Have you ever held someone down and cut off their hair?

Superfreak said:
Lol... yeah, you are right, he wasn't one of the five... but the fact remains that the post called him to tell him about the story.... and they lied about it. So they could sensationalize a story, just like you and your ilk are doing for your master. Good little parrot.
Click to expand...


I don't think it's all that funny that you are so fucking shameless. It's embarrassing to read at this point. I'm embarrassed for you.
 
General Buck Turgidson said:
I don't think it's all that funny that you are so fucking shameless. It's embarrassing to read at this point. I'm embarrassed for you.
Click to expand...

LMAO... I am not the one using a 50 year old incident & sensationalizing the hell out of it, despite the family saying it is wrong. But do go on with how embarrassed you are for me. You douche bag. Keep using a dead guy for political gain.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... I am not the one using a 50 year old incident & sensationalizing the hell out of it, despite the family saying it is wrong. But do go on with how embarrassed you are for me. You douche bag. Keep using a dead guy for political gain.
Click to expand...


No, you're the guy calling every witness to the incident a liar, saying the Washington Post is a bunch of liars, saying that the incident was just a prank and a hair cut and that hair grows back and it's just boys being boys while lying about what the family said about the incident and lying about the witnesses to the incident quoted in the story.

Like I said, it's embarrassing.
 
Superfreak said:
yeah, the part you are missing is that the one incident the former Obama campaign worker chose was that which involved a dead guy... a guy who couldn't tell us if the former Obama man was lying or not. Which takes us back to the completely unreliable hit pieces lies.

The fact that you continue trying to dramatize the event by calling the scissors a 'deadly weapon' shows exactly why you continue with this story. You want to use an event from 50 years ago to demonize a Republican. That is all you care about. You could care less what actually happened. All you care about is dramatizing it to try and persuade voters that Romney be evilzzz. Tell us, if Romney was so bad, why not tell us of an incident that involved someone who was still alive if you are the Obama man coming forward with this 'story'? Why not come forward when Romney was running for Governor... when the 'victim' was still alive to tell his tale?

Yeah, you don't care about any of that. You just want to paint the picture as a 'vicious assault' on a 'screaming kid' with a 'deadly weapon'.
Click to expand...

I read somewhere that there was a guy who not only was there, when Obama ate dog; but said that Obama actually cut the dog's throat, then butchered it, and drank the blood.
He can't say anything now; because he died under suspicious circumstances.
 
Damocles said:
Because it happened. Do you remember things that you've never done?
Click to expand...

I remember if I have or have not done things of any signifigance. If I cut someone's hair while others were holding them down, Id remember. If I was accused of doing it, Id deny it.
 
Superfreak said:
As I stated to Darla, you are projecting the emotions you want him to have onto him. You have no idea. You just want to project the worst in some pathetic attempt to use an event from 50 years ago to promote your master.



You are trying to exploit the victim. Or did you fail to see the comments from his sisters? The one that stated they thought the victim would be pissed that you and those like you were using this for political reasons. Did you miss that? Because they were quite clear on it. But let me guess, you think the Obama campaign worker knew the guy better than his sisters did... right? It is not a straw man... it is a fact. You are using this incident for political purposes. You are projecting the emotions YOU want him to have onto him, when he isn't here to speak. His family stated they were unhappy with those who would wish to use him for political reasons, yet you and your ilk continue to do so... and you have the nerve to call me craven.



I don't doubt that many today would feel that way. Saying something could potentially be traumatizing is easy to do. What you are saying is that it WAS traumatizing. Anything 'could' be traumatizing. We all react to different circumstances in different ways. Obviously you would have crawled up into a fetal position and then killed yourself if someone had cut your hair. We get that. You have displayed for us exactly how you would have responded. Your problem again is that you are trying to project your response and reaction to the kid that got his hair cut. That is where you fail. That is where your desperation has led you. Down a pathetic path of taking a dead guys experience from 50 years ago and trying to use him for your political masters gain.
Click to expand...

And then consider how these psociopath'S are traumatizing the poor man's sisters.

HAVE THEY NO COMPASSION and why aren't they considering the victims that they are creating.
 
Jarod said:
I remember if I have or have not done things of any signifigance. If I cut someone's hair while others were holding them down, Id remember. If I was accused of doing it, Id deny it.
Click to expand...

right....so because you would supposedly remember it....then everyone else should

:rolleyes:
 
Rana said:
I don't remember them using the phrase as much as Nion and Reagan, but I am sure they have, especially Clinton.
Click to expand...

don't know about nixon, but wouldn't surprise me. reagan....i thought it was olie north...could have been reagan as well...i was in grade school then.
 
Who stole the cookie from the cookie jar?
Romney stole the cookie from the cookie jar.
Who, me?
Yes, you!
Not me!/Couldn't be!/Wasn't me!/Don't remember stealing cookies from the cookie jar!
Then who?/Who stole the cookies from the cookie jar?
 
Jarod said:
I remember if I have or have not done things of any signifigance. If I cut someone's hair while others were holding them down, Id remember. If I was accused of doing it, Id deny it.
Click to expand...

I'm always reticent to be 100% sure about anything. If I remember doing it, then I would admit it. If I don't remember doing it, I really would (I'm not just saying this because of this) say that I don't remember ever doing such a thing.

Unfortunately in my wild youth I may have done something I may be ashamed of during a drunken blackout period. Man, I am glad I got past those times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top