Sally Ride

Aoxomoxoa said:
Mott, what the fuck is wrong with you? My only criteria is whether it is right or wrong and it is most definitely wrong. To justify it by saying that men had special privileges before is just barking mad.
Click to expand...

Let me tell you what's wrong with Mott Cliffie. He's getting laid regularly and isn't walking around with a two-ton chip on his shoulder towards women.

Take note.
 
Darla said:
I've tried telling people that Tom is an MRA, a Male Right's Activist but they usually don't know what that means.

Now with his rape bullshit you are seeing the ugly underbelly. Women get special treatment in rape cases. How does that taste ladies? You like that? How about men who love a rape victim. You like that?

I'm glad. It should be exposed. I picked it up right away because he has been using coded language directly from MRA sites for some time. And it is a very ugly, highly misogynistic movement.
Click to expand...

MRA? Are you fucking kidding me? I had no idea there was an actual term for these poor oppressed guys....
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
Yes, it's gone from wanting equality to wanting to be granted special privileges and it is 100% wrong. There has been any number of case where a man has been accused of rape and because of the publicity loses his job, marriage and children yet is subsequently proved innocent. There is no way that can be justified as far as I'm concerned. When I get a chance I will turn to the subject of Family Courts in the UK. I am going swimming now with my son down at the university sports centre.

As a total aside, did you see the thread I posted about Bradley Wiggins?
Click to expand...

Spare us your ugly rants about UK law, no one here gives a shit.

If you are beginning a spiral into lecturing the bitches about rape, you'll go on IA. That will simply enrage me to the point that people will get off on it.

And there is no talking to a woman-hating MRA who believes that men are the victims of the bitches and their false rape claims. Best to let them jerk off onto each other. There are so few of them, relatively speaking, and God knows none of them have women. They have each other. It's best to keep it confined in the MRA circle jerk.
 
Bijou said:
MRA? Are you fucking kidding me? I had no idea there was an actual term for these poor oppressed guys....
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'll send you links to some of their sites. It's very good to know about because these fuckers all use the same language and you can see them a mile away. Tom is not an intellectual, nor even a pseudo intellectual, which would be a huge step up for him actually.

He's an MRA lifting shit straight out of their propaganda and has been for some time. As I've pointed out before, many times. And been ignore.d
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
Let's just take one of those issues namely rape. Under the last Labour government the definition of rape was changed from penetrative sex only to include what had previously been termed sexual assault. This was done purely and simply as a political imperative to increase the number of convictions. They also decided to keep the woman's identity secret whilst allowing the Press to publish the man's name. This was ostensibly to allow other women to come forward, yet there is no other crime than permits this type of gross inequality under the law. I believe that in the US it would be deemed unconstitutional. The Coalition wanted to change this when they came in but backed down because they were attacked by a variety of single issue groups. There are many more aspects of British law I could highlight but they can wait for now.
Click to expand...

This is 'gross enquality' in your view? Really?
 
Darla said:
Yeah, I'll send you links to some of their sites. It's very good to know about because these fuckers all use the same language and you can see them a mile away. Tom is not an intellectual, nor even a pseudo intellectual, which would be a huge step up for him actually.

He's an MRA lifting shit straight out of their propaganda and has been for some time. As I've pointed out before, many times. And been ignore.d
Click to expand...

Post the links right out in the open. This I gotta see.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
Yes, it's gone from wanting equality to wanting to be granted special privileges and it is 100% wrong. There has been any number of case where a man has been accused of rape and because of the publicity loses his job, marriage and children yet is subsequently proved innocent. There is no way that can be justified as far as I'm concerned. When I get a chance I will turn to the subject of Family Courts in the UK. I am going swimming now with my son down at the university sports centre.
Click to expand...

Wow, what horror. Special privileges for rape victims. What might those be? Please link to a source listing them.

And surely you can cite these numerous cases of injustice for all these poor men being victimized by women falsely crying rape. "Any number" of them. Let's see those. Must be hundreds of them.
 
Bijou said:
Post the links right out in the open. This I gotta see.
Click to expand...

Probably the most notorious, the reddit site: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/

http://www.the-spearhead.com/

http://www.avoiceformen.com/

I like to read Man Boobz because he mocks them mercilessly and he is hysterical and often they get so enraged they come over there to call him fat. LOL

http://manboobz.com/

If you read Manboobz semi-regularly you'll be able to keep up with the sickos without actually wading in them. And it's always good for some laughs.
 
Bijou said:
Wow, what horror. Special privileges for rape victims. What might those be? Please link to a source listing them.

And surely you can cite these numerous cases of injustice for all these poor men being victimized by women falsely crying rape. "Any number" of them. Let's see those. Must be hundreds of them.
Click to expand...

duke lacross team.....
 
Darla said:
Spare us your ugly rants about UK law, no one here gives a shit.

If you are beginning a spiral into lecturing the bitches about rape, you'll go on IA. That will simply enrage me to the point that people will get off on it.

And there is no talking to a woman-hating MRA who believes that men are the victims of the bitches and their false rape claims. Best to let them jerk off onto each other. There are so few of them, relatively speaking, and God knows none of them have women. They have each other. It's best to keep it confined in the MRA circle jerk.
Click to expand...

another vile meltdown.
 
Darla said:
Probably the most notorious, the reddit site: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/

http://www.the-spearhead.com/

http://www.avoiceformen.com/

I like to read Man Boobz because he mocks them mercilessly and he is hysterical and often they get so enraged they come over there to call him fat. LOL

http://manboobz.com/

If you read Manboobz semi-regularly you'll be able to keep up with the sickos without actually wading in them. And it's always good for some laughs.
Click to expand...

Reading the mission on 'A Voice For Men', I got the gist of why Tom was whining about misandry on the 'misogyny' thread. What a bunch of whiners. Here's a snippet from AVFM's 'mission' - get a load of this:

It is AVfM’s mission to facilitate the following:



The dissemination of information that will expose misandry on all levels in our culture.

To denounce the institution of marriage as unsafe and unsuitable for modern men, and to promote awareness of information designed to protect men who are already married.

To promote an end to chivalry in any form or fashion.

To promote the legal and nonviolent antagonism of all agents of misandry, from members of academe, to holders of public office, to law enforcement and other state functionaries, to popular bloggers and to corporate agents who promote misandry for profit.

To support peaceful acts of civil disobedience when necessary

To educate men and boys about the threats they face in feminist governance and to promote an end to that governance.

To debunk the lies and distortions of misandry and feminist governance wherever they occur.

To offer a more reasoned, cogent and intellectually honest view of sexual politics.

To address the variety of problems faced by men and boys under feminist governance and attempt to ameliorate those problems.

To push for an end to rape hysteria, DV hysteria and false allegations.

To promote a culture that values equal treatment under the law for all human beings.
Click to expand...

That is some funny shit right there.

I bolded the exceptionally hysterical or otherwise laughable 'objectives'.

Tom - you've been outed as a girly-man.

:rofl2:
 
Darla said:
Yeah, I'll send you links to some of their sites. It's very good to know about because these fuckers all use the same language and you can see them a mile away. Tom is not an intellectual, nor even a pseudo intellectual, which would be a huge step up for him actually.

He's an MRA lifting shit straight out of their propaganda and has been for some time. As I've pointed out before, many times. And been ignore.d
Click to expand...
Include me in that please...Thanks in advance.
 
Bijou said:
Reading the mission on 'A Voice For Men', I got the gist of why Tom was whining about misandry on the 'misogyny' thread. What a bunch of whiners. Here's a snippet from AVFM's 'mission' - get a load of this:



That is some funny shit right there.

I bolded the exceptionally hysterical or otherwise laughable 'objectives'.

Tom - you've been outed as a girly-man.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Yeah anytime I see a man write the word misandry it's an alarm bell going off. I've never actually heard a man speak the word. Thank God I don't know these kind of assholes IRL. They're the kind of guys who complain about women getting half priced drinks on Ladies Night. Hot huh? I've heard about them, in fact they make fun of the Ladies Nights whiners on WBAB radio station out here, but I've never actually heard a man complain about that. I guess the men I know actually have sex. That stuff is funny. As you point out in some of your highlighted items, it gets a lot less funny.
 
Darla said:
Yeah anytime I see a man write the word misandry it's an alarm bell going off. I've never actually heard a man speak the word. Thank God I don't know these kind of assholes IRL. They're the kind of guys who complain about women getting half priced drinks on Ladies Night. Hot huh? I've heard about them, in fact they make fun of the Ladies Nights whiners on WBAB radio station out here, but I've never actually heard a man complain about that. I guess the men I know actually have sex. That stuff is funny. As you point out in some of your highlighted items, it gets a lot less funny.
Click to expand...

Insecure, frustrated men who perceive themselves as victimized by women who are on a level playing field with them believe at their core to be inadequate - that's why they prefer a game rigged in their favor. That perception of inadequacy already existed, but they found emancipated females and the feminist movement as easy scapegoats.

Good for Tom that he has found a coalition of like-minded 'victims' so he doesn't have to feel alone in his neurosis. To become a whole person, let alone a real man, he'll have to eventually take responsibility for whatever he will or won't bring to the table in a relationship, and abandon the myth that it's the counterpart that completes him.
 
Darla said:
Spare us your ugly rants about UK law, no one here gives a shit.

If you are beginning a spiral into lecturing the bitches about rape, you'll go on IA. That will simply enrage me to the point that people will get off on it.

And there is no talking to a woman-hating MRA who believes that men are the victims of the bitches and their false rape claims. Best to let them jerk off onto each other. There are so few of them, relatively speaking, and God knows none of them have women. They have each other. It's best to keep it confined in the MRA circle jerk.
Click to expand...

Your arrogance is beyond breathtaking, if it was the other way round you would be bellyaching about it from here to christendom. Thanks for showing your true colours, you are not in the least interested in equality otherwise how could you support a law that is so biased towards one party? You then go on to compound the crime by insisting that the sistas would never make false allegations despite the fact that there have been any number of high profile cases in the UK in recent years. I doubt that it is any different in the US but no doubt you will insist otherwise. Ignorance and arrogance, in equal measure, a toxic combination.

If you want to put me on IA then go right ahead because I find it very hard to talk to you civilly any more, I had forgotten how hard it is to talk to a hardcore feminazi.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top