Or it could be that their funds were frozen and they became desperate...
That's possible. But I'd assume an organized outfit would have lots of cash on hand.
Or it could be that their funds were frozen and they became desperate...
You guys are both missing the point. On day one, nobody knew anything but there was immediate speculation the bomber was Muslim and no speculation that the mailer was Muslim. Why so? That's all I want to know, why didn't anyone speculate the mailer was Muslim?
FB has nothing to do with anything because on day one we didn't even have a name, let alone knowledge about FB postings.
I remember a whole lot of speculation and desires for the bomber to be white guy.You guys are both missing the point. On day one, nobody knew anything but there was immediate speculation the bomber was Muslim and no speculation that the mailer was Muslim. Why so? That's all I want to know, why didn't anyone speculate the mailer was Muslim?
I remember a whole lot of speculation and desires for the bomber to be white guy.
I remember a whole lot of speculation and desires for the bomber to be white guy.
I don't believe I saw the word "Christian" even once in all the news reports about the ricin mailer.
They wanted it to be a white American and I'm going to surmise a born and raised white American.
You guys are both missing the point. On day one, nobody knew anything but there was immediate speculation the bomber was Muslim and no speculation that the mailer was Muslim. Why so? That's all I want to know, why didn't anyone speculate the mailer was Muslim?
FB has nothing to do with anything because on day one we didn't even have a name, let alone knowledge about FB postings.
I don't know what you wanted Cawacko, but what I didn't want was reactionary hate, revenge, war, violent anti-immigrant sentiment and legislation, violent anti-Muslim sentiment and action, patriot act style legislation, etc.
And cause I've lived in this country for a while, I know that's what I would get. Maybe you are new here. Now, it's a white american guy? A bunch of lefties make fun of teapartiers and we execute the murderer.
Big fucking difference.
Because the marathon bombing had signs of being an Islamic terrorist type attack. The richin not so much. Am I off on this or missing something here?
Edit: It also reasons to me if you are anti-government you would attack a government related entity of some sort.
I don't know what you wanted Cawacko, but what I didn't want was reactionary hate, revenge, war, violent anti-immigrant sentiment and legislation, violent anti-Muslim sentiment and action, patriot act style legislation, etc.
And cause I've lived in this country for a while, I know that's what I would get. Maybe you are new here. Now, it's a white american guy? A bunch of lefties make fun of teapartiers and we execute the murderer.
Big fucking difference.
That's because his bumper sticker said Democrat and a Christian!
I don't know what you wanted Cawacko, but what I didn't want was reactionary hate, revenge, war, violent anti-immigrant sentiment and legislation, violent anti-Muslim sentiment and action, patriot act style legislation, etc.
And cause I've lived in this country for a while, I know that's what I would get. Maybe you are new here. Now, it's a white american guy? A bunch of lefties make fun of teapartiers and we execute the murderer.
Big fucking difference.
A sampling of "Christian" bombings where the word "Christian" was never used to describe them. It's really tiresome to read all the Muslim hate (not from you) when foreigners do the bombing. It's never "Saudi bomber, Chechen bomber, Palestinian bomber, etc.", always "Muslim bomber." But if it's an American he's never ever described as a "Christian bomber." The link lists 23 of the worst bombings since the late 1800s. Only five were Muslim-related but the Muslim ones got the disproportionate amount of attention and hate.
My opinion is that people need to get a grip on their Muslim bigotry and look at these heinous acts simply as terrorism without automatically attaching religion to it.
— Jan. 17, 2011: A backpack bomb is placed along a Martin Luther King Day parade route in Spokane, Wash., meant to kill and injure participants in a civil rights march, but is found and disabled before it can explode. White supremacist Kevin Harpham is convicted and sentenced to 32 years in federal prison.
— Jan 22, 1998: Theodore Kaczynski pleads guilty in Sacramento, Calif., to being the Unabomber in return for a sentence of life in prison without parole. He's locked up in the federal Supermax prison in Colorado for killing three people and injuring 23 during a nationwide bombing spree between 1978 and 1995.
— Jan. 20, 1998: A bombing at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Ala., kills one guard and injures a nurse. Eric Robert Rudolph is suspected in the case.
— July 27, 1996: A bomb explodes at Centennial Olympic Park in Atlanta during the Summer Games, killing two people and injuring more than 100. Eric Robert Rudolph is arrested in 2003. He pleads guilty and is sentenced to life in prison.
— April 19, 1995: A car bomb parked outside the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City kills 168 people and injures more than 500. It is the deadliest U.S. bombing in 75 years. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols are convicted. McVeigh is executed in 2001 and Nichols is sentenced to life in prison.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/1...famous-attempts-that-failed-since-late-1800s/
To the best of my knowledge there is no previous incidents of Muslims mailing ricin, so I guess that is the reason.
What about the 7/7 bombings?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2005/london_explosions/default.stm
You guys are both missing the point. On day one, nobody knew anything but there was immediate speculation the bomber was Muslim and no speculation that the mailer was Muslim. Why so? That's all I want to know, why didn't anyone speculate the mailer was Muslim?
It does seem like the right doesn't really get the difference on this.
Anyone who commits this kind of atrocity is a nut, period. When there was all of the outcry about the guy in the AZ shooting being a "rightie", it was more to do w/ the rhetoric that came from fools like Palin and campaigns that used crosshairs to target incumbents that caused concern. It wasn't "well, this is a Tea Partier, so all Tea Partiers are like this."
When it's a Muslim, it DOES become "well, this is what Muslims do." We see an endless stream of threads citing the "religion of peace," and painting the entire religion w/ the brush created by a couple of lunatics. And those who subscribe to that faith really feel it, on a very pracitcal & threatening level.
Other than wanting the people caught I never gave much real thought to who I wanted to be the perpretraitors (sp).