Did you read the OP?
"“The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.
Instead, it says, an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”"
This crap allows the US Gov't to kill a citizen without there being any clear evidence that a specific attack will take place. You think that is acceptable???
And around my neighborhood most of the folks call me by my first name or call me "sir". But then, you were the one who was going to attack people who legally carried firearms, so I'm sure the things they call you in your neighborhood are funny as hell.