Explaining women in combat arms

Aoxomoxoa said:
You know Howey, you can be pretty fucking patronising as well as incredibly opinionated. I called you out before on your posting graphic images of men giving BJs to other men. You were given a pass by the powers that be and the women on here, fuck knows why. I am not sure what -ism that trangesses as there are so fucking many these days but it was certainly nasty, tasteless and incredibly disgusting so take your faux anger and shove it up your arse.

I really do not know what your purpose is being here anyway, if it is to drum up custom for your dying board then I can only say that I for one won't be posting over there if the likes of Bijou are typical posters. You can call me all the names that you like, I have been called virtually everything over the years, by left and right, but very few call me stupid and uneducated. As for other Brits, I have heard that one before as well. It was said by a right wing female poster called usloyaltotheend who accused me of being too politically correct, anti-American and not like all her other Brit friends.
Click to expand...

Dude...I called you a misogynist. That's not an opinion.

It's a fact based upon your words.

And what's so bad about posting pics of scantily clad men? Aren't there pics of scantily clad women posted on this forum?
 
Howey. said:
Dude...I called you a misogynist. That's not an opinion.

It's a fact based upon your words.

And what's so bad about posting pics of scantily clad men? Aren't there pics of scantily clad women posted on this forum?
Click to expand...

Yes but those are good because men objectifying women serves as a reminder to other women that they are objects and better look good and STFU.

Whereas posting pictures of two hot guys engaging in sexual activity doesn't do anything to keep the bitches in line, and also, they are afraid that "it will move" while they are looking at the pics. It's all very George Costanza.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you said that they were disposable and needed no training.....one might think that training them to survive long enough to kill some more might be called for......
Click to expand...

Nice way to parse words to meet your needs. Here's what I said:

Howey. said:
Let me repeat this one more time, as the issue's causing confusion.

Seals, Rangers, etc., are not front line troops. The front line troops are the grunts. They require no more training than how to shoot a rifle and kill someone. They are, given their mission, disposable.

Why waste the money giving them expensive training?
Click to expand...
 
christiefan915 said:
Yet the way we fight wars is changing, too. I think Howey had it right when he said pretty soon it's all going to happen with computers (paraphrasing).
Click to expand...

You are ignoring a vital part of this argument, which is the physical entry requirements for service in front line infantry. I haven't seen anybody say that women are not able to enter or are unqualified for virtually any other Military Occupation Specialty (MOS), if they have then I've missed it. I have also noticed that many people are also against drones, in the mistaken belief that boots on the ground is somehow more surgical and precise, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
 
Howey. said:
Dude...I called you a misogynist. That's not an opinion.

It's a fact based upon your words.

And what's so bad about posting pics of scantily clad men? Aren't there pics of scantily clad women posted on this forum?
Click to expand...

I don't recall anybody on here posting pictures of women fellating men and I'm pretty damn sure they would be booted off PDQ if they did. For some reason. which I have never been able to ascertain, you seem to have been afforded special privileges by the mods, maybe they feel sorry for you because your forum is on it's last legs. So excuse me if I kindly ask you to go fuck yourself and take your pathetic accusations with you, I haven't banned you yet but that can be arranged.
 
Last edited:
Aoxomoxoa said:
You are ignoring a vital part of this argument, which is the physical entry requirements for service in front line infantry. I haven't seen anybody say that women are not able to enter or are unqualified for virtually any other Military Occupation Specialty (MOS), if they have then I've missed it. I have also noticed that many people are also against drones, in the mistaken belief that boots on the ground is somehow more surgical and precise, despite all the evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...

HOw is that a vital part of this argument? Hilarious. It's actually the most senseless part of the argument because the Pengaton has specifically stated they will not lower those standards. So any woman who can't meet them won't be permitted into combat. So this "Vital" part of the argument is irrelevant. It makes no sense. Not surprising the board blowhard finds it "vital".

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...-combat-world-australia-israel-canada-norway/

A very interesting artice about other countries who already allow women into combat, their experiences and outcomes, and how the US is studying them.
 
Sativa said:
howey posted porn on this site and grind gave him a pass....yeah...he is part of darla's posse
Click to expand...

He did and I posted the mods several times and they chose to totally ignore it. What's more Darla and her cohorts chose also to say nothing, presumably because Howey is gay and it is an unwritten rule that gays can do no wrong.
 
Actually I hadn't seen Howey's post. I miss a lot here. But after Tom reported it Grind did send it to me and ask what I thought. So I looked and told him I thought the pics were pretty hot. He said "hmm, okay". And that was the last I heard of it.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
He did and I posted the mods several times and they chose to totally ignore it. What's more Darla and her cohorts chose also to say nothing, presumably because Howey is gay and it is an unwritten rule that gays can do no wrong.
Click to expand...

he is a liberal, has nothing to do with him being gay. if he was a gay conservative, darla would command grind and her fellow posse to gang up on him and try to get him banned. she is nothing short of a hateful bitch. i can't believe one day we were actually friends during WW, then the next she doesn't agree with my political beliefs and suddenly i'm satan. she is crazy and unfortunately, grind is smitten with her. it is what it is.
 
Sativa said:
he is a liberal, has nothing to do with him being gay. if he was a gay conservative, darla would command grind and her fellow posse to gang up on him and try to get him banned. she is nothing short of a hateful bitch. i can't believe one day we were actually friends during WW, then the next she doesn't agree with my political beliefs and suddenly i'm satan. she is crazy and unfortunately, grind is smitten with her. it is what it is.
Click to expand...

They were pretty explicit in my opinion, if a man had posted a woman sucking a cock they would out the door PDQ. I used to think that Grind was cruel but fair, but he is not even fair these days!!
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
They were pretty explicit in my opinion, if a man had posted a woman sucking a cock they would out the door PDQ. I used to think that Grind was cruel but fair, but he is not even fair these days!!
Click to expand...

when darla is not around, grind is actually a cool guy...when darla is around...grind is a different guy

true, but sad
 
SR_ said:
You think having a Marine wounded on the ground, and having a woman who is not physically able to carry him to safety is justified so that a woman can avoid sexual misconduct?
Click to expand...

I expect there are women out there who would put a bullet in the crotch of a Marine who tendered unwanted sexual advances and still be willing to drag his ass to a corpsman so he could get medical attention.......
 
NOVA said:
Unless of course shes trying to kill you.
Click to expand...

cawacko said:
Save me "the right" bullshit. I'm asking as my own person, not as a member of a political party of political group. To not want to see a woman die in combat has nothing to do with my political beliefs plus I already have stated that if a woman wants to go to the front lines and can pass the physical test then I support. Hey, I'll be the first to celebrate during the next war when more woman have been killed than men in combat. That will be true equality.

So if a woman attacked and robbed you and was doing serious physical harm to you you would just sit there and take it, risking death, out of respect? I would love to see that on YouTube.
Click to expand...

Wait. Are we speaking about women in combat or in a domestic situation? Assuming none of you would be silly enough to equate women (or men) in a combat situation using their hands to engage an opponent, I assumed you were speaking about a domestic situation.

In that regard, should you hit your wife? Still, no. Shield yourself, protect yourself, get away from her...If you're being attacked by a crazed robber? Of course, there's different rules. I just don't see that happening a lot...

Point is, I've never heard of a story of a woman beating her husband to death with her bare hands, so it's pretty rare. I'm confident there are, however, news accounts of men beating their wifes to death with their bare hands.



Aoxomoxoa said:
If a woman attacks you, you have every right to defend yourself. I am just wondering if the "stand your ground" law only applies to men, maybe Howey can tell us as he lives in Florida??
Click to expand...

The Stand Your Ground Law here in Florida is on it's way out. The most recent case of it, used by a woman, was denied. Why? Because she was being abused by her husband. The Fl SYG law, in an incredible display of lack of compassion for women, exempts those situations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top