IVAN CHESNOKOV
HERO OF SOCIALIST LABOR
IVAN IS GLAD TO BE OF SEEING AMERICAN POLICE TAKING AFTER SUPERIOR SOVIET RUSSIAN POLICE.
Could Any American Citizen Actually Believe That This "Cop" Was On Their Side?
- Thread starter philly rabbit
- Start date
philly rabbit
Verified User
Senior citizens in neighborhoods deserve neighborhood police protection. Shut ins, people who use walkers, bedridden people, people who couldn't normally defend themselves to any degree when vermin break in to their homes.
Lose the slave loving confederate shit
You fake southerner
philly rabbit
Verified User
You college faggot libertarians out there. The purpose of paying tax dollars for police and fire departments is to expect the police to practice crime prevention in communities by simply being in those communities at the likely time when most crime happens. I don't want to hear anymore of your personal freedom and your college theories of classic liberalism when it comes to neighborhood crime prevention.
I personally don't give a rat's ass if drunks want to kill each other on the highways late at night but I do expect local law enforcement to be local law enforcement and not to be servants of Washington DC lobbies in the name of social justice or some deranged group of anti male fanatics. Right now the police have become nothing else besides an enforcement arm of the central authority and a crime investigation unit for the citizens.
philly rabbit
Verified User
And also please note that my position on my thread is pro family and pro community and pro working man and woman and especially pro taxpayer as most of my positions usually are.
philly rabbit
Verified User
How about getting stuck in a room with a confederate slave lover and a degenerate armed only with a roach clip and the slave lover with a nice size steak knife and the door locked instead? And no phone to call the 911 crime investigation unit.
I saw a slasher movie with this kind of plot the other night on Netflix.
philly rabbit
Verified User
No you're only interested in protecting the rights of the criminal like a good leftist. And don't look down your compulsory educational nose at me, you at least half a fag reject from an occupy wall street unemployed bum extravaganza.
If I'm working nights and I'm not there to do it, I want my local police protecting my wife and young child from vermin stalking my neighborhood at night and you would disarm both while you covet the intruder in my neighborhood with his rights being violated.
Now there's the highway patrol and the state police for the highways and there are the local police for the local communities.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
So; was this your first DUI/DWI or are you facing stiffer penalties for being a repeat offender?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, now I understand.
You got home and found out that you had been burglarized.
Sorry for your losses.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
they've been turned in to an oppressive military force that does nothing but create criminals and collect revenue for the state.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
eternal vigilance. anything else is willful ignorance.
philly rabbit
Verified User
Hey college fag boy, why don't you go screw yourself.
philly rabbit
Verified User
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, now I understand.
You got home and found out that you had been burglarized.
Sorry for your losses.
Hey college fag boy, let me ask you something:
Would you rather have the police extract you from my neighborhood that you have no business being in after 10pm or would you rather we do it?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
hey junior. when the supposed good cops do not stop the bad ones, or worse even protect the bad ones, then their collaboration makes them bad cops.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
How do you know I wouldn't have business in your neighborhood, after 10PM?
Since you said something about working nights, maybe I'm your wife's "backdoor man".
philly rabbit
Verified User
How do you know I wouldn't have business in your neighborhood, after 10PM?
Since you said something about working nights, maybe I'm your wife's "backdoor man".
Listen you little fagg*t, you've done nothing except troll this thread now for three days and you haven't done anything else but. Now take a hike and get lost if this topic doesn't interest you. You're not funny and you're acting like your thumb is stuck in your mouth.
Get lost and stop your damn trolling college boy.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Fuck off, you whiny little biatch.
You started with the insults or did you forget what you posted, in your sorrow.
You'd be the first one to reverse your whiny little cry fest, if some drunk plowed into your families vehicle; because you would then be wanting to know why the cops weren't busy getting the drunks off of the roads, instead of driving through quiet neighborhoods.
You just might have garnered more support, for your plight, if you would have expressed the problem, instead of just going off on a cry fest; unless you were being pulled over and ticketed for a DUI/DWI, as your home was being invaded.
Because in that case; you should have been home with your family, instead of spending your time at the bar drinking.
philly rabbit
Verified User
Fuck off, you whiny little biatch.
You started with the insults or did you forget what you posted, in your sorrow.
You'd be the first one to reverse your whiny little cry fest, if some drunk plowed into your families vehicle; because you would then be wanting to know why the cops weren't busy getting the drunks off of the roads, instead of driving through quiet neighborhoods.
You just might have garnered more support, for your plight, if you would have expressed the problem, instead of just going off on a cry fest; unless you were being pulled over and ticketed for a DUI/DWI, as your home was being invaded.
Because in that case; you should have been home with your family, instead of spending your time at the bar drinking.
Well at least you finally revealed your position.
You're probably a former cop or you know a cop or you have cops in your family.
The police are not above criticism. Especially when they've been directed to chase phantom drunks up and down deserted highways in the middle of the night while the most vulnerable of society like senior citizens are being assaulted in their neighborhood homes. Or perhaps you can justify why this should happen? Maybe you can explain an alternative reason why calling 911 is a futile effort in seeking emergency police help and results in nothing less than calling a police crime investigating unit instead.
It might save more lives by calling 911 if cops were closer to the crime scene such as patrolling those quiet neighborhoods you mentioned where the crime is being committed.
philly rabbit
Verified User
Oh one more thing while I'm on the subject. Did you know that the police have their own "cop bars?" And the cops can go to them and get as loaded as they want then stagger into their own cars but none of them ever get hit with a DUI arrest. Now I wonder why that is?
I wonder if anybody ever got killed by a drunk cop driver? We'll never know.
I wonder if anybody ever got killed by a drunk cop driver? We'll never know.
philly rabbit
Verified User
Police set up roadblocks to 'voluntarily' collect DNA, blood samples from innocent Americans
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040726_DNA_swabs_roadblocks_police_state.html##ixzz2nqXnQnDU
(NaturalNews) When a group of uniformed men wearing guns sets up a road block then ask you to "volunteer" a DNA sample and blood sample, it stretches the definition of "volunteer." But that's what happened in Alabama yesterday as off-duty cops in two counties set up DNA collection roadblocks and stopped cars to ask if drivers wanted to "volunteer" DNA swabs and blood samples.
It was all part of a study being conducted by the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, which is probably studying what percentage of the sheeple population will allow the government to swipe their DNA and archive it in a database for a measly ten bucks.
According to a story published in the Daily Caller, "drivers were asked to voluntarily offer samples of their saliva and blood."
Just one county in Alabama had set up five roadblocks in one day, and more are being rolled out nationwide. The explanation behind all this is that it's for a "medical study" to see how much alcohol drivers have in their blood.
If this is a "medical" study, then why not have scientists in lab coats stopping cars to collect blood?
So here's the real problem with all this: when police carrying guns walk up to your car at a roadblock and ask if you will "volunteer" some samples of your blood and DNA, that's more than a bit coercive. If this is truly supposed to be a scientific study of the blood alcohol levels of anonymous drivers, then why not have scientists in lab coats on the streets collecting the blood?
Answer: Because no one would give it to them. The police are there to make sure the "volunteer requests" are backed up by the implied threat of force. A roadblock staffed by men with guns is going to get a lot more "compliance" than a roadside volunteer booth staffed by a bunch of lab geeks.
And that's why this little police state experiment is a gross abuse of police power and a violation of the civil rights of those targeted in the study. Besides, since when did scientists have to use police to collect data for their studies, anyway?
Faulty data being gathered
If the real purpose of the roadblocks is to collect blood samples for a study documenting alcohol levels of random drivers -- as it claimed by the study organizers -- then they need to go back to school and learn about scientific methods. Because all you're going to get in this study is a self-selected sample of blood and DNA from the most timid, easy-to-dominate sheeple of society... or people who live on such low incomes that $10 seems to be fair compensation for allowing the government to swipe their DNA and archive it in a database.
In other words, you're going to end up studying the blood and DNA of society's total morons and dumbed-down sheeple, many of whom are physiological anomalies to begin with because they all have no spine, no guts and no balls, either.
Thus, the entire stated purpose of the study is hogwash. There is no scientific validity to any data set of human DNA generated from roadblocks staffed by police. The study is invalid at the outset because, by design, it fails to test the blood of those who prefer NOT to interact with police -- i.e. people who have probably been drinking.
This is why I don't believe for a minute that this is some sort of public safety study. It's far more likely to be a police state test run just to see how many idiots in American society will let some government goon swab their DNA when commanded to do so. And that number is shockingly high. We now live in the United States of Apathy, where the sheeple are far more interested in their late-night television, Happy Meals and on-screen celebrities than protecting their rights from an ever-expanding surveillance police state.
Don't you find it amazing, though, to realize all the police state contradictions now in place? Consider:
• At a police DNA swab checkpoint, you're supposed to open your mouth. But at a TSA checkpoint if you open your mouth, you're detained as a possible terrorist.
• At the TSA checkpoint, though, you're supposed to remove your belt and drop your pants. But at a police DNA checkpoint, if you drop your pants, you're arrested for indecent exposure.
• In America, a "terrorist" is a citizen who forgets at which checkpoint he's supposed to drop his pants vs. open his mouth. And if all this talk about pants dropping and mouths opening gets you excited, Janet Napolitano has a job waiting for you at DHS.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040726_DNA_swabs_roadblocks_police_state.html##ixzz2nqXnQnDU
(NaturalNews) When a group of uniformed men wearing guns sets up a road block then ask you to "volunteer" a DNA sample and blood sample, it stretches the definition of "volunteer." But that's what happened in Alabama yesterday as off-duty cops in two counties set up DNA collection roadblocks and stopped cars to ask if drivers wanted to "volunteer" DNA swabs and blood samples.
It was all part of a study being conducted by the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, which is probably studying what percentage of the sheeple population will allow the government to swipe their DNA and archive it in a database for a measly ten bucks.
According to a story published in the Daily Caller, "drivers were asked to voluntarily offer samples of their saliva and blood."
Just one county in Alabama had set up five roadblocks in one day, and more are being rolled out nationwide. The explanation behind all this is that it's for a "medical study" to see how much alcohol drivers have in their blood.
If this is a "medical" study, then why not have scientists in lab coats stopping cars to collect blood?
So here's the real problem with all this: when police carrying guns walk up to your car at a roadblock and ask if you will "volunteer" some samples of your blood and DNA, that's more than a bit coercive. If this is truly supposed to be a scientific study of the blood alcohol levels of anonymous drivers, then why not have scientists in lab coats on the streets collecting the blood?
Answer: Because no one would give it to them. The police are there to make sure the "volunteer requests" are backed up by the implied threat of force. A roadblock staffed by men with guns is going to get a lot more "compliance" than a roadside volunteer booth staffed by a bunch of lab geeks.
And that's why this little police state experiment is a gross abuse of police power and a violation of the civil rights of those targeted in the study. Besides, since when did scientists have to use police to collect data for their studies, anyway?
Faulty data being gathered
If the real purpose of the roadblocks is to collect blood samples for a study documenting alcohol levels of random drivers -- as it claimed by the study organizers -- then they need to go back to school and learn about scientific methods. Because all you're going to get in this study is a self-selected sample of blood and DNA from the most timid, easy-to-dominate sheeple of society... or people who live on such low incomes that $10 seems to be fair compensation for allowing the government to swipe their DNA and archive it in a database.
In other words, you're going to end up studying the blood and DNA of society's total morons and dumbed-down sheeple, many of whom are physiological anomalies to begin with because they all have no spine, no guts and no balls, either.
Thus, the entire stated purpose of the study is hogwash. There is no scientific validity to any data set of human DNA generated from roadblocks staffed by police. The study is invalid at the outset because, by design, it fails to test the blood of those who prefer NOT to interact with police -- i.e. people who have probably been drinking.
This is why I don't believe for a minute that this is some sort of public safety study. It's far more likely to be a police state test run just to see how many idiots in American society will let some government goon swab their DNA when commanded to do so. And that number is shockingly high. We now live in the United States of Apathy, where the sheeple are far more interested in their late-night television, Happy Meals and on-screen celebrities than protecting their rights from an ever-expanding surveillance police state.
Don't you find it amazing, though, to realize all the police state contradictions now in place? Consider:
• At a police DNA swab checkpoint, you're supposed to open your mouth. But at a TSA checkpoint if you open your mouth, you're detained as a possible terrorist.
• At the TSA checkpoint, though, you're supposed to remove your belt and drop your pants. But at a police DNA checkpoint, if you drop your pants, you're arrested for indecent exposure.
• In America, a "terrorist" is a citizen who forgets at which checkpoint he's supposed to drop his pants vs. open his mouth. And if all this talk about pants dropping and mouths opening gets you excited, Janet Napolitano has a job waiting for you at DHS.