Justice the Hut Shocks Child Care Experts with his Stupidity

Timshel

New member
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-court-gay-parents-20130406,0,2117892.story

WASHINGTON — During last week's Supreme Court arguments on gay marriage, Justice Antonin Scalia asserted that "there's considerable disagreement" among experts over whether "raising a child in a single-sex family is harmful or not." Two other justices agreed that gay parenting was a new and uncertain development.

Those comments startled child development experts as well as advocates of gay marriage, because there is considerable research showing children of gay parents do not have more problems than others.

"This is not a new phenomenon. We have 30 or 40 years of studies, and there has been no hint of a problem," said Dr. Ellen C. Perrin, a professor of pediatrics at the Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center.

"There is a fundamental, scholarly consensus that children raised by same-sex couples do just fine," said Stanford sociologist Michael J. Rosenfeld.

Perrin led a committee that examined research on gay parents and their children for the American Academy of Pediatrics. Its report in March, just before the court arguments, concluded that "children and adolescents who grow up with gay or lesbian parents fare as well in emotional, cognitive, social and sexual functioning as do children whose parents are heterosexual."
 
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-court-gay-parents-20130406,0,2117892.story

WASHINGTON — During last week's Supreme Court arguments on gay marriage, Justice Antonin Scalia asserted that "there's considerable disagreement" among experts over whether "raising a child in a single-sex family is harmful or not." Two other justices agreed that gay parenting was a new and uncertain development.

Those comments startled child development experts as well as advocates of gay marriage, because there is considerable research showing children of gay parents do not have more problems than others.

"This is not a new phenomenon. We have 30 or 40 years of studies, and there has been no hint of a problem," said Dr. Ellen C. Perrin, a professor of pediatrics at the Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center.

"There is a fundamental, scholarly consensus that children raised by same-sex couples do just fine," said Stanford sociologist Michael J. Rosenfeld.

Perrin led a committee that examined research on gay parents and their children for the American Academy of Pediatrics. Its report in March, just before the court arguments, concluded that "children and adolescents who grow up with gay or lesbian parents fare as well in emotional, cognitive, social and sexual functioning as do children whose parents are heterosexual."


You want to compare 30 years of small numbers with thousands of years of human experience?

Don't be so infantile.

Queers have no more business raising children than pedophiles.
 
I like the argument that homosexual couples seeking to have children are far more likely to be engaged parents than heterosexual couples based on the intent to be parents, which is often missing with heterosexual couples who admit that children were unplanned.

This makes sense. Score 1 for gay marriage. People loving their kids is good.

Look at this awful woman who admits regret over having kids. Great mom!
http://thestir.cafemom.com/pregnancy/153635/mother_of_two_who_admits

Hetero marriage 0 points


Gay marriage wins this one!
 
I like the argument that homosexual couples seeking to have children are far more likely to be engaged parents than heterosexual couples based on the intent to be parents, which is often missing with heterosexual couples who admit that children were unplanned.

This makes sense. Score 1 for gay marriage. People loving their kids is good.

Look at this awful woman who admits regret over having kids. Great mom!
http://thestir.cafemom.com/pregnancy/153635/mother_of_two_who_admits

Hetero marriage 0 points


Gay marriage wins this one!

Well one anecdotal story trumps thousands of years of human experience.
 
Well one anecdotal story trumps thousands of years of human experience.

You certainly seemed willing to accept patriot's anecdotal story of the anonymous radio caller.

But it isn't one anecdotal story. It is research done over decades. It is comparing the lives of children raised by gay couples, straight couples and singles. It is interviewing thousands of children & parents.

The idea that you have thousands of years of human experience is only saying you have that much on straight couples. You have little or nothing, negative or positive, on gay couples raising children.

Well, you do have thousands of years of evidence that straight couples conceived, bore and raised gay children.
 
You certainly seemed willing to accept patriot's anecdotal story of the anonymous radio caller.

But it isn't one anecdotal story. It is research done over decades. It is comparing the lives of children raised by gay couples, straight couples and singles. It is interviewing thousands of children & parents.

The idea that you have thousands of years of human experience is only saying you have that much on straight couples. You have little or nothing, negative or positive, on gay couples raising children.

Well, you do have thousands of years of evidence that straight couples conceived, bore and raised gay children.

A) I don't recall accepting anyone's anecdotal story other than being what it was

B) homos have much more unstable households than straight couples

C) the studies are too small to make any conclusions

D) you nimrods think single motherhood is a good thing and that ain't working out so well
 
It is bad enough queers make a shitty lifestyle choice no parent would ever wish for them but why do they allow their narcissism to fuck up the life of some poor child? Are they wanna be Madonna's or Rosie Odonnell's?
 
Gays give love to the children breeders don't want.
Disease Spreaders (homosexuals & reckless breeders) are a negative influence on children. Thank God for responsible, loving, heterosexual parents. We were the first, and we are by far the best.
 
Disease Spreaders (homosexuals & reckless breeders) are a negative influence on children. Thank God for responsible, loving, heterosexual parents. We were the first, and we are by far the best.

Yeah, the many children who are without parents are not choosing between heterosexual or homosexual couples. Homosexual couples offer them opportunities for a family they would not otherwise have. So your contest is irrelevant and only intended to feed your pathetic ego.
 
Disease Spreaders (homosexuals & reckless breeders) are a negative influence on children. Thank God for responsible, loving, heterosexual parents. We were the first, and we are by far the best.

Hate-filled perverted bigots are a far greater and numerous influence on children.
 
Yeah, the many children who are without parents are not choosing between heterosexual or homosexual couples. Homosexual couples offer them opportunities for a family they would not otherwise have. So your contest is irrelevant and only intended to feed your pathetic ego.
Anything aside from what I just described, spells disaster for children. No matter how you slice it, in the hands of your side, they have little to zero hope.
 
Back
Top