When lefties attack

Mr. T

Mr. T

Verified User
Almost anyone who is familiar with political boards know to well how liberals attack others who dont agree with them or their twisted view on the national and world stage of politics.


In Lieu of Well-Reasoned Arguments, the Left Relies on Intimidation

Because the radical demands of groups like the American Civil Liberties Union run counter to common sense and the tenets of Western Civilization, they and their leftist allies and colleagues use fear, intimidation, and disinformation to accomplish their ends which generally mean a loss of liberty for everyone else. We see this in the way they rely on shame tactics, the court system, and behavior controls, like speech codes and “anti-bullying” regulations, to implement and protect their agenda.
Just think of how many times you’ve heard someone mention they wanted to say something about the blatant lawlessness and immorality in our culture, but they hesitated because they didn’t want to rock the boat—they didn’t want to disturb the status quo. All too often, this is because the totalitarians on the left have successfully levered sufficient shame to intimidate decent people into silence.

In other words, groups like NARAL and their media allies use shame to bring a strong man low enough to allow a weaker man to control him: shame takes the fight out of the dog.

For example, the left’s use of the court system is ubiquitous, and perhaps best exemplified through Roe v. Wade (1973), the case which made most state laws against abortion unenforceable.

Even now, the leftist American Atheists is suing to have a cross – a cross not made by human effort –removed from the National 9/11 Memorial in New York, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State are suing to shut down a proposed school voucher system in D.C.: a system aimed at delivering some of the students from the cycle of poverty and ignorance by allowing them to attend private schools where both the curriculum and environment are better. Because the vouchers could be used to attend private, Christian schools, Americans United for Separation for Church and State complains, “Vouchers…compel taxpayers to subsidize religion.” (As if they don’t know that the other option is to have government compel taxpayers to subsidize the anti-Christian/Jewish curriculum now rampant in government schools.)

The great irony here is that many of the aforementioned groups are among those who claim to do everything in the name of the people, yet it is they who frequently use the court system to bypass the people – and even sue to prevent elections – because they know their ideas lack popular support when put to the test.

And for those who dare brush aside the shame tactics or fight fire with fire in the courtroom, the left has enacted speech and anti-bullying codes that serve as more stringent forms of behavior control. Promoted by those like GLSEN and the ACLU, the speech codes are prevalent on high school and university campuses where even certain student-sponsored statements and phrases are disallowed unless uttered in a designated “free speech” area. And on the same campuses, diversity campaigns, and the “anti-bullying” campaigns that usually accompany them, result in the implementation of policies that actually create a caste system for those whose sensitivities are not protected from insult and discrimination, and that usually means a Christian ministry that wants to spread the Good News of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

One last point: these methods of intimidation are bolstered by the left’s use of cripplingly costly lawsuits, which go above and beyond their “normal” use of the court system to rid our landscape of crosses, references to Scripture, “In God We Trust” inscriptions, etc.

Frivolous lawsuit after lawsuit is filed against things like Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s call to voluntary prayer or any public mention of one’s faith by a political figure with the hope not simply of ending a day of prayer but of scaring small municipalities into scrubbing their speech free of any religious reference—or else. (For example, groups like the Freedom From Religion Foundation maintain an Internet link which exists solely for the purpose of reporting any “violators.”)

Reality is thus twisted and turned upon its head in a world where the left ignores the metaphysical while waging war on logic and tradition. In the end, they have to intimidate people into playing along or being silent because they lack arguments sufficient to convince us that their way is better.
Source
Click to expand...
 
Remember all the frivolous lawsuits filed against Governor Palin. She beat every one of them, but it took a lot of her own personal fortune and time to do it. In fact the fight forced her to resign from office. The liberal's response was to call her a "quitter".
 
Mr. T said:
Almost anyone who is familiar with political boards know to well how liberals attack others who dont agree with them or their twisted view on the national and world stage of politics.
Click to expand...

(Excerpt from posted article) Reality is thus twisted and turned upon its head in a world where the left ignores the metaphysical while waging war on logic and tradition. (End)

The history of mankind is replete with examples of laws and traditions based on religious nonsense and/or ones interpretation of the metaphysical. No one has the right to demand others live according to any specific way unless that way can be proven to be beneficial to mankind.

One is free to live according to how they feel and believe but it is illogical and outright wrong to force others to do so.

(Excerpt) Because the radical demands of groups like the American Civil Liberties Union run counter to common sense and the tenets of Western Civilization, they and their leftist allies and colleagues use fear, intimidation, and disinformation to accomplish their ends which generally mean a loss of liberty for everyone else. We see this in the way they rely on shame tactics, the court system, and behavior controls, like speech codes and “anti-bullying” regulations, to implement and protect their agenda. (End)

Nothing like lumping everything together even though it makes little sense. The Left do employ the court system because the onus is on the lawmaker to prove a law is necessary or beneficial to mankind. The Left attempt to root out disinformation and squash laws based on nothing but a person's "belief". That has been one of the tenets of Western Civilization. If it had not been for people searching for and demanding the truth we'd still be worried about falling off the end of the world or equating thunder with an angry God.

It's all about proof. It has nothing to do with "I believe" or "it's always been that way" or what some dude wrote thousands of years ago. Everything must be questioned and examined. Every single thing. That is what the Left do.
 
Alan Sears of the far right wing Christian Alliance Defense Fund?

We'll let the father of the Conservative movement handle this one...

"Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the Republican party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them."
Barry Goldwater
 
Mr. T said:
Almost anyone who is familiar with political boards know to well how liberals attack others who dont agree with them or their twisted view on the national and world stage of politics.
Click to expand...

You know you can tell the rantings of failed ideology when they have to stoop to marginalizing their opponents who point out their failings.
 
apple0154 said:
(Excerpt from posted article) Reality is thus twisted and turned upon its head in a world where the left ignores the metaphysical while waging war on logic and tradition. (End)

The history of mankind is replete with examples of laws and traditions based on religious nonsense and/or ones interpretation of the metaphysical. No one has the right to demand others live according to any specific way unless that way can be proven to be beneficial to mankind.

One is free to live according to how they feel and believe but it is illogical and outright wrong to force others to do so.

(Excerpt) Because the radical demands of groups like the American Civil Liberties Union run counter to common sense and the tenets of Western Civilization, they and their leftist allies and colleagues use fear, intimidation, and disinformation to accomplish their ends which generally mean a loss of liberty for everyone else. We see this in the way they rely on shame tactics, the court system, and behavior controls, like speech codes and “anti-bullying” regulations, to implement and protect their agenda. (End)

Nothing like lumping everything together even though it makes little sense. The Left do employ the court system because the onus is on the lawmaker to prove a law is necessary or beneficial to mankind. The Left attempt to root out disinformation and squash laws based on nothing but a person's "belief". That has been one of the tenets of Western Civilization. If it had not been for people searching for and demanding the truth we'd still be worried about falling off the end of the world or equating thunder with an angry God.

It's all about proof. It has nothing to do with "I believe" or "it's always been that way" or what some dude wrote thousands of years ago. Everything must be questioned and examined. Every single thing. That is what the Left do.
Click to expand...

Probably the single most idiotic and inane notion of the modern conservative movement is the notion of faith based public policy.
 
The extreme right wackos always want to legislate morality, it comes up every election cycle. It never works, this country is too diverse.

Sorry Elect Perry, your crusade will have to wait.

What I find funny is that corporate interests who don't give a damn about religion always use the crusader type Christians but never come thru on their promises. And idiots like Elect Perry always fall for it.
 
Crashk said:
The extreme right wackos always want to legislate morality, it comes up every election cycle. It never works, this country is too diverse.

Sorry Elect Perry, your crusade will have to wait.

What I find funny is that corporate interests who don't give a damn about religion always use the crusader type Christians but never come thru on their promises. And idiots like Elect Perry always fall for it.
Click to expand...
Well hey, if it works...can you blame them?
 
Crashk said:
The extreme right wackos always want to legislate morality, it comes up every election cycle. It never works, this country is too diverse.

Sorry Elect Perry, your crusade will have to wait.

What I find funny is that corporate interests who don't give a damn about religion always use the crusader type Christians but never come thru on their promises. And idiots like Elect Perry always fall for it.
Click to expand...

Someone has to keep you monkeys from making a muck out of things, so the zoo will be a safe place to visit.
 
Mr. T said:
Almost anyone who is familiar with political boards know to well how liberals attack others who dont agree with them or their twisted view on the national and world stage of politics.
Click to expand...

In Lieu of Well-Reasoned Arguments, the Left Relies on Intimidation

Because the radical demands of groups like the American Civil Liberties Union run counter to common sense and the tenets of Western Civilization, they and their leftist allies and colleagues use fear, intimidation, and disinformation to accomplish their ends which generally mean a loss of liberty for everyone else. We see this in the way they rely on shame tactics, the court system, and behavior controls, like speech codes and “anti-bullying” regulations, to implement and protect their agenda.
Just think of how many times you’ve heard someone mention they wanted to say something about the blatant lawlessness and immorality in our culture, but they hesitated because they didn’t want to rock the boat—they didn’t want to disturb the status quo. All too often, this is because the totalitarians on the left have successfully levered sufficient shame to intimidate decent people into silence.
Decent people? Silence? Where do you get that from? The right has no problem invading the bedrooms of citizens, invading the bodies of women, or denying citizens the right to vote, to assimilate into the fabric of America. Like they own the world. Silence. I wish they would be silent. The world would be a more pleasant place.

In other words, groups like NARAL and their media allies use shame to bring a strong man low enough to allow a weaker man to control him: shame takes the fight out of the dog.

Shame??? The right doesn't know the meaning of the word. Normal people are ashamed of their actions...they care not for the opinions of others or morality.
For example, the left’s use of the court system is ubiquitous, and perhaps best exemplified through Roe v. Wade (1973), the case which made most state laws against abortion unenforceable.

Even now, the leftist American Atheists is suing to have a cross – a cross not made by human effort –removed from the National 9/11 Memorial in New York, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State are suing to shut down a proposed school voucher system in D.C.: a system aimed at delivering some of the students from the cycle of poverty and ignorance by allowing them to attend private schools where both the curriculum and environment are better. Because the vouchers could be used to attend private, Christian schools, Americans United for Separation for Church and State complains, “Vouchers…compel taxpayers to subsidize religion.” (As if they don’t know that the other option is to have government compel taxpayers to subsidize the anti-Christian/Jewish curriculum now rampant in government schools.)
The right loves to blur the lines between the separation of church and state.
The great irony here is that many of the aforementioned groups are among those who claim to do everything in the name of the people, yet it is they who frequently use the court system to bypass the people – and even sue to prevent elections – because they know their ideas lack popular support when put to the test.


Oh, please. The right uses the self same tactics, when it works toward their advantage.

And for those who dare brush aside the shame tactics or fight fire with fire in the courtroom, the left has enacted speech and anti-bullying codes that serve as more stringent forms of behavior control. Promoted by those like GLSEN and the ACLU, the speech codes are prevalent on high school and university campuses where even certain student-sponsored statements and phrases are disallowed unless uttered in a designated “free speech” area. And on the same campuses, diversity campaigns, and the “anti-bullying” campaigns that usually accompany them, result in the implementation of policies that actually create a caste system for those whose sensitivities are not protected from insult and discrimination, and that usually means a Christian ministry that wants to spread the Good News of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.


Well, when folks fail to control themselves, tongues included, then measures have to be instituted to make them mind. Freedom also means freedom "from".

One last point: these methods of intimidation are bolstered by the left’s use of cripplingly costly lawsuits, which go above and beyond their “normal” use of the court system to rid our landscape of crosses, references to Scripture, “In God We Trust” inscriptions, etc.

Frivolous lawsuit after lawsuit is filed against things like Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s call to voluntary prayer or any public mention of one’s faith by a political figure with the hope not simply of ending a day of prayer but of scaring small municipalities into scrubbing their speech free of any religious reference—or else. (For example, groups like the Freedom From Religion Foundation maintain an Internet link which exists solely for the purpose of reporting any “violators.”)

Again blurring the lines of separation of church and state. Rick Perry, in his capacity as Governor of the state of Texas, can't call for a public religious demonstration, by definition. Reality is thus twisted and turned upon its head in a world where the left ignores the metaphysical while waging war on logic and tradition. In the end, they have to intimidate people into playing along or being silent because they lack arguments sufficient to convince us that their way is better.

Not better, equal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top