Proof that Righties HATE President Obama

Good to see you can only talk about black people in terms of how they vote. Not a surprise from a racist white woman.
 
evince said:
dude this is a politics site.

fuck you people are dishonest
Click to expand...

And you are a racist white woman. Nothing dishonest about that. You don't give a shit about black people. It's plain as say to see. You couch your racism in voting terms.
 
why did a black republican say that black people think republicans are trying to cheat them out of their vote?
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3413305.html


Steele and Charles Zelden, a professor of history and legal studies who specializes in politics and voting at Nova Southeastern University, said Republicans need to avoid political blunders, like the efforts by Republican-controlled state governments, including Florida to tighten voting rules before the 2012 election. Those moves were widely seen in the African-American community as an effort to disenfranchise voters.

The result, Wright said, was a backlash from black voters who turned out en masse, and voted Democratic, largely to support President Barack Obama's re-election, but also to show they couldn't be stopped from voting.

Steele said Republicans are doomed if they don't find new supporters from a range of demographic groups.

"Not just African-Americans, all voters. How many demographics did we win in 2012? One," he said. Republicans lost the vote of "every class of citizen except old white men. Nothing against old white men, but America's more than that."



he ran your fucking party for hells sake
 
Taft2016 said:
Whether or not the discussion moves forward depends entirely upon you.

All you have to do is acknowledge that Truth Detector was right, and you were wrong when you said "Nobody's talking about chains."

Until you can own up to that self-evident fact, the discussion will remain stalled.
Click to expand...

it would seem that you are a liar.... our discussion was halted entirely by you.

what a douchebag.
 
maineman said:
thank God the constitution is a living breathing document and not one locked into the 18th century...

I bet African Americans are happy about that as well.
Click to expand...
you're mixing two different ideologies with this, though not surprising that you need to resort to obfuscation about it. amending the constitution according to the constitutional steps provided does not make it a living breathing document. allowing 9 black robed tyrants to interpret a constitution according to the 'times' is the same as ignoring the constitution and ignoring your duties and responsibilities of upholding the constitution.
 
maineman said:
it would seem that you are a liar.... our discussion was halted entirely by you.

what a douchebag.
Click to expand...

Not at all, Lord Douchebag.

Our discussion concluded when you admitted you were wrong.

You wanted to continue to discuss one of your irrelevant tangents that had nothing to do with our discussion. I was not interested.

It's funny you consider my on-line courage dependent upon my participation in your irrelevant tangents. I offered up an irrelevant tangent as well; the price of eggs in Guam. That's a discussion I'm willing to participate in, if you have the huevos.

Moron.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you're mixing two different ideologies with this, though not surprising that you need to resort to obfuscation about it. amending the constitution according to the constitutional steps provided does not make it a living breathing document. allowing 9 black robed tyrants to interpret a constitution according to the 'times' is the same as ignoring the constitution and ignoring your duties and responsibilities of upholding the constitution.
Click to expand...
were the justices who decided Plessy v. Ferguson tyrants, or were the ones who decided Brown v. Board of Education? Perhaps neither?
 
Taft2016 said:
Not at all, Lord Douchebag.

Our discussion concluded when you admitted you were wrong.

You wanted to continue to discuss one of your irrelevant tangents that had nothing to do with our discussion. I was not interested.

It's funny you consider my on-line courage dependent upon my participation in your irrelevant tangents. I offered up an irrelevant tangent as well; the price of eggs in Guam. That's a discussion I'm willing to participate in, if you have the huevos.

Moron.
Click to expand...

that is not, however, what you said.... you said continuing the discussion was contingent on me admitting something... I did, and then you ran away like a fucking pussy. Your "on-line courage" is, I am sure, just as big as your real world courage. Nutless gasbag. ::yawn::
 
maineman said:
were the justices who decided Plessy v. Ferguson tyrants, or were the ones who decided Brown v. Board of Education? Perhaps neither?
Click to expand...

They only decide on the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of legislation passed by congress....apples and oranges


At least that is what they are supposed to do.....not redefine the english language as they did in one case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top