This guy is not a whistleblower

floridafan

Verified User
A whistleblower from the Internal Revenue Service who claims he was blocked in his investigation of President Joe Biden's son is nothing more than a "complainer" with a "political ax to grind," a legal expert said Wednesday.

Speaking to "The CBS Evening News" Tuesday, Gary Shapley – an IRS supervisory agent who helped oversee a five year investigation into allegations of tax fraud against Hunter Biden – claimed he was stopped from issuing subpoenas and blocked from doing further investigations.

He was speaking a week after Trump-appointed U.S. attorney for Delaware, David Weiss announced a plea deal in the Biden case

But a specialist in that area of law, Harry Litman, told MSNBC on Wednesday that he doesn't buy Shapley's claims.

"It's very implausible, for starters," Litman said of the Shapley accusations. "I'm a whistleblower lawyer. This guy is not a whistle-blower. A whistleblower goes within the agency, follows the procedures, and says something wrong has happened. This guy is just a complainer with maybe a political ax to grind or maybe just a professional —"

Host Andrea Mitchell cut him off to explain that the only reason he was called a whistleblower was that the House Oversight Committee called him one.

"All I'm saying is a whistle-blower means someone who reports malfeasance in the agency, goes through all the processes and is rebuffed," said Litman.

"This guy has a political career and he may be a professional one, but he's just one guy. He didn't go through any process. There's no corroboration. It's implausible. That's my brief reaction."
 
Well, then, the Bidens are in the clear, For Sure...;) After all, they're the "best at"....;)
 
A whistleblower from the Internal Revenue Service who claims he was blocked in his investigation of President Joe Biden's son is nothing more than a "complainer" with a "political ax to grind," a legal expert said Wednesday.

Speaking to "The CBS Evening News" Tuesday, Gary Shapley – an IRS supervisory agent who helped oversee a five year investigation into allegations of tax fraud against Hunter Biden – claimed he was stopped from issuing subpoenas and blocked from doing further investigations.

He was speaking a week after Trump-appointed U.S. attorney for Delaware, David Weiss announced a plea deal in the Biden case

But a specialist in that area of law, Harry Litman, told MSNBC on Wednesday that he doesn't buy Shapley's claims.

"It's very implausible, for starters," Litman said of the Shapley accusations. "I'm a whistleblower lawyer. This guy is not a whistle-blower. A whistleblower goes within the agency, follows the procedures, and says something wrong has happened. This guy is just a complainer with maybe a political ax to grind or maybe just a professional —"

Host Andrea Mitchell cut him off to explain that the only reason he was called a whistleblower was that the House Oversight Committee called him one.

"All I'm saying is a whistle-blower means someone who reports malfeasance in the agency, goes through all the processes and is rebuffed," said Litman.

"This guy has a political career and he may be a professional one, but he's just one guy. He didn't go through any process. There's no corroboration. It's implausible. That's my brief reaction."

The whistleblower in the Watergate case didn’t go through his agency so obviously this guy is wrong which is why only MSNBC is airing this.

Lol

There is no protocol for being a whistleblower, look at Wikileaks.

He also didn’t dispute a singe claim the whistleblower has made, he is just running his mouth as is typical of liberals looking to cover up their shit with distraction.
 
The whistleblower in the Watergate case didn’t go through his agency so obviously this guy is wrong which is why only MSNBC is airing this.

Lol

There is no protocol for being a whistleblower, look at Wikileaks.

He also didn’t dispute a singe claim the whistleblower has made, he is just running his mouth as is typical of liberals looking to cover up their shit with distraction.

There was no Whistleblower's Protection Act during Watergate.
 
The whistleblower in the Watergate case didn’t go through his agency so obviously this guy is wrong which is why only MSNBC is airing this.

Lol

There is no protocol for being a whistleblower, look at Wikileaks.

He also didn’t dispute a singe claim the whistleblower has made, he is just running his mouth as is typical of liberals looking to cover up their shit with distraction.

Wikileaks :rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2: And what is Wikileaks?????
 
Well, then, the Bidens are in the clear, For Sure...;) After all, they're the "best at"....;)


As far as I can see, only one Biden is in public office,
and in the thick of his mediocre performance,
we're still blessed to not be saddled with his subhuman predecessor
who's already destroyed our judicial system for decades to come.

We have a Republican House and,
with the slugs Sinema and Manchin labeled as Democrats for no discernable reason,
a totally useless Senate.
Anything that requires legislation is impossible for Biden to do
so I can't understand why people even talk about it.

When and if our national IQ ever gets sufficient to elect competent people,
and no luck with that in the first quarter millennium,
we'll still need to do something about our stupid constitution
before we can fix anything.

The politicians only suck
because they come from a population that largely sucks.
We need partition so that the half-civilized blue states at least have a fighting chance
having our own national government.
 
The whistleblower in the Watergate case didn’t go through his agency so obviously this guy is wrong which is why only MSNBC is airing this.

Lol

There is no protocol for being a whistleblower, look at Wikileaks.

He also didn’t dispute a singe claim the whistleblower has made, he is just running his mouth as is typical of liberals looking to cover up their shit with distraction.
LOL. You're young. You don't remember Watergate.

There was no 'agency' to go through
 
The whistleblower in the Watergate case didn’t go through his agency so obviously this guy is wrong which is why only MSNBC is airing this.

Lol

There is no protocol for being a whistleblower, look at Wikileaks.

He also didn’t dispute a singe claim the whistleblower has made, he is just running his mouth as is typical of liberals looking to cover up their shit with distraction.

You're talking about deep throat. You know what else deep throat didn't do? Go on TV and air his political grievances - this guy fucks news is putting up is no whistleblower - he's a demented partisan hack, nothing more.
 
LOL. You're young. You don't remember Watergate.

There was no 'agency' to go through

Not only that, deep throat was a confidential informant. No one knew who he was until recently. This nutjob fucks news is putting up is just another trumptard propagandist.
 
A whistleblower from the Internal Revenue Service who claims he was blocked in his investigation of President Joe Biden's son is nothing more than a "complainer" with a "political ax to grind," a legal expert said Wednesday.

Speaking to "The CBS Evening News" Tuesday, Gary Shapley – an IRS supervisory agent who helped oversee a five year investigation into allegations of tax fraud against Hunter Biden – claimed he was stopped from issuing subpoenas and blocked from doing further investigations.

He was speaking a week after Trump-appointed U.S. attorney for Delaware, David Weiss announced a plea deal in the Biden case

But a specialist in that area of law, Harry Litman, told MSNBC on Wednesday that he doesn't buy Shapley's claims.

"It's very implausible, for starters," Litman said of the Shapley accusations. "I'm a whistleblower lawyer. This guy is not a whistle-blower. A whistleblower goes within the agency, follows the procedures, and says something wrong has happened. This guy is just a complainer with maybe a political ax to grind or maybe just a professional —"

Host Andrea Mitchell cut him off to explain that the only reason he was called a whistleblower was that the House Oversight Committee called him one.

"All I'm saying is a whistle-blower means someone who reports malfeasance in the agency, goes through all the processes and is rebuffed," said Litman.

"This guy has a political career and he may be a professional one, but he's just one guy. He didn't go through any process. There's no corroboration. It's implausible. That's my brief reaction."

If he said the opposite, why do I think you would agree with him.
 
Back
Top