gay ex soldier waitress will donate tips to wounded warriors

the merchant copy is the one that gets billed, so if the merchant copy in the picture is the actual merchant copy, then she did NOT lie.

Yeah... unless of course the merchant copy has been altered... by say a certain waitress... or someone else that works at the restaurant... keep in mind the customer has their credit card bill showing the correct amount was charged... including the tip.
 
Yeah... unless of course the merchant copy has been altered... by say a certain waitress... or someone else that works at the restaurant... keep in mind the customer has their credit card bill showing the correct amount was charged... including the tip.
here's my problem with this. the two receipts are not done by carbon paper, so each receipt is filled out separately. the merchant copy is what is used to finalize the bill, not the customer copy, so the tip on the customer copy means nothing at this point. it is indeed possible that the waitress wrote the sentence on the merchant receipt, but she would have had to white out the tip and that would be visible.

so i'm not convinced of anything at this point.
 
It says "days of gratuities"... Does it mean one day of gratuities or several days, if several how many?
 
Another gay hoax goes down in flames....

After a gay server at a New Jersey restaurant said a customer denied her a tip and wrote her a hateful note on the receipt, a local family contacted NBC 4 New York and said their receipt shows they paid a tip and didn't write any such note.

Dayna Morales, a former Marine and a server at Gallop Asian Bistro in Bridgewater, posted a photo on Facebook earlier this month, showing the bill with a line through the space for a tip. The photo of the receipt showed someone had written, "I'm sorry but I cannot tip because I do not agree with your lifestyle."

Morales indicated in her Facebook post, and in subsequent media interviews -- including with NBC 4 New York -- that the customer wrote that line.

But a family contacted NBC 4 New York claiming their receipt from the restaurant shows they did leave a tip, and provided what they said was a credit card statement as proof.

The husband and wife, who asked to remain anonymous, showed NBC 4 New York a receipt that appeared to be printed at the same minute, on the same date, for the same $93.55 total, except with an $18 tip.

They also provided a document they said was a Visa bill, which appears to indicate their card was charged for the meal plus the tip, for a total of $111.55.


131126-receipt-hmed-tip-850a.photoblog600.jpg


The couple told NBC 4 New York that they believed their receipt was used for a hoax. The wife says she is left-handed and could not have made the slash in the tip line, which she said looks to be drawn from the right.

"We've never not left a tip when someone gave good service, and we would never leave a note like that," the wife said.

The husband said he and his wife have both worked in restaurants and believe in the value of tipping, and noted that he didn't vote for Gov. Chris Christie because the governor doesn't support gay marriage. "Never would a message like that come from us," he said.

Morales told NBC 4 New York on Monday that she was certain she did not receive a tip, and insisted the handwriting on the receipt was not hers. When asked if there had been some sort of misunderstanding, she said, "I don't know, all I know is what I've been saying."

A manager and the restaurant owner insisted they had the original ticket for the $93.55 charge, but would not produce the receipt for NBC 4 New York and could not explain why the family's credit card was charged for more. The restaurant later said in a statement it was aware of the allegations and had no comment pending an internal investigation.

Whatever happened, the couple believes it may have begun with a misunderstanding.

They said they thought the hostess who sat the family told them their server would be "Dan," and when Morales showed up at their table, the wife exclaimed "whoa, you're not Dan." Morales wrote in her Facebook post that the wife said, "oh I thought you were gonna say your name is Dan. You sure surprised us!"

According to the couple, the rest of the meal with their two children went fine.

They said they came forward because the story of the receipt note didn't appear to be going away; Morales had recently announced that people were sending her tips from all over the world, and was donating some of the money to the Wounded Warrior Project.

"I just felt like people have a right to know that -- it's fine of people want to donate to her or to the Wounded Warriors, but they're doing it under a false pretense," the wife said.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/26/21625339-family-disputes-gay-servers-story?lite

:rofl2:

Just as I said, losers are looking for their 15 minutes of fame and some cash.


I am with smarter's camp on this one. In the first place, they signed the copy that said 93.55! That is the Merchant's copy receipt that has the customer's signature on it or at least their initials on it--I think they signed it Berman--it is for 93.55. But if you look at the receipt that they have written the information on, the number next to the highlighted number that is the total there; it is also for 93.55 even though someone (else as SF has noted) apparently wrote the other numbers in the customer copy which is the way it is usually done. When you get the receipt you write the amount you are paying and sign it and leave it in the little thingy--usually a covered folder-- and take the customer copy with you for your records--you take that home. But the one that is signed is how much they paid or were charged and that says $93.55! It appears if there is a hoax here it is the customer's who have added a tip to the customer copy that doesn't appear on the Merchant's copy they signed for 93.55! I can't explain the Visa card bill but we haven't see that so who knows what that actually said or whether they did something to that, but I have to go with the Merchant's copy which has someone's signature on it and it looks like it was sighed by a right handed writer to me. So all the talk about being left handed is disproved by the actual slant of the writing in the signature!
 
also... if you want to look solely at the receipt copies... check the writing... the 5's don't match at all.


What is your point? It's likely that someone else wrote the numbers on the Customer copy when they got home. It was written with a different pen as well as the numbers being different. The ink uses on the two receipts is different also. The pen that wrote the $93.55 on the Merchants copy is also the pen used for the signature which looks like Berman to me, and is written by someone who appears to me to be right handed as well!
 
And you were so right.

I think it is too early to tell that yet! Someone apparently signed a Merchant receipt with the amount of $93.55 written in in the same ink as the signature. And that signature appears to indicate that the signee was right handed.
 
Sometimes retards like me accidentally sign the customer copy and then rewrite our entries in the correct merchant copy.
 
Somebody (really a nobody) is served a meal and because that somebody is a bigot, they stiff the server and decide to leave a note expressing their selfish views. Life is not all about the bigot and hell yes, it should make the news. Let's shine a light on all those bigot rats.

I want evidence of a crime being committed before you and your playmates proceed to ruin two people's lives over an alleged note to a dyke waitress. As far as you're concerned, the two are guilty because the fag dyke said she got the note and no matter how much evidence there is proving that the whole affair was a hoax, it doesn't matter to you and your associates, you want the pair's heads on a platter even though if the allegation was true, it still doesn't amount to a felony.

I'm the only one on this thread who has used common sense by pointing out that no crime was committed because some dyke is playing a victim of homophobia.

Writing a note to somebody telling them they don't like their looks or they have too much makeup on or they don't carry themselves correctly is not a criminal offense.
 
I think it is too early to tell that yet! Someone apparently signed a Merchant receipt with the amount of $93.55 written in in the same ink as the signature. And that signature appears to indicate that the signee was right handed.

Here's another man hating creep, little mizz violence against women pointing out technicalities like the punk tailgater did yesterday.

So what punishment fits the homophobic witch hunt crime here according to little miss violence against women? She's already condemned the two and doesn't give a rat's ass whether the story from the dyke is a hoax or not. She wants their names exposed to the media because they are bigots!

And then they will lose their jobs, their home, their marriage will fall apart and they will be shunned socially from society and ever branded as politically incorrect bigots who committed a hate speech crime against a poor fag dyke waitress.

And you people on the right want to play footsies with vermin like her.
 
here's my problem with this. the two receipts are not done by carbon paper, so each receipt is filled out separately. the merchant copy is what is used to finalize the bill, not the customer copy, so the tip on the customer copy means nothing at this point. it is indeed possible that the waitress wrote the sentence on the merchant receipt, but she would have had to white out the tip and that would be visible.

so i'm not convinced of anything at this point.

I have to agree with you*, the merchant copy's the only one that matters. The picture on the FB page is very clear and doesn't show evidence of tampering.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?....192270474212407.34793.192269477545840&type=1

*Do you need smelling salts?
 
I want evidence of a crime being committed before you and your playmates proceed to ruin two people's lives over an alleged note to a dyke waitress. As far as you're concerned, the two are guilty because the fag dyke said she got the note and no matter how much evidence there is proving that the whole affair was a hoax, it doesn't matter to you and your associates, you want the pair's heads on a platter even though if the allegation was true, it still doesn't amount to a felony.

I'm the only one on this thread who has used common sense by pointing out that no crime was committed because some dyke is playing a victim of homophobia.

Writing a note to somebody telling them they don't like their looks or they have too much makeup on or they don't carry themselves correctly is not a criminal offense.

Nobody said it was a crime, did they?
 
here's my problem with this. the two receipts are not done by carbon paper, so each receipt is filled out separately. the merchant copy is what is used to finalize the bill, not the customer copy, so the tip on the customer copy means nothing at this point. it is indeed possible that the waitress wrote the sentence on the merchant receipt, but she would have had to white out the tip and that would be visible.

so i'm not convinced of anything at this point.

Yet AGAIN... the credit card statement shows that the charge was for the amount of the bill PLUS the tip. So how do you explain the credit card company getting charged EXACTLY for what the customer says they tipped plus the bill?
 
What is your point? It's likely that someone else wrote the numbers on the Customer copy when they got home. It was written with a different pen as well as the numbers being different. The ink uses on the two receipts is different also. The pen that wrote the $93.55 on the Merchants copy is also the pen used for the signature which looks like Berman to me, and is written by someone who appears to me to be right handed as well!

No, it is more likely that someone tried to alter the merchant copy... which coincidentally is the copy that the MERCHANT refuses to release. Yet the customer had no problem doing so. The customer ALSO showed the news station a copy of their credit card bill that was charged for the bill PLUS the tip.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ss-offensive-note-instead-tip-claim-hoax.html

The above link shows the families credit card statement showing they were charged the bill PLUS THE TIP.

So either the waitress is lying or someone she works with altered the merchant copy. Either way... both the waitress and the restaurant owe the customer an apology.

Funny too how the restaurant was more than willing to comment when they were getting business and good publicity from this story, but now they are silent 'pending an internal investigation'.
 
Back
Top