It's amazing that you have managed to divert this thread in any direction other than the OP's topic sentence. A sentence which infuriated you:
“The women’s movement had already paved the way, I think, for my coming,” she said.
Now why would this infuriate anyone and send them spiraling into denial? Why are you so invested in denying any good on the part of the women's movement? Why are you enraged that Doctor Ride, a pioneer, believed that the women's movement did her some good? The answer is plain and undeniable. I always knew you hated women and it's never hard to expose you frustrated goons.
Now before you diverted into yet another tirade, you made this claim:
Yep, the only reason she went into space was because of Betty Friedman, despite the fact that Valentina Tereshkova went into space in 1963 the same year The Feminine Mystique was published.
Sally Ride never mentioned Betty Friedan (You don't even know her name Cliffie). She spoke of the women's movement paving the way for her. She also did not say that the women's movement was the only reason she went into space. The women's movement, like the civil rights movement, can only level out the playing field to a certain degree (neither have to this day accomplished a completely level playing field). It opens opportunity. It does not make someone "go into space". That takes first of all, genius, which Doctor Ride possessed, a dream, and a lot of hard work. When you have all of that and are denied the opportunity to be a CEO or to be a doctor or to be a astronaut, then there is injustice. WHich are the conditions that existed before the second wave.
You also emphasized the year. American second wave feminism is widely held to have began with the JFK report one female inequality and the publication of The Feminine Mystique. Movements like that do not rise up overnight, there were of course, feminist activists working, struggling, writing, pamphleting, and advocating for years prior to 1961. And Russia is not America.
Simone de Beauvoir published The Second Sex in 1949, and the publication if of this masterpiece of feminist thinking is always marked as the beginning of the global second wave. So your dates are meaningless Claven.
Your attacks on her, which you no doubt got out of your intellectual bible, the Daily Male, are irrelevant to any of the above facts. As is Sartre's height, I hate to inform you. He was one of the father's of French Existentialism and a brilliant philosopher regardless of how tall he was or what the internet's Cliff Claven thinks of him.
BTW, when you study de Beauvoir and her work at the university level, how her sexual exploitation of her young students (they were teens, usually around 16 and 17, she was not a "pedophile" and the age of consent in France is 15) can be reconciled with her writings. It's a fascinating debate to have but not with a woman-hating grump who has a chip on his shoulder the size of Mt Rushmore.