PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Don't we basically do that now for most of the uninsured?
no that I'm aware of, do you have something that indicates otherwise?.....
Don't we basically do that now for most of the uninsured?
no that I'm aware of, do you have something that indicates otherwise?.....
The year prior to the ACA 2/3rds of all bankruptcy filings were for medical/health emergencies. Health care is not a commodity to be traded to the highest bidder. No one should go broke because they got hurt or sick.
yeah... everyone else should pay for them.
There was a study that put the figure at an extra $1,017 for the average US family to pay for healthcare for the uninsured.
There was a study that put the figure at an extra $1,017 for the average US family to pay for healthcare for the uninsured.
If life insurance companies were required to pay a death benefit, even if the payee had no policy, then yes....life insurance should be mandated.As people like Mutt have stated, the reason they want Universal care or at least the Obama care is because of the potential devastating costs of health care for those that get hit with the likes of Cancer. They often tell us about the number of bankruptcies due to that turn of bad luck.
Should we also provide life insurance for everyone? Mandate it? Is not a family equally devastated by a traffic fatality of the prime income earner?
As people like Mutt have stated, the reason they want Universal care or at least the Obama care is because of the potential devastating costs of health care for those that get hit with the likes of Cancer. They often tell us about the number of bankruptcies due to that turn of bad luck.
Should we also provide life insurance for everyone? Mandate it? Is not a family equally devastated by a traffic fatality of the prime income earner?
As people like Mutt have stated, the reason they want Universal care or at least the Obama care is because of the potential devastating costs of health care for those that get hit with the likes of Cancer. They often tell us about the number of bankruptcies due to that turn of bad luck.
Should we also provide life insurance for everyone? Mandate it? Is not a family equally devastated by a traffic fatality of the prime income earner?
I believe the study noted that insurance supposedly costs that much because of the "free" care the uninsured obtained. Basically we pay it in insurance premiums.
There isn't another advanced economy in the world that doesn't have some form of universal healthcare apart from the US.
That is correct. Not that I see a big difference.
There isn't another advanced economy in the world that doesn't have some form of universal healthcare apart from the US.
If this simply covered the "uninsured" and we paid it more directly I would agree. Instead they took direct action to make my insurance suck with huge deductibles, etc at the same time they took away HSAs...
All these waivers are reminiscent of the waivers granted to get around directive 10-289 in Atlas Shrugged. They seem to go to those who support the Pres. (Unions) while punish those who don't have "pull"...
Oh, dear. An Ayn Rand reference.
Not true. Wellpoint had a 30+% increase in Cal. long before Obamacare. The increases you now see are still due to the fact that there is no control over what insurers can charge.
The waiver thing again? Jesus. And you coupled it with an Atlas Shrugged reference. Awesomesauce.
Are you a clone or can you come up with an idea that Onceler hasn't already posted?