We are going to make history

Congress is in the final stages of a fateful debate about the future of health insurance in America.

It’s a debate that’s raged not just for the past year but for the past century.

One thing when you’re in the White House, you’ve got a lot of history books around you. and so I’ve been reading up on the history here.

Teddy Roosevelt, Republican, was the first to advocate that everybody get health care in this country.

Every decade since, we’ve had Presidents, Republicans and Democrats, from Harry Truman to Richard Nixon to JFK to Lyndon Johnson, every single President has said we need to fix this system.

It’s a debate that’s not only about the cost of health care, not just about what we’re doing about folks who aren’t getting a fair shake from their insurance companies.

It’s a debate about the character of our country, about whether we can still meet the challenges of our time; whether we still have the guts and the courage to give every citizen, not just some, the chance to reach their dreams.

At the heart of this debate is the question of whether we’re going to accept a system that works better for the insurance companies than it does for the American people, because if this vote fails, the insurance industry will continue to run amok.

They will continue to deny people coverage.

They will continue to deny people care.

They will continue to jack up premiums 40 or 50 or 60 percent as they have in the last few weeks without any accountability whatsoever.

They know this, and that’s why their lobbyists are stalking the halls of Congress as we speak, and pouring millions of dollars into negative ads, and that’s why they are doing everything they can to kill this bill.

So the only question left is this: Are we going to let the special interests win once again?

Or are we going to make this vote a victory for the American people?

The time for reform is right now.

Not a year from now, not five years from now, not 10 years from now, not 20 years from now, it’s now.

We have had a year of hard debate.

Every proposal has been put on the table.

Every argument has been made.

We have incorporated the best ideas from Democrats and from Republicans into a final proposal that builds on the system of private insurance that we currently have.

The insurance industry and its supporters in Congress have tried to portray this as radical change.

Now, I just want to be clear, everybody.

Listen up, because we have heard every crazy thing about this bill.

You remember.

First, we heard this was a government takeover of health care.

Then we heard that this was going to kill granny.

Then we heard illegal immigrants are going to be getting the main benefits of this bill.

They have thrown every argument at this legislative effort.

Then it turns out, at the end of the day, what we’re talking about is common-sense reform.

That’s all we’re talking about.

If you like your doctor, you’re going to be able to keep your doctor.

If you like your plan, keep your plan.

I don’t believe we should give government or the insurance companies more control over health care in America.

I think it’s time to give you, the American people, more control over your health, and since you’ve been hearing a whole bunch of nonsense, let’s just be clear on what exactly the proposal that they’re going to vote on in a couple of days will do.

It’s going to change health care in three ways.

Number one, we are going to end the worst practices of insurance companies.

This is a patient’s bill of rights on steroids.

Starting this year, thousands of uninsured Americans with preexisting conditions will be able to purchase health insurance, some for the very first time.

Starting this year, insurance companies will be banned forever from denying coverage to children with preexisting conditions.

Starting this year, insurance companies will be banned from dropping your coverage when you get sick, and they’ve been spending a lot of time weeding out people who are sick so they don’t have to pay benefits that people have already paid for.

Those practices will end.

If this reform becomes law, all new insurance plans will be required to offer free preventive care to their customers.

If you buy a new plan, there won’t be lifetime or restrictive annual limits on the amount of care you receive from your insurance companies, and by the way, to all the young people, starting this year, if you don’t have insurance, all new plans will allow you to stay on your parents’ plan until you are 26 years old.

So that’s the first thing this legislation does, the toughest insurance reforms in history.

And by the way, when you talk to Republicans and you say, well, are you against this? A lot of them will say, no, no, that part’s okay.

All right, so let’s go to the second part.

The second thing that would change about the current system is that for the first time, small business owners and people who are being priced out of the insurance market will have the same kind of choice of private health insurance that members of Congress give to themselves.

So, what this means is, is that small business owners and middle-class families, they’re going to be able to be part of what’s called a big pool of customers that can negotiate with the insurance companies, and that means they can purchase more affordable coverage in a competitive marketplace.

So, they’re not out there on their own just shopping. They’re part of millions of people who are shopping together, and if you still can’t afford the insurance in this new marketplace, even though it’s going to be cheaper than what you can get on your own, then we’re going to offer you tax credits to help you afford it, tax credits that add up to the largest middle-class tax cut for health care in American history.

Now, these tax credits cost money.

Helping folks who can’t afford it right now, that does cost some money. It costs about $100 billion per year. So, we’re going to eliminate wasteful taxpayer subsidies to insurance companies. We’re going to set a new fee on insurance companies that stand to gain millions of new customers.

So, here’s the point: This proposal is paid for.

Unlike some of these previous schemes in Washington, we’re not taking out the credit card in your name, young people, and charging it to you. We’re making sure this thing is paid for. All right, so that's the second thing.

Now, the third thing that this legislation does is it brings down the cost of health care for families and businesses and the federal government.

Americans who are buying comparable coverage in the individual market would end up seeing their premiums go down 14 to 20 percent.

Americans who get their insurance through the workplace, cost savings could be as much as $3,000 less per employer than if we do nothing.

Now, think about that. That’s $3,000 your employer doesn’t have to pay, which means maybe she can afford to give you a raise.

And, by the way, if you’re curious, well, how exactly are we saving these costs?

Well, part of it is, again, we’re not spending our health care money wisely.

So, for example, you go to the hospital or you go to a doctor and you may take five tests, when it turns out if you just took one test, then you send an e-mail around with the test results, you wouldn’t be paying $500 per test.

So, we’re trying to save money across the system, and altogether, our cost-cutting measures would reduce most people’s premiums. And here’s the bonus: It brings down our deficit by more than $1 trillion over the next two decades.

So you’ve got a whole bunch of opponents of this bill saying, well, we can’t afford this; we’re fiscal conservatives.

These are the same guys who passed that prescription drug bill without paying for it, adding over $1 trillion to our deficit. But, this bill, according to the Congressional Budget Office, which is the referee, the scorekeeper for how much things cost, says we’ll save us $1 trillion.

Not only can we afford to do this, we can’t afford not to do this.

So, here’s the bottom line. That’s our proposal: toughest insurance reforms in history, one of the biggest deficit-reduction plans in history, and the opportunity to give millions of people, some of them in your own family, an opportunity for the first time in a very long time to get affordable health care.

That’s it. That’s what we’re trying to do. That’s what the Congress of the United States is about to vote on this weekend.

We are going to get this done. We are going to make history.

We are going to fix health care in America, with your help.

God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.
 
:lol:

Enjoy your one & only term asshole, the citizens of the USA will not forget when elections come around. Democrats will be tossed out like yesterday's garbage.

View attachment 385

You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch ...


watch
 
Indoor tanning salons will charge customers a 10 percent tax beginning today in just one of the changes Americans will see as a result of the U.S. health-care overhaul signed into law by President Barack Obama. ?

You know...it would be funny if it wasn't so fuckin' sad.
 
There isn't anything that won't be taxed now.

Indoor tanning salons will charge customers a 10 percent tax beginning today in just one of the changes Americans will see as a result of the U.S. health-care overhaul signed into law by President Barack Obama. ?

You know...it would be funny if it wasn't so fuckin' sad.
 
They shouldn't be taxed, they should be prosecuted for promoting a practice that can lead to skin cancers including malignant melanoma. Why is it any different from taxing cigarettes?

If you take that one step further couldn't we say the same about junk food and soda for example? I don't think they offer any nutrients that we need but can't get in any other food. If the government is in the health care business that is definitely one way to keep people healthier.
 
They shouldn't be taxed, they should be prosecuted for promoting a practice that can lead to skin cancers including malignant melanoma. Why is it any different from taxing cigarettes?

Which is also bad.


When government profits off vice, do you think they will really seek it's eradication? duh. You're dumber than a stump.
 
Which is also bad.


When government profits off vice, do you think they will really seek it's eradication? duh. You're dumber than a stump.

Why don't you go back to looking for the Noahides secretly planning to take over the world, and let the rest of us discuss the current events.

Duh. :palm:
 
If you take that one step further couldn't we say the same about junk food and soda for example? I don't think they offer any nutrients that we need but can't get in any other food. If the government is in the health care business that is definitely one way to keep people healthier.

We know cigarettes kill. There's direct evidence of it. Junk food and soda will contribute to obesity and tooth decay when not used in moderation, but they're not toxic in and of themselves.

But to be completely honest I don't particularly like the look of a tan, and have no use for tanning parlors, self-tanners, etc. So I'm bringing my personal bias to this.
 
Why don't you go back to looking for the Noahides secretly planning to take over the world, and let the rest of us discuss the current events.

Duh. :palm:

You just can't face the stupidity of your own beliefs.

You need to consider the fact that when government profits off bad behavior, it is monetarily incentived to facilitate it, despite rhetoric.

And what are Noahides?
 
We sure are going to make history. Like Washington State and Hawaii, we'll be the first nation to repeal wickedly expensive non-cost reducing health care debacles...

;)
 
Back
Top