More People Collecting Food Stamps in the US Than Living in Spain

The so called safety net has become a King size Select Comfort bed

Which is it?

Obama and his supporters are always talking about the "recovery" we are in

But when economic facts are presented, the same people tell us how many "poor" people there are and how they need "help"

It is human nature if you pay people not to work or to remain poor - they will stay unemployed and poor

So ...apparently the solution is to get rid of the minimum wage and welfare....brilliant.
 
So ...apparently the solution is to get rid of the minimum wage and welfare....brilliant.

You would be amazed how motivated people would be when the handouts stop and they have to go out and earn some money

The obvious solution is not too have Obama economic policies that reward the takers and punish the producers

But you still did not answer the question

Which is it?

Obama and his supporters are always talking about the "recovery" we are in

But when economic facts are presented, the same people tell us how many "poor" people there are and how they need "help"
 
You would be amazed how motivated people would be when the handouts stop and they have to go out and earn some money

The obvious solution is not too have Obama economic policies that reward the takers and punish the producers

But you still did not answer the question

Which is it?

Obama and his supporters are always talking about the "recovery" we are in

But when economic facts are presented, the same people tell us how many "poor" people there are and how they need "help"

Well, that's one theory.... another is we'll have people starving in the streets in the wealthiest country in the world.

To answer your question....it's both.

Things are slowly getting better. But that doesn't mean that people aren't jobless or underemployed.

How about you answering a question for me now....

Why is it that you're OK with blaming only the poor for the welfare situation? Why is none of your ire directed at the people who benefit most from the safety net, in fact...you want them to benefit more by eliminating the minimum wage.

You see, when government makes up the difference for shitty wages with food stamps, subsidized housing and Medicaid.... that's coming out of our pockets as taxpayers. Your side keeps telling me that if they paid good wages, then prices would go up....well...add the cost of those programs onto the price of goods, and they're already up. We just don't see it in the store.
 
Well, that's one theory.... another is we'll have people starving in the streets in the wealthiest country in the world.

To answer your question....it's both.

Things are slowly getting better. But that doesn't mean that people aren't jobless or underemployed.

How about you answering a question for me now....

Why is it that you're OK with blaming only the poor for the welfare situation? Why is none of your ire directed at the people who benefit most from the safety net, in fact...you want them to benefit more by eliminating the minimum wage.

You see, when government makes up the difference for shitty wages with food stamps, subsidized housing and Medicaid.... that's coming out of our pockets as taxpayers. Your side keeps telling me that if they paid good wages, then prices would go up....well...add the cost of those programs onto the price of goods, and they're already up. We just don't see it in the store.

The minimum wage is not needed. The market place should and would dictate what a person is paid. In fact very few people make the minimum wage as those workers are unskilled and doing entry level work

That is the other talking point liberals use that goes against another one of their talking points

For years I have been told how FAT Americans are then the minute you talk about the waste and expanded welfare sate liberals go right to the "people starving in the street" line

I have never seen or read about a fat person starving in the street

Perhaps if Democrats were not so greedy and demanding trillions more in taxes, of if Obamacare was not putting people out of work, or preventing companies from hiring, or if the Obama Regulation Nation were pulled back, or if it were not so easy to go on a government program. - more people would find work

But that would make people self sufficient and not need Democrats and their handouts

Cannot have any of that
 
The so called safety net has become a King size Select Comfort bed

Which is it?

Obama and his supporters are always talking about the "recovery" we are in

But when economic facts are presented, the same people tell us how many "poor" people there are and how they need "help"

It is human nature if you pay people not to work or to remain poor - they will stay unemployed and poor

have you ever been long term unemployed or poor?

you think that it is a free ride and comfortable?

you are sadly deluded if you think so.

until you have been there do not feel free to be critical but be glad that you live in a nation that does not cast its unemployed out into the streets even though some find themselves there despite the so called safety net.

do you wish to cast the first stone or be a parrot of those who did?
 
have you ever been long term unemployed or poor?

you think that it is a free ride and comfortable?

you are sadly deluded if you think so.

until you have been there do not feel free to be critical but be glad that you live in a nation that does not cast its unemployed out into the streets even though some find themselves there despite the so called safety net.

do you wish to cast the first stone or be a parrot of those who did?

Yea, over ONE TRILLION in welfare at the Federal level - and liberals do not see a problem

Again, we are told that we are in a "recovery" yet liberals rant how "poverty" is worse then ever

Which is it?

To me, it is clear liberal love the poor

Their economic policies have created millions more of them

Perhaps if Democrats were not so greedy and demanding trillions more in taxes, of if Obamacare was not putting people out of work, or preventing companies from hiring, or if the Obama Regulation Nation were pulled back, or if it were not so easy to go on a government program. - more people would find work

But that would make people self sufficient and not need Democrats and their handouts

Cannot have any of that
 
Yea, over ONE TRILLION in welfare at the Federal level - and liberals do not see a problem

Again, we are told that we are in a "recovery" yet liberals rant how "poverty" is worse then ever

Which is it?

To me, it is clear liberal love the poor

Their economic policies have created millions more of them

Perhaps if Democrats were not so greedy and demanding trillions more in taxes, of if Obamacare was not putting people out of work, or preventing companies from hiring, or if the Obama Regulation Nation were pulled back, or if it were not so easy to go on a government program. - more people would find work

But that would make people self sufficient and not need Democrats and their handouts

Cannot have any of that

you did not answer any of my questions nor did you provide any facts to back up your claims...or are the opinions and to be treated as such
 
gee you mean your fucks crash the entire world economy and fuck us all and make a bunch of people poor and Obama and us have to help feed the people you assholes made poor and its OUR fault for being decent enough to make sure people eat?


are you people aware how huge a pack of assholes you are?

More revisionist history I see, the housing crisis was due to bleeding heart liberals who thought you should have a house whether you could afford it or not.
 
More revisionist history I see, the housing crisis was due to bleeding heart liberals who thought you should have a house whether you could afford it or not.

THAT is revisionist history. Unless all those bankers and traders were liberals, along with George Bush.
 
have you ever been long term unemployed or poor?

you think that it is a free ride and comfortable?

you are sadly deluded if you think so.

until you have been there do not feel free to be critical but be glad that you live in a nation that does not cast its unemployed out into the streets even though some find themselves there despite the so called safety net.

do you wish to cast the first stone or be a parrot of those who did?

The company I work for started me at just above minimum wage 25 years ago, I worked my but off to keep moving up, and now I make an alright living, as does my wife, we qualified for wic when we first got married, and had children, never took a dime, figured working hard and being good to our employers was the way to go. It worked, now you have people who come to work, and expect to start out making what I do, with a company car and a membership to the country club it does not work that way.
 
THAT is revisionist history. Unless all those bankers and traders were liberals, along with George Bush.

Bush didn't relax the credit ratings for housing, banks did under pressure from liberal community organizers Bush warned them what was coming and barney fwanks pulled a cock out of his mouth long enough to say fannie and fweddie are fine.
 
The company I work for started me at just above minimum wage 25 years ago, I worked my but off to keep moving up, and now I make an alright living, as does my wife, we qualified for wic when we first got married, and had children, never took a dime, figured working hard and being good to our employers was the way to go. It worked, now you have people who come to work, and expect to start out making what I do, with a company car and a membership to the country club it does not work that way.

So do you call yourself a Sanitation Engineer now?
 
No it isn't. There is no war and there's damn near a 100% chance that there will be no war, other than the one you fantasize about in your head.
What did I just tell you, comrade? I said it WILL be, as in future tense, not IS, as in present tense. You see, stupid, it pays to comprehend messages as the actually are, and not as they appear in your half baked brain.

Your choice for president is divisive, and he hates this country. Of course there's going to be war. It's not a matter of IF, but WHEN.
 
What did I just tell you, comrade? I said it WILL be, as in future tense, not IS as in present tense. You see, stupid, it pays to comprehend messages as the actually are, and not as they appear in your half baked brain.

Your choice for president is divisive, and he hates this country. Of course there's going to be war. It's not a matter of IF, but WHEN.

You want to talk to me about comprehension Mr. Loughner? Read the second half of the second sentence.

He doesn't hate this country...that would be you and your itchy trigger finger.!
 
The petty rich bastard are more complain about the millions that welfare cost every year,while at the same time they dump trillions of dollars into the military and fighting illegal and unnecessary wars and keep hounding congress and the president for more more more for war. These war monger conservatives have no place in a free and open society.
 
Back
Top