The Zimmerman Trial

Grind you facist gum barrel fucker!
Your NRAZI poster boy is going to be ankle grabbing in no time!
You piece of shit gun nut
 
The board liberals seem to have forgotten that the prosecution have to PROVE guilt and that all that's needed for a finding of NOT GUILTY is one person with REASONABLE DOUBT.

The standard of proof used in criminal trials to find a defendant guilty of a crime. When a criminal defendant is prosecuted, the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt." A reasonable doubt exists when a juror cannot say with moral certainty that a person is guilty.

AND

If I were he, I would file a suit against Trayvon's parents, seeing as how they can be held liable for his behavior, actions, and damages.

and no matter how much the liberals want to believe otherwise, this case is anything but a slam dunk in terms of conclusive evidence.
 
Oh, you lowlife scum. Trayvon is where he belongs???? Zimmerman hero? Proof positive that racism and bigotry is not only alive and well, but thriving. And when he is convicted, whatever will you do? Gnash your teeth? Repeat zimmy's actions? Hmmmm?


It's no big surprise really...Grind has repeatedly demonstrated a selfish disregard for life if it's not his own.

He cares not one whit for children murdered by criminals with guns.

We've all read his screaming diatribes attacking Trayvon and anyone who DARES to think the lad might be innocent.

And of course we all remember the snide, hurtful comments he directed at a family member suffering mental from mental illness and how, thanks to his self-absorbed lack of concern for anyone other than himself, he couldn't be bothered to even spend a few minutes helping the woman when she sought him out.
 
Travon was most def guilty of walking while being black!
80 of murder trials end in conviction.
Most don't have the confession of the killer.
I'd bet, but klan gun nuts are not trust worthy
 
zappas if you are going to continue to misrepresent something I have clarified for you numerous times, you are going to have a bad time.
 
Travon was most def guilty of walking while being black!
80 of murder trials end in conviction.
Most don't have the confession of the killer.
I'd bet, but klan gun nuts are not trust worthy

this case isn't typical, it's an anomaly. You can't apply standard metrics to it. Regardless of what side one is on.
 
Lets see he followed after being told not to.
He murdered a 14 yr old.
If zim were black and the kid white, you klansman would have lynched him already.
 
Lets see he followed after being told not to.
He murdered a 14 yr old.
If zim were black and the kid white, you klansman would have lynched him already.

trayvon was 17.

this basic fact omission shows how little you've paid attention to this case.

Even if zimmerman did follow travyon (which there is zero evidence for after the dispatcher told him not to), and even though the dispatcher had already been asking him for minutes where trayvon was going - that does not give the right for trayvon to viciously attack him. Following people is not a crime. Beating somebody up for following you is a crime. Trayvon escalated what could have been nothing more than a verbal exchange into a violent conflict. We DO have evidence that zimmerman was badly beaten. At that point zimmerman had every right to but down the violent assaulter trayvon martin.
 
Murders often claim self defense!
A small minority get off.
He might
I hope he gets rape 1,000 times in jail
You fucking facist gun nut
 
Lets see he followed after being told not to.
He murdered a 14 yr old.
If zim were black and the kid white, you klansman would have lynched him already.

And there's the liberal lie, again.

He was never TOLD "not to"; but keep promoting the lie, topspin, because if the prosecution tries the same thing, they will definitely fail.
Just like you.

Plus, you dundering idiot, Trayvon was 17 years old. :palm:
 
trayvon was 17.

this basic fact omission shows how little you've paid attention to this case.

Even if zimmerman did follow travyon (which there is zero evidence for after the dispatcher told him not to), and even though the dispatcher had already been asking him for minutes where trayvon was going - that does not give the right for trayvon to viciously attack him. Following people is not a crime. Beating somebody up for following you is a crime. Trayvon escalated what could have been nothing more than a verbal exchange into a violent conflict. We DO have evidence that zimmerman was badly beaten. At that point zimmerman had every right to but down the violent assaulter trayvon martin.

Are you insane? Back in olden times, it was customary for gentlemen to challenge an adversary to "a duel". If someone is "stalking" you, or appearing threatening, a school of thought would be to strike the first blow, before it's struck on you. Viciously? You are insane. What ultimately happened? Zimmerman, armed with a gun (which is in violation of any "watch") shot and killed Trayvon, an unarmed teenager, who was apparently being threatened by Zimmerman. I guess because Martin was "black", he is prevented from defending himself, and Zimmerman, because he is at least, "half-white (Jewish?) is allowed to use deadly force, because of "white privilege" or "passing for white privilege"? Why should the black kid have to back down, in deference to the adult (who, obviously, was out of control, and overstepping bounds)? And if Zimmerman had been an instructor in a classroom, and done the same thing to a student, we wouldn't even be discussing this, as it would be a "moot point", and Zimmerman would be jailed for life.
You display your racism, insensitivity and lack of morality by your position.
 
It's no big surprise really...Grind has repeatedly demonstrated a selfish disregard for life if it's not his own.

He cares not one whit for children murdered by criminals with guns.

We've all read his screaming diatribes attacking Trayvon and anyone who DARES to think the lad might be innocent.

And of course we all remember the snide, hurtful comments he directed at a family member suffering mental from mental illness and how, thanks to his self-absorbed lack of concern for anyone other than himself, he couldn't be bothered to even spend a few minutes helping the woman when she sought him out.

Absolutely. And whatever gave girlfriend the idea that the photo displayed as her avatar, represents a typical male. The stance of the person in the foto, and the expression, is so "queen-y", that Jiffy Peanut Butter couldn't be 'real-er" than that. She gave herself away with that one.
 
Trayvon is a criminal, I am happy he is dead. It has nothing to do with race. Zimmerman is a hero because he rightfully put down the criminal trayvon martin. If zimmerman is found guilty, I will lament our media propaganda machine that deliberately lied and spliced audio to make zimmerman say something he didn't. I certainly wont riot and break shit of innocent people, like you would.

No. He was a teenager, who was on his cellphone, to his girlfriend, who was simply walking to his father's house, after purchasing an iced tea, and a bag of Skittles. That, strangely enough, is not against the law. Mentally disturbed loser, Zimmerman, a "wanna be policeman" reject...decided to play "cops and robbers", "for real", and wound up killing an innocent youth, because he relied on his racist stereotypes instead of common sense.
I'm confident that Zimmerman will be found guilty and will be put away, where he belongs. I have zero confidence that you will understand justice being served. Your racist and bigoted indoctrination is too "ingrained" to recalibrate your mindset, to the reality. I have no intentions of "rioting" and "breaking up shit", as my hyperbole suggested, should a "not guilty" verdict ensue, but I predict that the backlash will be severe, and heads "will roll", metaphorically, and undoubtedly, "physically", as well.
 
Back
Top