually suicidal summary of his views.
He began by saying that "there is no overturning of Roe v. Wade." He went on: "There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or health." That statement of course begs the question on which the entire Congress and the state legislatures and the Supreme Court have been stalled for years, namely, Is the invocation of "health," if made by the woman alone, conclusive in authorizing abortion? If so, Roe v. Wade, which did not authorize willful third-trimester abortions, stands to be revised as the Roe-Wade-Kerry decision.
Kerry continued: "There (shall be) no more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world."
This endorses abortion Chinese-style. Too many people? Too few abortions.
But the eye-popper was still to come: "We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."
But Kerry says he personally opposes abortion. Where is he exhibiting his pride in what he stands for? Whom has he counseled against abortion? A nun somewhere, out of earshot?
He began by saying that "there is no overturning of Roe v. Wade." He went on: "There is no outlawing of a procedure necessary to save a woman's life or health." That statement of course begs the question on which the entire Congress and the state legislatures and the Supreme Court have been stalled for years, namely, Is the invocation of "health," if made by the woman alone, conclusive in authorizing abortion? If so, Roe v. Wade, which did not authorize willful third-trimester abortions, stands to be revised as the Roe-Wade-Kerry decision.
Kerry continued: "There (shall be) no more cutbacks on population control efforts around the world."
This endorses abortion Chinese-style. Too many people? Too few abortions.
But the eye-popper was still to come: "We need to honestly and confidently and candidly take this issue out to the country and we need to speak up and be proud of what we stand for."
But Kerry says he personally opposes abortion. Where is he exhibiting his pride in what he stands for? Whom has he counseled against abortion? A nun somewhere, out of earshot?
Crooked thought
William F. Buckley
February 26, 2004
http://townhall.com/columnists/williamfbuckley/2004/02/26/crooked_thought
NOTE: Black Americans vote for Roe v. Wade every time they vote for a Democrat. That is why I never understood why black Americans —— and their television mouths —— become so enraged every time a cop kills a black man in self-defense. It never bothers black Americans that Democrats already killed tens of millions of black babies in this country alone with more to come. Also note that importing millions of Third World illegal aliens is exempted from population controls.
Incidentally, overcrowding this country with millions of illegal aliens and the U.N.'s economic immigrants not only increases poverty in this country, it guaranties a never-ending source of poverty stricken peoples.
It will not be long before Democrats promote sterilizing Third World immigrants in order to satisfy the demands of population control and abortion as well as providing a never-ending source of cheap labor.
In one sense, using a few Third World countries as breeding farms for laborers one tick smarter than monkeys and robots flies in the face of population controls and abortion.
Let me close with the late Wangari Maathai (1940 - 2011). She took the prize for stupidity along with her Nobel Peace Prize. (Agent 006 & 7/8[SUP]ths[/SUP] reported that the homosexual community was pissed off when the dingbat did not include them in her HIV accusation.)
OSLO, Dec. 9 - Just a day before she is scheduled to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, the Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Maathai tried Thursday to defuse a controversy over reports that she said "evil-minded scientists" in the developed world intentionally created AIDS to decimate the African population.
Dr. Maathai, a 64-year-old biologist, whose Green Belt Movement is credited with planting millions of trees in an attempt to reforest Kenya, said that her recent statements about AIDS and H.I.V., reported in the African press, were taken out of context. She said she had meant only to pose alternative theories about the disease's origin to counter the belief by some Kenyans that AIDS was a curse from God.
Dr. Maathai, a 64-year-old biologist, whose Green Belt Movement is credited with planting millions of trees in an attempt to reforest Kenya, said that her recent statements about AIDS and H.I.V., reported in the African press, were taken out of context. She said she had meant only to pose alternative theories about the disease's origin to counter the belief by some Kenyans that AIDS was a curse from God.
Nobel Peace Laureate Seeks to Explain Remarks About AIDS
By Walter Gibbs
Dec. 10, 2004
https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/10/...eate-seeks-to-explain-remarks-about-aids.html
By Walter Gibbs
Dec. 10, 2004
https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/10/...eate-seeks-to-explain-remarks-about-aids.html
In any event, Wangari Maathai put her emphasis on black genocide when it belongs on the U.N.’s population control. Democrats/Socialists are equal opportunity butchers —— they will wipe out poor people of every color:
QUESTION: What in hell does planting trees have to do with preventing wars?
When Wangari Maathai won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004 she was identified as a “Kenyan ecologist.” I knew what a Kenyan was, but I was not sure what an ecologist did? I soon learned that stopping deforestation was another environmental con job on par with global warming.
NOTE: Wangari Maathai is credited with planting a million trees! Think about the amount of time it would take to plant a million of anything. I doubt if Johnny Appleseed had enough time to spread a million apple tree seeds around let alone plant them.
Environmental wack jobs are one thing, but Wangari should have been moved over to the screwball column when she said the West created HIV in a lab. I do not know if that unproven charge was considered by the Nobel Awards Committee along with human Rights and the evils of deforestation. I do know that if a real scientist made such a statement without proof he or she would be ostracized by fellow scientists.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?113144-Abe-Is-Pulling-A-Pearl-Harbor