US warns French companies they must comply with Trump's diversity ban

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
The Trump administration has ordered some French companies with U.S. government contracts to comply with his executive order banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, highlighting the extraterritorial reach of U.S. policies and their potential impact on European corporate practices.

The companies have been told to confirm their compliance in a questionnaire entitled "Certification Regarding Compliance With Applicable Federal Anti-Discrimination Law." Reuters has seen a copy of the questionnaire.


 
There was no indication that the companies receiving the letter were selected based on their presence in the United States. A source close to the matter confirmed that France's state-controlled telecoms group Orange, which has no U.S. presence, received the letter.

Meanwhile, defence electronics firm Thales and oil major Total Energies, both with operations in the U.S., did not receive it, according to spokespeople for the companies. Orange declined to comment.
 
Anyone who believes in DEI as it is practiced, is exactly what you claim Trump is.
So how is it practiced Terry?

(DEI) are organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination based on identity or disability.

anti-DEI backlash is really about resegregation and white supremacy. The beginning of diversity initiatives is often linked to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed into law, following slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws, by US president Lyndon B. Johnson.
 
So how is it practiced Terry?

(DEI) are organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination based on identity or disability.

anti-DEI backlash is really about resegregation and white supremacy. The beginning of diversity initiatives is often linked to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed into law, following slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws, by US president Lyndon B. Johnson.
The reality of it is that it:

Encourages racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry
Hires and promotes not on the basis of merit, ability, or excellence but on the basis of racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry
It practices hate and bigotry
It is not inclusive or equitable.
Diversity on divides and is based on a set of narrowly defined rules giving certain groups an advantage.

On the whole it's totally the sort of racism the Old South practiced in the antebellum period up to about 1960.
 
So how is it practiced Terry?

(DEI) are organizational frameworks that seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination based on identity or disability.

You said it yourself right there without realizing it. You admitted it's everything I claimed.

"historically underrepresented or subject to discrimination..." equals hiring quotas. Those are pure discrimination. There's no way around it either. You have to have, MUST HAVE, quotas to determine if some group you decided is "underrepresented" is no long so.
To do that, you have to, MUST, treat other groups unfairly. Your picking persons to participate is being done on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, etc., rather than on merit or ability.
anti-DEI backlash is really about resegregation and white supremacy. The beginning of diversity initiatives is often linked to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, signed into law, following slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws, by US president Lyndon B. Johnson.

The backlash is everyone ends up being treated unfairly and unequally. It drives division and divisiveness.
 
The reality of it is that it:

Encourages racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry
Hires and promotes not on the basis of merit, ability, or excellence but on the basis of racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry
It practices hate and bigotry
It is not inclusive or equitable.

You have described MAGA
Diversity on divides and is based on a set of narrowly defined rules giving certain groups an advantage.

On the whole it's totally the sort of racism the Old South practiced in the antebellum period up to about 1960.
So terry you fought for civil rights?
 
The Trump administration has ordered some French companies with U.S. government contracts to comply with his executive order banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, highlighting the extraterritorial reach of U.S. policies and their potential impact on European corporate practices.

The companies have been told to confirm their compliance in a questionnaire entitled "Certification Regarding Compliance With Applicable Federal Anti-Discrimination Law." Reuters has seen a copy of the questionnaire.


And trumptards call Democrats "the word police"! It takes intelligence to be able to experience irony and trumptards are morons.
 
There was no indication that the companies receiving the letter were selected based on their presence in the United States. A source close to the matter confirmed that France's state-controlled telecoms group Orange, which has no U.S. presence, received the letter.

Meanwhile, defence electronics firm Thales and oil major Total Energies, both with operations in the U.S., did not receive it, according to spokespeople for the companies. Orange declined to comment.
It's just more smoke and mirrors from the Orange Oaf and company. But as they see their jobs and SocSec and healthcare dwindle away, his "base" is growing smaller and smaller.
 
Back
Top