The Parasite Class Also Celebrates The 4th Of July

Flanders

Verified User
The XVI Amendment created the Parasite Class. Contemporary tax dollar parasites are worse than the cruelest human animals in Third World shit holes who prevent compassion from taking root, while XVI Amendment scum are determined to use their tax dollar incomes to destroy humanity itself.

Every tax dollar Democrat parasites get their hands on comes from the labors decent men and women need to take care of themselves and their loved ones.

Ratched-Clinton.jpg

https://betterlivingthroughbeowulf.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Ratched-Clinton.jpg

Put it in perspective by taking a hard look at Democrat Party filth and then ask yourself “Do I want to be governed by Nurse Ratchet, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Diarrhea Mouth Nancy Pelosi, Vomit Schumer, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tiaib, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, James Claiborne, John Lewis, Jerry Nadler and so on? The list is endless when you add-in unnecessary Democrat bureaucrats living on tax dollars.

The tragedy is that Democrat scum from decades ago are forgotten. The only difference between Democrats from the 1940s, ‘50s and ‘60s and today’s filth is that today’s moral lepers have access to more tax dollars than their political parasite ancestors could only dream about.

This fabulous article posted today reminded me that collectively the parasite personality was strong enough to overcome the Founding Fathers:

July 4, 2019
'Ancient Principles' Birthed the Greatest Nation the World Has Ever Known
By Trevor Thomas

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...greatest_nation_the_world_has_ever_known.html

These two historical events show that parasites began their demands for coerced charity a century before the XVI Amendment was IMPLEMENTED —— BUT NEVER RATIFIED:

In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia, James Madison stood on the floor of the House to object saying, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, 4 Annals of congress (1794)

French refugees benefitting from coerced charity was the first abuse of the public purse.

In 1813 the Roman Catholic Church shot holes in the Constitution when priests were given the confessional-privilege. In plain English, priests got the opening they needed to legitimate coerced charity incrementally. (Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists followed priests with similar protections codified by politicians.)

Priests have been a pestilence infecting mankind from the day money was invented; so I would take the privilege away from priests first. If anyone is dumb enough to tell priests anything they do not deserve protection.


The Catholic Church's practice of Confession is a sacrament of the faith, with the priest hearing confessions held to an inviolable sacramental seal, under pain of excommunication for the priest if that seal is broken. Accordingly, the law in most Western countries protects the priest hearing confessions from being compelled to testify against the penitent who admits a crime.



That accommodation of law is about to be broken in Australia. The Australian Associated Press reports:

June 14, 2018
Legal confidentiality of Catholic confession to be breached
By Thomas Lifson

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_of_catholic_confession_to_be_breeched_.html

Here is the brief article from Australia:


South Australian priests hearing confessions about child abuse will have a mandatory obligation from October to report the matter to police.

SA will become the first state to adopt the recommendation of the abuse royal commission, meaning priests face the prospect of criminal charges for failing to report child abuse revealed in confession.

"For many years priests and ministers have been obliged to report outside of confessional and we changed the law last year to be effective first of October," Attorney-General Vickie Chapman told ABC radio on Thursday.


SA to abolish church confession exemption
By Australian Associated Press
Published: 19:52 EDT, 13 June 2018 | Updated: 19:52 EDT, 13 June 2018

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/aap/article-5841847/SA-abolish-church-confession-exemption.html

NOTE: The Seal of the Confessional is a racket in every country. When Dan Rather ruled the roost at CBS he reported that priests told Soviet Communists everything they heard in the confessional in order to stay in business. So much for the Seal of the Confessional never being broken. Once the Seal is broken by one priest no priest can ever be trusted again.

Protecting the myth of the Seal’s inviolability is the reason behind so many movies about priests who hang tough. QUESTION: Did you ever see a movie or TV show where the priest character spills his guts?

NOTE:
The Fifth Amendment protects the Seal whether or not a priest is the defendant:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Let me be clear on this. The only way to enforce the First Amendment, and respect the doctrine of Separation of Church and State is to keep every religion out of the courts and out of the public purse.

I am still trying to figure out how the Fifth Amendment protects certified clerics of every stripe from revealing what a penitent said in confession.

Sensible people expect politicians to lie, while very few believe that priests also lie. Pedophile priests confessing to other priests boggles the mind.


Finally, every law herds private sector Americans towards coerced charity. That was true before the Income Tax Amendment. Ergo, the XVI Amendment is the only law that can truly be called “settled law.” Proof: The Parasite Class can live without every word in the Constitution except these 12 words:

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
 
Last edited:
The XVI Amendment created the Parasite Class. Contemporary tax dollar parasites are worse than the cruelest human animals in Third World shit holes who prevent compassion from taking root, while XVI Amendment scum are determined to use their tax dollar incomes to destroy humanity itself.

Every tax dollar Democrat parasites get their hands on comes from the labors decent men and women need to take care of themselves and their loved ones.


Put it in perspective by taking a hard look at Democrat Party filth and then ask yourself “Do I want to be governed by Nurse Ratchet, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Diarrhea Mouth Nancy Pelosi, Vomit Schumer, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tiaib, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, James Claiborne, John Lewis, Jerry Nadler and so on? The list is endless when you add-in unnecessary Democrat bureaucrats living on tax dollars.

The tragedy is that Democrat scum from decades ago are forgotten. The only difference between Democrats from the 1940s, ‘50s and ‘60s and today’s filth is that today’s moral lepers have access to more tax dollars than their political parasite ancestors could only dream about.

This fabulous article posted today reminded me that collectively the parasite personality was strong enough to overcome the Founding Fathers:

July 4, 2019
'Ancient Principles' Birthed the Greatest Nation the World Has Ever Known
By Trevor Thomas

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...greatest_nation_the_world_has_ever_known.html

These two historical events show that parasites began their demands for coerced charity a century before the XVI Amendment was IMPLEMENTED —— BUT NEVER RATIFIED:

In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia, James Madison stood on the floor of the House to object saying, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, 4 Annals of congress (1794)

French refugees benefitting from coerced charity was the first abuse of the public purse.

In 1813 the Roman Catholic Church shot holes in the Constitution when priests were given the confessional-privilege. In plain English, priests got the opening they needed to legitimate coerced charity incrementally. (Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists followed priests with similar protections codified by politicians.)

Priests have been a pestilence infecting mankind from the day money was invented; so I would take the privilege away from priests first. If anyone is dumb enough to tell priests anything they do not deserve protection.


The Catholic Church's practice of Confession is a sacrament of the faith, with the priest hearing confessions held to an inviolable sacramental seal, under pain of excommunication for the priest if that seal is broken. Accordingly, the law in most Western countries protects the priest hearing confessions from being compelled to testify against the penitent who admits a crime.



That accommodation of law is about to be broken in Australia. The Australian Associated Press reports:

June 14, 2018
Legal confidentiality of Catholic confession to be breached
By Thomas Lifson

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_of_catholic_confession_to_be_breeched_.html

Here is the brief article from Australia:


South Australian priests hearing confessions about child abuse will have a mandatory obligation from October to report the matter to police.

SA will become the first state to adopt the recommendation of the abuse royal commission, meaning priests face the prospect of criminal charges for failing to report child abuse revealed in confession.

"For many years priests and ministers have been obliged to report outside of confessional and we changed the law last year to be effective first of October," Attorney-General Vickie Chapman told ABC radio on Thursday.


SA to abolish church confession exemption
By Australian Associated Press
Published: 19:52 EDT, 13 June 2018 | Updated: 19:52 EDT, 13 June 2018

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/aap/article-5841847/SA-abolish-church-confession-exemption.html

NOTE: The Seal of the Confessional is a racket in every country. When Dan Rather ruled the roost at CBS he reported that priests told Soviet Communists everything they heard in the confessional in order to stay in business. So much for the Seal of the Confessional never being broken. Once the Seal is broken by one priest no priest can ever be trusted again.

Protecting the myth of the Seal’s inviolability is the reason behind so many movies about priests who hang tough. QUESTION: Did you ever see a movie or TV show where the priest character spills his guts?

NOTE:
The Fifth Amendment protects the Seal whether or not a priest is the defendant:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Let me be clear on this. The only way to enforce the First Amendment, and respect the doctrine of Separation of Church and State is to keep every religion out of the courts and out of the public purse.

I am still trying to figure out how the Fifth Amendment protects certified clerics of every stripe from revealing what a penitent said in confession.

Sensible people expect politicians to lie, while very few believe that priests also lie. Pedophile priests confessing to other priests boggles the mind.


Finally, every law herds private sector Americans towards coerced charity. That was true before the Income Tax Amendment. Ergo, the XVI Amendment is the only law that can truly be called “settled law.” Proof: The Parasite Class can live without every word in the Constitution except these 12 words:

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
You appear to be completely under the control of the right-wing lie machine, which has driven you insane.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You appear to be completely under the control of the right-wing lie machine, which has driven you insane.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I can recommend him a good psychologist, but they'd probably have to charge him extra.
 
Ever since 9-11-2001 I have been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-Would-Cure-The-Disease&p=2787599#post2787599

The amount of tax dollars the Parasite Class lives on far exceeds the number of Socialism’s/Communism’s true believers:


Socialism-Wiki-Commons.jpg

USEFUL IDIOT SIGN-CARRIERS


A new Pew poll documents the sharp partisan divide over socialism as Democratic presidential candidates move the party further to the left ahead of the 2020 election.

The survey, notes Andrew Malcolm at HotAir.com, found more than eight of 10 Republicans have a negative view of socialism, with nearly two-thirds having a very negative view.

The same poll, conducted April 29-May 13, shows why Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a self-described democratic socialist, and other 2020 Democratic candidates maintain popularity while vowing to eliminate private health insurance.


Pew poll confirms Democrats' love for socialism
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 07/04/2019 @ 3:14 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/pew-poll-confirms-democrats-love-for-socialism/

Socialism/Communism is a religion and should be so defined; hence, Socialists and their programs would not be entitled to tax dollars under the First Amendment. Cast aside the charge that Socialism is a religion and every Democrat parasite running for office should be asked two questions:

1. Why are you entitled to tax dollars to fund your personal belief?

2. Why should every taxpayer pay for your morality and not mine?

You appear to be completely under the control of the right-wing lie machine, which has driven you insane.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I can recommend him a good psychologist, but they'd probably have to charge him extra.

Looks like a case for massive electro-shock therapy!

They don't do that anymore. If he was that bad, he'd probably need to go to a special facility.

They do in the Mexican clinic

If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain. Anonymous

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ocialism%92s-Libraries!&p=2873962#post2873962
 
Ever since 9-11-2001 I have been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-Would-Cure-The-Disease&p=2787599#post2787599

The amount of tax dollars the Parasite Class lives on far exceeds the number of Socialism’s/Communism’s true believers:


Socialism-Wiki-Commons.jpg

USEFUL IDIOT SIGN-CARRIERS


A new Pew poll documents the sharp partisan divide over socialism as Democratic presidential candidates move the party further to the left ahead of the 2020 election.

The survey, notes Andrew Malcolm at HotAir.com, found more than eight of 10 Republicans have a negative view of socialism, with nearly two-thirds having a very negative view.

The same poll, conducted April 29-May 13, shows why Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a self-described democratic socialist, and other 2020 Democratic candidates maintain popularity while vowing to eliminate private health insurance.


Pew poll confirms Democrats' love for socialism
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 07/04/2019 @ 3:14 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/pew-poll-confirms-democrats-love-for-socialism/

Socialism/Communism is a religion and should be so defined; hence, Socialists and their programs would not be entitled to tax dollars under the First Amendment. Cast aside the charge that Socialism is a religion and every Democrat parasite running for office should be asked two questions:

1. Why are you entitled to tax dollars to fund your personal belief?

2. Why should every taxpayer pay for your morality and not mine?











If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain. Anonymous

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ocialism%92s-Libraries!&p=2873962#post2873962

Classic case of a guy bull shiting himself
 
To MASON: If so you should have no trouble explaining:
The usual delusional rightie. The right is constantly demanding tax money for their pet causes and beliefs. Most of which just result in making things worse.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Ever since 9-11-2001 I have been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-Would-Cure-The-Disease&p=2787599#post2787599

The amount of tax dollars the Parasite Class lives on far exceeds the number of Socialism’s/Communism’s true believers:


Socialism-Wiki-Commons.jpg

USEFUL IDIOT SIGN-CARRIERS


A new Pew poll documents the sharp partisan divide over socialism as Democratic presidential candidates move the party further to the left ahead of the 2020 election.

The survey, notes Andrew Malcolm at HotAir.com, found more than eight of 10 Republicans have a negative view of socialism, with nearly two-thirds having a very negative view.

The same poll, conducted April 29-May 13, shows why Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a self-described democratic socialist, and other 2020 Democratic candidates maintain popularity while vowing to eliminate private health insurance.


Pew poll confirms Democrats' love for socialism
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 07/04/2019 @ 3:14 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/pew-poll-confirms-democrats-love-for-socialism/

Socialism/Communism is a religion and should be so defined; hence, Socialists and their programs would not be entitled to tax dollars under the First Amendment. Cast aside the charge that Socialism is a religion and every Democrat parasite running for office should be asked two questions:

1. Why are you entitled to tax dollars to fund your personal belief?

2. Why should every taxpayer pay for your morality and not mine?











If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain. Anonymous

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ocialism%92s-Libraries!&p=2873962#post2873962
It's pretty clear that you must be on welfare. No one as obviously delusional as you could possibly hold down a job.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
. . . every law herds private sector Americans towards coerced charity. That was true before the Income Tax Amendment. Ergo, the XVI Amendment is the only law that can truly be called “settled law.” Proof: The Parasite Class can live without every word in the Constitution except these 12 words:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

It is not the poor, or even illegal aliens, living on welfare state programs that is killing this country. It is coerced charity in the hands of people like this guy. Note that there is only one mention of the IRS in this article:

Unfortunately, the NoVo Foundation may just be getting started in its effort to manipulate public policy, distort the marketplace, and vilify private businesses. IRS documents from 2018 show the foundation is sitting on $536 million in assets – and Warren Buffett is likely to give the foundation hundreds of millions more [tax deductions] in the coming years.


Warren Buffett’s Charities Are Making Him Richer by Funding Shady Attacks on Berkshire Hathaway Competitors
By Drew Johnson September 16, 2019

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...dy-attacks-on-berkshire-hathaway-competitors/
 
Has a Political Cult Captured America Becoming A Faux Church & State?
By Kelly OConnell
March 21, 2021

https://canadafreepress.com/article...ured-america-becoming-a-faux-church-amp-state

Filthy priests started this country on the road to theocracy:

In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 for relief of French refugees who fled from insurrection in San Domingo to Baltimore and Philadelphia, James Madison stood on the floor of the House to object saying, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." James Madison, 4 Annals of congress (1794)

French refugees benefitting from coerced charity was the first abuse of the public purse.

In 1813 the Roman Catholic Church shot holes in the Constitution when priests were given the confessional-privilege. In plain English, priests got the opening they needed to legitimate coerced charity incrementally. (Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists followed priests with similar protections codified by politicians.)

Democrats finished the job:


Ever since 9-11-2001 I have been saying that Islam should be legally defined as a political movement which it is, while Socialism/Communism should be defined as a religion which it is. In that way both are denied First Amendment protection. In short: Socialism violates the First Amendment because it is a religion implementing the tax collector’s morality, while Islam is NOT entitled to First Amendment protection because it is a political movement.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-Would-Cure-The-Disease&p=2787599#post2787599
 
Back
Top