The Hildebeast - consuming all the Left's oxygen?

[Big Money]

Hillary Clinton has dominated the Democratic presidential discussion like few other candidates before her.


Two years out from the Iowa caucuses, she already has a top-tier super PAC, a grassroots organizing machine, dozens of big donors ready to open their wallets, and massive support from Democratic voters.


It's unprecedented in modern politics, veteran Washington operatives agree.


But her inevitability masks a potential weakness within the Democratic Party: the lack of a deep bench of future national leaders.




http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/02/is-hillary-clinton-stunting-the-democratic-partys-development/283784/

 

[christiefan915]

"Hillary Clinton is our national Rorschach test. What you see says more about you than it does about her. Whether the inkblot depicts a menacing monster or fluffy cloud depends on your pre-existing perspective."
~Ruth Marcus

​

​

 

[Yoda]

Like Rand Paul Ted Cruz and Chris Christie take turns doing

 

[Big Money]

"Hillary Clinton is our national Rorschach test. What you see says more about you than it does about her. Whether the inkblot depicts a menacing monster or fluffy cloud depends on your pre-existing perspective." Ruth Marcus

Democrat dependence on Hillary Clinton hampers the development of a Democrat farm team.


With Clinton expected to take up so much room in the post-Obama party, is there much room for anyone else?


Parties typically develop national leaders and future candidates through the primary process.


This is especially true for Republicans, who have famously nominated the runner-up in the previous cycle's primary contests nearly every election since 1976.


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/02/is-hillary-clinton-stunting-the-democratic-partys-development/283784/