Here's the crux of the argument:
1. In the Biblical Old Testament; killing or murder was prohibited under the civil law of the kingdom of God; it did not apply to warfare nor to state-sponsored executions
2. An atheist can be argued not not only to be a heretic or apostate - but an inferior species altogether, worthy of being called "human" only in name.
As the writings of perverse and evil atheists such as Marquis de Sade prove - the atheist is a feral beast, given over to evils such as rape, murder, sodomy, bestiality, pedophilia and the like.
Without the ordination of humanity by God; the atheist is nothing more than another animal - society frequently kills animals for the greater good of itself, therefore to kill atheists or to deprive them of any other nonsensical "rights" - whether property, equality, or otherwise - is not a crime, nor even necessarily a sin.
In order for the atheist to attain human rights, all he needs to do is convert to Christianity or any other monotheistic faith - if he refuses, then he deserves no recognition of humanity, being worthy only of death. Stealing or other acts of aggression against an atheist is not a sin at all either - for if it is in greater good of God's kingdom to seize the property of the atheist and put it to proper moral use (while elsewise, it would merely be used for perversites, such as the production or solicitation of pornography, obscenity, or other vile uses), such an act could easily be justified as well, much as is or was the seizing of property from the demonic pagans or heathens who endulged in evils such as blood sacrifices, and putting it to correct and proper use in the name of God's kingdom.
3. Historically, when modern fables and false dichtomies of "church and state" were fabricated, to reject God was not only heresy and apostacy, but a crime of high treason against state as well; I see no reason why this dichtomy should be pronounced - as one who is an apostate to God is also a traitor against any nation which acknowledges God.
Therefore, it would be entirely just to make adopting atheism a crime of high treason in all nations worldwide, worthy of the same death sentence that one who joins or donates money to a terrorist organization such as ISIS would receive - for arguably, the atheist is a more dangerous and insidious enemy of God and state than even terrorists are - for terrorists can only harm the external body, whilst the atheist, like any abominable disease or plague, can harm the soul as well.
Therefore, i would advocate that all Christians and monotheists abolish the fictitious and liberal notion by which an inferior and sub-human atheist is purported to have the same rights as a Godly man or woman, and eradicate this scourge from our nations with all the fervor which an Inquisitor of yore would have burned heretics.
1. In the Biblical Old Testament; killing or murder was prohibited under the civil law of the kingdom of God; it did not apply to warfare nor to state-sponsored executions
2. An atheist can be argued not not only to be a heretic or apostate - but an inferior species altogether, worthy of being called "human" only in name.
As the writings of perverse and evil atheists such as Marquis de Sade prove - the atheist is a feral beast, given over to evils such as rape, murder, sodomy, bestiality, pedophilia and the like.
Without the ordination of humanity by God; the atheist is nothing more than another animal - society frequently kills animals for the greater good of itself, therefore to kill atheists or to deprive them of any other nonsensical "rights" - whether property, equality, or otherwise - is not a crime, nor even necessarily a sin.
In order for the atheist to attain human rights, all he needs to do is convert to Christianity or any other monotheistic faith - if he refuses, then he deserves no recognition of humanity, being worthy only of death. Stealing or other acts of aggression against an atheist is not a sin at all either - for if it is in greater good of God's kingdom to seize the property of the atheist and put it to proper moral use (while elsewise, it would merely be used for perversites, such as the production or solicitation of pornography, obscenity, or other vile uses), such an act could easily be justified as well, much as is or was the seizing of property from the demonic pagans or heathens who endulged in evils such as blood sacrifices, and putting it to correct and proper use in the name of God's kingdom.
3. Historically, when modern fables and false dichtomies of "church and state" were fabricated, to reject God was not only heresy and apostacy, but a crime of high treason against state as well; I see no reason why this dichtomy should be pronounced - as one who is an apostate to God is also a traitor against any nation which acknowledges God.
Therefore, it would be entirely just to make adopting atheism a crime of high treason in all nations worldwide, worthy of the same death sentence that one who joins or donates money to a terrorist organization such as ISIS would receive - for arguably, the atheist is a more dangerous and insidious enemy of God and state than even terrorists are - for terrorists can only harm the external body, whilst the atheist, like any abominable disease or plague, can harm the soul as well.
Therefore, i would advocate that all Christians and monotheists abolish the fictitious and liberal notion by which an inferior and sub-human atheist is purported to have the same rights as a Godly man or woman, and eradicate this scourge from our nations with all the fervor which an Inquisitor of yore would have burned heretics.
