Many democrats did not support the civil rights movement

[Cancel 2018. 3]

true story. people from both parties resisted it and the most anti civil rights senator was a democrat.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Well no shit captain obvious. More than 30% of the Democratic party were white Dixiecrat southern conservatives back in the 60's who converted to Republicans in mass during the 70's and 80's.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

why do you try to put lipstick on a pig? i fail to see why liberals get so defensive about their past....

 

[Mott the Hoople]

why do you try to put lipstick on a pig? i fail to see why liberals get so defensive about their past....

Because youre making a dishonest argument that could only fool a southern conservative.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

what is dishonest about what i said? be specific mott.

 

[zappasguitar]

what is dishonest about what i said? be specific mott.

Let the YurTard word parsing and hair splitting begin.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Well no shit captain obvious. More than 30% of the Democratic party were white Dixiecrat southern conservatives back in the 60's who converted to Republicans in mass during the 70's and 80's.

Where is the proof of this mass exodus. You claim it but never prove it.

Cite voter registration data

 

[zappasguitar]

Where is the proof of this mass exodus. You claim it but never prove it.

Cite voter registration data

Someone as oblivious to one of the watershed events of the 60's as ILA demonstrates OBVIOUSLY isn't going to accept evidence of ANY kind.

You'll merely pooh pooh any "evidence" provided and claim it doesn't meet your requirements.

The fact remains that the Democrats of the 60's migrated to the Republican party following implementation of the civil rights act...your obstinate denial notwithstanding

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Someone as oblivious to one of the watershed events of the 60's as ILA demonstrates OBVIOUSLY isn't going to accept evidence of ANY kind.

You'll merely pooh pooh any "evidence" provided and claim it doesn't meet your requirements.

The fact remains that the Democrats of the 60's migrated to the Republican party following implementation of the civil rights act...your obstinate denial notwithstanding

Then you should be able to prove it with voter registration data

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Let the YurTard word parsing and hair splitting begin.

i asked a simple question, no derision and no insults and what do you respond with:

nothing but derision and insults

typical

 

[zappasguitar]

Then you should be able to prove it with voter registration data

I shouldn't NEED to retrieve voter registration data to prove it.

It's common knowledge.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

I shouldn't NEED to retrieve voter registration data to prove it.

It's common knowledge.

Translation: you can't back it up.

 

[zappasguitar]

i asked a simple question, no derision and no insults and what do you respond with:

nothing but derision and insults

typical

That isn't Yurt whining about another poster responding with insults and derision, is it?

It couldn't be...he has claimed numerous times he doesn't whine about insults and derision.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

is there a reason you can't answer the question zappa? afraid?

 

[zappasguitar]

is there a reason you can't answer the question zappa? afraid?

Because your thread title clearly indicates you aren't interested in an honest discussion of the facts, just in smearing Liberals once again and I refuse to get involved in another round and round word parsing game with you.

 

[wanderingbear]

true story. people from both parties resisted it and the most anti civil rights senator was a democrat.

Things have changed since the civil rights movement.

 

[Banned]

Many/most? White churches in the south opposed civil rights/desegregation.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Many/most? White churches in the south opposed civil rights/desegregation.

yes they did. what do you think of the dems who opposed civil rights and desegregation?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Things have changed since the civil rights movement.

yes they have. what is your point?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Because your thread title clearly indicates you aren't interested in an honest discussion of the facts, just in smearing Liberals once again and I refuse to get involved in another round and round word parsing game with you.

how does my thread title indicate i'm not interested in an honest discussion? did i not say that both sides resisted it?

tell me exactly what i said that is not honest. my thread title is 100% accurate and so is my OP. perhaps you can put down the hater bong and simply address the thread and not spout your hate.