Trump is biggest threat to national security

floridafan

Verified User
Donald Trump wanted to pull the United States out of NATO during his first term, but was repeatedly talked out of it by senior administration officials. For a possible second term in the White House, the 2024 Republican presidential frontrunner is already discussing how he could actually get it done, if his demands aren’t met by NATO. He and his policy-wonk allies are also gaming out how he could dramatically wind down American involvement to merely a “standby” position in NATO, in Trump’s own words.

When the former president has privately discussed the United States’ role in the transatlantic military alliance this year, Trump has made clear that he doesn’t want the upper ranks of a second administration to be staffed by “NATO lovers,” according to two sources who’ve heard him make such comments. The ex-president has made these kinds of jabs at the longstanding alliance during conversations related to the ongoing Russian war in Ukraine.

Trump, the sources say, has continued to express an openness to pulling the U.S. out of NATO altogether. However, Trump has suggested that this could be averted if the alliance — which Trump once famously called “obsolete” — gives in to his newest demands. This would include his desires for non-American members to further and steeply increase their defense spending, and for a reevaluation of the bedrock principle that an attack on one member is tantamount to an attack on all.

When he was in office, Trump would repeatedly scoff at this collective-defense clause of the North Atlantic Treaty, known as Article 5. One former senior administration official recalls to Rolling Stone a moment in the Oval Office in mid-2018 when the then-president started reading from a written list of smaller NATO countries, some of which he argued most Americans had never even heard of before.

Trump then vented that “starting World War III” over some of these countries’ sovereignty made absolutely no sense, and that he shouldn’t be forced to automatically commit American troops to any such crisis.https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/donald-trump-u-s-leave-nato-1234860016/
 
Donald Trump wanted to pull the United States out of NATO during his first term, but was repeatedly talked out of it by senior administration officials. For a possible second term in the White House, the 2024 Republican presidential frontrunner is already discussing how he could actually get it done, if his demands aren’t met by NATO. He and his policy-wonk allies are also gaming out how he could dramatically wind down American involvement to merely a “standby” position in NATO, in Trump’s own words.

When the former president has privately discussed the United States’ role in the transatlantic military alliance this year, Trump has made clear that he doesn’t want the upper ranks of a second administration to be staffed by “NATO lovers,” according to two sources who’ve heard him make such comments. The ex-president has made these kinds of jabs at the longstanding alliance during conversations related to the ongoing Russian war in Ukraine.

Trump, the sources say, has continued to express an openness to pulling the U.S. out of NATO altogether. However, Trump has suggested that this could be averted if the alliance — which Trump once famously called “obsolete” — gives in to his newest demands. This would include his desires for non-American members to further and steeply increase their defense spending, and for a reevaluation of the bedrock principle that an attack on one member is tantamount to an attack on all.

When he was in office, Trump would repeatedly scoff at this collective-defense clause of the North Atlantic Treaty, known as Article 5. One former senior administration official recalls to Rolling Stone a moment in the Oval Office in mid-2018 when the then-president started reading from a written list of smaller NATO countries, some of which he argued most Americans had never even heard of before.

Trump then vented that “starting World War III” over some of these countries’ sovereignty made absolutely no sense, and that he shouldn’t be forced to automatically commit American troops to any such crisis.https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/donald-trump-u-s-leave-nato-1234860016/


entangling alliances should be avoided.

isolationism is smart sometimes.
 
Donald Trump wanted to pull the United States out of NATO during his first term, but was repeatedly talked out of it by senior administration officials. For a possible second term in the White House, the 2024 Republican presidential frontrunner is already discussing how he could actually get it done, if his demands aren’t met by NATO. He and his policy-wonk allies are also gaming out how he could dramatically wind down American involvement to merely a “standby” position in NATO, in Trump’s own words.

When the former president has privately discussed the United States’ role in the transatlantic military alliance this year, Trump has made clear that he doesn’t want the upper ranks of a second administration to be staffed by “NATO lovers,” according to two sources who’ve heard him make such comments. The ex-president has made these kinds of jabs at the longstanding alliance during conversations related to the ongoing Russian war in Ukraine.

Trump, the sources say, has continued to express an openness to pulling the U.S. out of NATO altogether. However, Trump has suggested that this could be averted if the alliance — which Trump once famously called “obsolete” — gives in to his newest demands. This would include his desires for non-American members to further and steeply increase their defense spending, and for a reevaluation of the bedrock principle that an attack on one member is tantamount to an attack on all.

When he was in office, Trump would repeatedly scoff at this collective-defense clause of the North Atlantic Treaty, known as Article 5. One former senior administration official recalls to Rolling Stone a moment in the Oval Office in mid-2018 when the then-president started reading from a written list of smaller NATO countries, some of which he argued most Americans had never even heard of before.

Trump then vented that “starting World War III” over some of these countries’ sovereignty made absolutely no sense, and that he shouldn’t be forced to automatically commit American troops to any such crisis.https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/donald-trump-u-s-leave-nato-1234860016/

You and all you brain dead leftists are a much greater threat. Its why we are in the state we are in because of "people" like you.
 
Now we know that Trump was telling state secrets to people at Mira Lago and other places to childishly show off. Trump is the worst person to have access to our secrets. He will brag about what he knows and show off with super classified info. I am the coolest kid on the block. He should be in jail.
 
Isolationism was laughed at after WW1. It is ridiculous to think you can be all alone in a complex world and prosper. Your thinking is weird.

and you're a globalist brainwash victim.

how is it smart to send all the jobs away and lose the ability to maintain autonomy and self-reliance?

we're waitng for your answer, mr. smarty pants.
 
Trump didn't let something around 6 million unvetted illegals into the US, well over 3000 suspected terrorists, as well as over half-a-million serious criminals, and mountains of drugs like fentanyl that is killing tens of thousands of US citizens a year.

That is to say, Biden has let an invasion of the US occur and is doing nothing about it.
 
Trump didn't let something around 6 million unvetted illegals into the US, well over 3000 suspected terrorists, as well as over half-a-million serious criminals, and mountains of drugs like fentanyl that is killing tens of thousands of US citizens a year.

That is to say, Biden has let an invasion of the US occur and is doing nothing about it.

Not all Biden's fault:

https://www.newsweek.com/border-crossings-3-times-higher-under-biden-trump-1744641

"There are numerous reasons why border crossings are so high, but they aren't all Biden's fault.

While this helped the administration expand beyond the existing avenues allowed under Title 8—where immigrants are detained and assessed before they are admitted into the country—the Trump administration inadvertently created a veritable catch-and-release system that allowed migrants to make multiple attempts to enter the U.S. from the southern border.

As of May 2022, approximately half of all single adults from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador expelled to Mexico under Title 42 were apprehended crossing the border a second time, according to research by the American Immigration Council—with one-third of all detainees counting at least two previous attempts at crossing the border.
 
Trump created the problem with his "catch and release" program. Biden's now dealing with it and taking the blame.
 
https://connolly.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4691

"TRUTH: President Biden inherited an immigration system in tatters. The Trump administration cut off legal pathways to citizenship, leaving would-be migrants with fewer lawful methods of entering the country. They cut funding to Central American countries in 2019 as they splurged on an ineffective, costly wall.

It was the Trump administration that tightened sanctions on Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, exacerbating the macroeconomic crises that have led hundreds of thousands to flee and arrive at the southern border. When they pulled the rug out from various, essential assistance programs, they made the problem worse.
But our immigration system has been broken for many decades — long before Joe Biden or Donald Trump took the oath of office. Time and again, Democrats have proposed solutions to fix the immigration system in a reasonable, humane way. And time and again, Republicans have opposed these efforts at every turn."
 
You and all you brain dead leftists are a much greater threat. Its why we are in the state we are in because of "people" like you.

Trump is a jerkoff...and so are his continuing supporters.

He is a greater danger to our Republic than all our foreign enemies put together. It is too bad for our nation (and the rest of the world) that people like you are not intelligent enough to recongnize that.
 
Trump is a jerkoff...and so are his continuing supporters.

He is a greater danger to our Republic than all our foreign enemies put together. It is too bad for our nation (and the rest of the world) that people like you are not intelligent enough to recongnize that.

how did you become insane?

why do you lie so much?
 
Donald Trump wanted to pull the United States out of NATO during his first term, but was repeatedly talked out of it by senior administration officials.
Interestingly, this looks identical to Donald Trump never intending to pull the US out of NATO.

For a possible second term in the White House, the 2024 Republican presidential frontrunner is already discussing how he could actually get it done, if his demands aren’t met by NATO.
You just finished explaining how his senior administration officials have full control over this situation.

He and his policy-wonk allies are also gaming out how he could dramatically wind down American involvement to merely a “standby” position in NATO, in Trump’s own words.
How can Trump be both planning to exit NATO and planning to remain in NATO at the same time?

The ex-president has made these kinds of jabs at the longstanding alliance during conversations related to the ongoing Russian war in Ukraine.
So has everybody on JPP.

Trump, the sources say, ...
What are the names of these "sources" so I can verify the veracity of the report?

... has continued to express an openness to pulling the U.S. out of NATO altogether. However, Trump has suggested that this could be averted if the alliance — which Trump once famously called “obsolete” — gives in to his newest demands.
Wouldn't it have been much quicker, easier and clearer if you had just written that Trump is negotiating?

This would include his desires for non-American members to further and steeply increase their defense spending,
Are you saying that Trump is demanding that all NATO countries meet their NATO obligations? No way!

and for a reevaluation of the bedrock principle that an attack on one member is tantamount to an attack on all.
The NATO pact does not include the words "tantamount to."

One former senior administration official recalls to Rolling Stone a moment in the Oval Office in mid-2018 when the then-president started reading from a written list of smaller NATO countries, some of which he argued most Americans had never even heard of before.
You had me at one unnamed "former senior administration official" and "Rolling Stone" magazine; Just tell me what I am to believe.

Trump then vented that “starting World War III” over some of these countries’ sovereignty made absolutely no sense, and that he shouldn’t be forced to automatically commit American troops to any such crisis.
So Trump is actually intelligent and wise? Now I'm confused.
 
Back
Top