The real "war on women"

Yurt said:
"there is no war on women" equals "there is no distinction in the war on women"

^ LOL ^
Click to expand...

LOL

Yurt, I'm sorry man - but you are so stupid.

Who used "no distinction in the war on women?" I said you couldn't make the distinction between comedians calling names, and politicians setting policy. And you can't.

You're really such an epic buffoon. I suppose I'll hear something next like "you logic is that policy is funny, so comedians can't be funny, so they all have to run for Senator."
 
Bijou said:
By being subjected to the mind-numbing stupidity that emits from the piehole.
Click to expand...

I could say the same thing about the other ladies on the show with whom I disagree politically most of the time....but I let my wife point out the grossness of the likes of Bayer (spelling intentionally wrong cause she makes me want an aspirin) which reminds me why I married her...ugh...mi wife, that is. :)
 
Bijou said:
No, we're in agreement on that point; most women do feel that way. Whether that is true in every instance of its use is debatable, though.

Maher didn't use the word to describe Palin with any illusions that it might intimidate and quiet her, obviously.
Click to expand...

I use to detest it more, than I saw "the Vagina Monologues" and was liberated!
 
Yurt said:
where did i say there was no distinction? this should be good. somehow "there is no war on women" means i think the OP and your alleged war are the same thing. LOL you truly are not smart onceler, despite constantly claiming you are.
Click to expand...


Onceler hasn't claimed he's smart...merely smarter THAN YOU...there's a big difference!
 
Onceler said:
I think you're way confused. It isn't a "they do it too!" The OP claims to talk about the "real" war on women, and then proceeded to talk about comedians calling people names.

The "real" war on women has to do with policy. Like I said, it's unsurprising that you can't grasp such a massive distinction.
Click to expand...

Onceler said:
LOL

Yurt, I'm sorry man - but you are so stupid.

Who used "no distinction in the war on women?" I said you couldn't make the distinction between comedians calling names, and politicians setting policy. And you can't.

You're really such an epic buffoon. I suppose I'll hear something next like "you logic is that policy is funny, so comedians can't be funny, so they all have to run for Senator."
Click to expand...

how embarrassing. you don't even understand what you posted just a few hours ago. you said i couldn't understand the distinction between the alleged wars on women...that is what the OP is about and what you were talking about for dozens of posts. i referred to it that way many times and you responded many times. now, because you're embarrassed by your idiocy, you're now moving the goal posts with the hope no one remembers what you wrote a few hours ago.

your take on my logic is truly retarded. i never said any such thing. your dumb premise is that because maher is a comedian, his whole show much be comedy. you are beyond dumb onceler. you are without hope.

once agaion....how is "no war on women"equal no distinction? poor onceler.
 
Can we all agree that there is no clear distinction between "comedy" and "political commentary" or, for that matter, [insert any artistic or creative endeavor] and political commentary? I think it'd be a grave injustice to say that Arlo Guthrie is just a folk singer because he sings folk songs.
 
General Buck Turgidson said:
Can we all agree that there is no clear distinction between "comedy" and "political commentary" or, for that matter, [insert any artistic or creative endeavor] and political commentary? I think it'd be a grave injustice to say that Arlo Guthrie is just a folk singer because he sings folk songs.
Click to expand...

you mean like rembrandt's painting 'the night watch'
 
Yurt said:
how embarrassing. you don't even understand what you posted just a few hours ago. you said i couldn't understand the distinction between the alleged wars on women...that is what the OP is about and what you were talking about for dozens of posts. i referred to it that way many times and you responded many times. now, because you're embarrassed by your idiocy, you're now moving the goal posts with the hope no one remembers what you wrote a few hours ago.

your take on my logic is truly retarded. i never said any such thing. your dumb premise is that because maher is a comedian, his whole show much be comedy. you are beyond dumb onceler. you are without hope.

once agaion....how is "no war on women"equal no distinction? poor onceler.
Click to expand...

Good golly, Yurtsie - the post you cited backed up exactly what I said: you can't grasp the distinction between name-calling & policy.

Please stop being so stupid. What's the matter w/ you? Really?

And I posted your logic verbatim. I'm sure it must look ridiculous to you in the light of day.
 
tell me onceler....the name calling and policy...what is the description used by some for that? could it be "war on women"?

LOL

and again...how does my saying "there is no war on women" equal i can't grasp the distinction? this is the light of day and onceler and i feel very bad for you.
 
Just to spell it out for you slowly, Yurt - and I'm pulling for you on this one:

2nd post you cited: "I said you couldn't make the distinction between comedians calling names, and politicians setting policy. And you can't."

1st post - where you said I "couldn't remember" what I wrote: "The OP claims to talk about the "real" war on women, and then proceeded to talk about comedians calling people names.

The "real" war on women has to do with policy."

Like I said, I'm pulling for you. I said the same thing, ya idjit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top