Maybe even more coming.....

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
Looks like the rank and file IRS workers ain't gonna fall on their swords for the Messiah.....or anyone else in the food chain.....I can only hope and pray we
see them at the next hearing, under oath, spilling their guts out....

“We’re not political,’’ said one determinations staffer in khakis as he left work late Tuesday afternoon. “We people on the local level are doing what we are supposed to do. . . . That’s why there are so many people here who are flustered. Everything comes from the top. We don’t have any authority to make those decisions without someone signing off on them. There has to be a directive.”
http://tinyurl.com/axlzo7f
 
Its only just begun....


Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

By Jeffrey Lord on 5.20.13 @ 6:11AM

President met with anti-Tea Party IRS union chief the day before agency targeted Tea Party.

“For me, it’s about collaboration.” — National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley on the relationship between the anti-Tea Party IRS union and the Obama White House

March 31, 2010.

According to the White House Visitors Log, provided here in searchable form by U.S. News and World Report, the president of the anti-Tea Party National Treasury Employees Union, Colleen Kelley, visited the White House at 12:30pm that Wednesday noon time of March 31st.

The White House lists the IRS union leader’s visit this way:

Kelley, Colleen Potus 03/31/2010 12:30

In White House language, “POTUS” stands for “President of the United States.”

The very next day after her White House meeting with the President, according to the Treasury Department’s Inspector General’s Report, IRS employees — the same employees who belong to the NTEU — set to work in earnest targeting the Tea Party and conservative groups around America. The IG report wrote it up this way:

April 1-2, 2010: The new Acting Manager, Technical Unit, suggested the need for a Sensitive Case Report on the Tea Party cases. The Determinations Unit Program Manager Agreed.

In short: the very day after the president of the quite publicly anti-Tea Party labor union — the union for IRS employees — met with President Obama, the manager of the IRS “Determinations Unit Program agreed” to open a “Sensitive Case report on the Tea party cases.” As stated by the IG report.

http://tinyurl.com/n4ry3as
 
Its only just begun....


Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

By Jeffrey Lord on 5.20.13 @ 6:11AM

President met with anti-Tea Party IRS union chief the day before agency targeted Tea Party.

“For me, it’s about collaboration.” — National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley on the relationship between the anti-Tea Party IRS union and the Obama White House

March 31, 2010.

According to the White House Visitors Log, provided here in searchable form by U.S. News and World Report, the president of the anti-Tea Party National Treasury Employees Union, Colleen Kelley, visited the White House at 12:30pm that Wednesday noon time of March 31st.

The White House lists the IRS union leader’s visit this way:

Kelley, Colleen Potus 03/31/2010 12:30

In White House language, “POTUS” stands for “President of the United States.”

The very next day after her White House meeting with the President, according to the Treasury Department’s Inspector General’s Report, IRS employees — the same employees who belong to the NTEU — set to work in earnest targeting the Tea Party and conservative groups around America. The IG report wrote it up this way:

April 1-2, 2010: The new Acting Manager, Technical Unit, suggested the need for a Sensitive Case Report on the Tea Party cases. The Determinations Unit Program Manager Agreed.

In short: the very day after the president of the quite publicly anti-Tea Party labor union — the union for IRS employees — met with President Obama, the manager of the IRS “Determinations Unit Program agreed” to open a “Sensitive Case report on the Tea party cases.” As stated by the IG report.

http://tinyurl.com/n4ry3as

Fucking awesome. We got the bastard. Finally.
 
OK, so the article I said was likely from a right wing rag, was from................wait for it................... The American Spectator.
The article you linked from the Washington Post does not even come close to implicating President Obama.

Well, there is more than one issue in the thread, you should have specified what issue you wanted a link to....thats why
I've given you more than one link....
 
... According to the White House Visitors Log ... the president of the anti-Tea Party National Treasury Employees Union, Colleen Kelley, visited the White House at 12:30pm that Wednesday noon time of March 31st.
... The very next day after her White House meeting with the President, according to the Treasury Department’s Inspector General’s Report, IRS employees — the same employees who belong to the NTEU — set to work in earnest targeting the Tea Party and conservative groups around America.

The IG report wrote it up this way:

April 1-2, 2010: The new Acting Manager, Technical Unit, suggested the need for a Sensitive Case Report on the Tea Party cases. The Determinations Unit Program Manager Agreed.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-bl...-union-chief-day-agency-targete#ixzz2Trnw3uVO


So whats your point Jughead.....are you saying this post contains lies because of the source ?
Are you claiming that IG report is a lie...?....

 
So the working theory is that the Preisdent conspired with this person to single out Tea Party groups at the Workplace Flxibilty Forum on March 31, 2010 which was held in a large auditorium at the White House, was attended by over 100 people and which was streamed live on the White House website?

Sherlock Fucking Holmes, you ain't.
 
OK, so the article I said was likely from a right wing rag, was from................wait for it................... The American Spectator.
The article you linked from the Washington Post does not even come close to implicating President Obama.
1. Attack the messenger.
2. Choose the point of view that agrees with yours and ignore the others.
 
1. Attack the messenger.
2. Choose the point of view that agrees with yours and ignore the others.

No, its simply that the American Spectator has been proven time and time again to be loose with the facts in their pursuit of attacking Democrats.
 
By the way, that News Busters write up of the American Spectator thing where a person attended a forum at the White House with 116 other people is the stupidest fucking thing I've read in a while.
 
Back
Top