budget deal helps economy

the neo cons get credit for swating back the tea tards.

they also get credit for creating their huge level of stupidity to win elections
 
what will you do when you cant claim any credit for the economy starting to steam along?



you will do what you always do......Just lie about reality
 
I don't capture which party raises the economy!
Just so happens the liberal one is much more profitable.
And you get social change
 
evince said:
http://www.northjersey.com/news/Gridlock_in_the_Senate_progress_in_the_House.html
why because the right wing fucks cant drag the economy down by throwing monkey wrenches in the machinery so easily now.

Do you know what this confirms?

that your party actions were to harm the economy on purpose.

party over country just got harder fro your fucks
Click to expand...

This is an idiots claim; how does the Federal budget process, that allows greater borrowing thus increasing the massive amount of debt the American sheeple are burdened with paying back, a "good" thing for the economy?

This is about as dimwitted and stupid as the claims made to spend $850 billion the Government didn't have and didn't fund, arguing that it would create a lot of high paying jobs.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-under-democratic-presidents-is-it-just-luck/




The U.S. economy does better under Democratic presidents — is it just luck?


Posted by Brad Plumer on December 2, 2013 at 9:45 am


Since World War II, there's been a strikingly consistent pattern in American politics: The economy does much better when a Democrat is in the White House.

More specifically, since 1947, the U.S. economy has grown at an average real rate of 4.35 percent under Democratic presidents and just 2.54 percent under Republicans:
 
evince said:
fuck you

you have no proof of your claims TD
Click to expand...

Reality and statistics are my proof dimwit; all you have is hyper partisan rhetoric and fabrications.

But I will wait for you to provide credible evidence supported by facts how this budget deal will affect the economy.
 
hahahahahahahahahah




how can you claim it wont effect the economy?

all the experts are saying it will


your just somefuckingguy on the internets buttslice
 
The Dude said:
Google it, ignorant troll
Click to expand...

I have, you uneducated troll from the gated trailer park, and there's no factual support for such a moronic claim. It's a tired leftist memeintended for gullible uneducated dimwits like you.

Please tell me how the economy was better under Carter. Please tell me how the economy was better under Johnson. Please tell me how the economy is better under Obama.

But I have to remind myself that you're an uneducated dullard who doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're", "to" and "too" or "more on" from "moron".

You really are THAT incredibly stupid and repugnant.
 
Truth Detector said:
I have, you uneducated troll from the gated trailer park, and there's no factual support for such a moronic claim. It's a tired leftist memeintended for gullible uneducated dimwits like you.

Please tell me how the economy was better under Carter. Please tell me how the economy was better under Johnson. Please tell me how the economy is better under Obama.

But I have to remind myself that you're an uneducated dullard who doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're", "to" and "too" or "more on" from "moron".

You really are THAT incredibly stupid and repugnant.
Click to expand...
It's actually near 1 percent per year better
That's thousands more for me
Dipstick
 
evince said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-under-democratic-presidents-is-it-just-luck/

The U.S. economy does better under Democratic presidents — is it just luck?

Posted by Brad Plumer on December 2, 2013 at 9:45 am

Since World War II, there's been a strikingly consistent pattern in American politics: The economy does much better when a Democrat is in the White House.

More specifically, since 1947, the U.S. economy has grown at an average real rate of 4.35 percent under Democratic presidents and just 2.54 percent under Republicans:
Click to expand...

Again you read, but do not comprehend. In your own article it states that the best explanation for this "phenomena" is random economic cycles; nothing more. There is no solid correlation between Presidential policy, other than wars, that explains this other than "timing."

Of course uneducated dimwits like you and The Dud are examples of what happens when dimwits are given data they can't understand or comprehend, they jump to patently stupid conclusions with it.

Yes, you really are THAT stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top