False Benghazi outrage?

No idiot....it wasn't a lie for anyone. Not all those Democrats that said it many times over a period of 10 years, including Bill Clinton, and not Bush when he said it
before the vote on the War Resolution.....being wrong is not lying unless you KNOW you're wrong...YOU personally, not someone else.
If you think you are right when you make a claim and you're not right......you're just not right, you're incorrect, you're not accurate, you made a mistake....but
in not way did you lie.....lying is a conscious attempt to deceive......

Its only a three letter word, in any dictionary, ridiculous it has to be explained over and over to you.


Obama knew he was lying. Obama was informed by the CIA and the people on the ground in Lybia, a week before his appearance on Letterman
that the video had nothing to do with the terrorist attack....then he sent Rice out to appear on several tv shows to repeat that lie.....
There is no doubt, Obama is a liar.


again. Bush KNEW of the existence of doubt within his own intelligence establishment. He KNEW there was doubt. To say there IS NO DOUBT when doubt did indeed exist within his own organization and he knew full well of that doubt, is a LIE. A false statement that he knew to be false when he made it. If he had said, I HAVE NO DOUBT, or THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT, it wouldn't have been a lie. But he didn't. He lied. He claimed absolute certainty when he knew that absolute certainty did not exist. liar. but, as we have shown over and over again, you could care less, because the taste of Bush's anal ring is so intoxicating to you, you can't think straight after a good hearty lick.
 
again. Bush KNEW of the existence of doubt within his own intelligence establishment. He KNEW there was doubt. To say there IS NO DOUBT when doubt did indeed exist within his own organization and he knew full well of that doubt, is a LIE. A false statement that he knew to be false when he made it. If he had said, I HAVE NO DOUBT, or THERE IS LITTLE DOUBT, it wouldn't have been a lie. But he didn't. He lied. He claimed absolute certainty when he knew that absolute certainty did not exist. liar. but, as we have shown over and over again, you could care less, because the taste of Bush's anal ring is so intoxicating to you, you can't think straight after a good hearty lick.

So did all the dems who claimed the same thing lie too?

And please don't use the "they didn't send anyone to war". It only embarrasses you.
 
Okay, so the president said that the terrorists were sparked by a video.

How does that make any difference? Why does that upset you so much? Why does it matter if the terrorists were sparked by a video or not? Did more people die because the president said the terrorist attack was sparked by a video? Was the reaction to the event any better or worse whether terrorists were inspired to act by a video or if they were inspired to act for some other crazy terrorist reason?

I just don't get the controversy.

The fact is that he lied, and did it to preserve his narrative that al queda had been defeated
 
How about on TOP of the lies, that during the raid on osama he was right there in the room with national security team, during the attack on Benghazi he went to bed instead of leading.
 
How about on TOP of the lies, that during the raid on osama he was right there in the room with national security team, during the attack on Benghazi he went to bed instead of leading.

Actually to clarify, nobody really knows where Obama was during that 8 hours. The media has not as of yet asked that question. We will see if they are sufficiently scorned over the AP scandal that they begin to ask tougher questions. Jay Carney has arguably had the worst two weeks of any Press Secretary.

They are used to fawning coverage from the media. They are used to the media running interference for them. The media now realizes that the love they have extolled on this administration has not been reciprocated. What is that saying about a lover scorned?
 
Then why did so many dems claim it to be true pre iraq invasion

some democrats certainly believed that Saddam probably had stockpiles of WMD's, but only one democrat, Al Gore, ever expressed absolute certainty about the existence of stockpiles and he did this long after he had left public office. Team Bush, on the other hand, expressed the LIE of absolute certainty - claiming there was NO DOUBT when they KNEW that doubt existed - on numerous occasions.
 
So did all the dems who claimed the same thing lie too?

And please don't use the "they didn't send anyone to war". It only embarrasses you.

let me use this instead which, while certainly not embarrassing me, makes me proud:

a majority of democrats in congress voted against the use of force resolution, whereas the republicans supported it with near unanimity. that's a fact.
 
some democrats certainly believed that Saddam probably had stockpiles of WMD's, but only one democrat, Al Gore, ever expressed absolute certainty about the existence of stockpiles and he did this long after he had left public office. Team Bush, on the other hand, expressed the LIE of absolute certainty - claiming there was NO DOUBT when they KNEW that doubt existed - on numerous occasions.

He did, and he moved them to Syria we have the satellite images of pre war convoys into syria.
 
He did, and he moved them to Syria we have the satellite images of pre war convoys into syria.

that's what the signals from space tell you? time to put the tinfoil hat back on!

Really.... do the satellites show what was IN those convoys, or is WMD's just your best guess?
 
So did all the dems who claimed the same thing lie too?

And please don't use the "they didn't send anyone to war". It only embarrasses you.

Depends of if they said that there is "no doubt". If they did say that, yes they lied... but they were not "the decider" at the time.
 
Back
Top