What Phil Robertson DID do

actually, it had been established from a moral standpoint for thousands of years......its only been an issue from a legal standpoint since 1972........another word the government decided to redefine and shove down society's throat.......

If you ever bothered to read it, the actual Roe v Wade decision specifically stated that if theologians, philosophers and scientists could not agree when life began, and they presented testimony, the Court itself did not feel confident to decide for others. In other words, American women were free to choose their life for themselves, according to their own personal choices. And the matter gets even more muddy. We all know that when an egg is implanted in the cell wall and then fertilized, it is then expelled at the next period. In other words, God himself aborted these 'lives'. So is a fertilized egg life? It might be, it has the potential to become life, but it is not an individual life. That comes later on in pregnancy.

Conception is an easy place to mark such an event. So is 'birth' which is the standard preferred by those of us who do not want to interfere in the personal lives and problems of women. In some cultures even a baby was not enough, infant mortality was so high that babies weren't named until their first birthday. But the standard is not, and never has been, universal. It is a choice, one people of good conscience should be free to make according to the dictates of their own conscience and beliefs. The desire to take away their right to exercise their own individual decisions is a blow against freedom, and a blow to impose governmental tyranny over universal choice.
 
If you ever bothered to read it, the actual Roe v Wade decision specifically stated that if theologians, philosophers and scientists could not agree when life began, and they presented testimony, the Court itself did not feel confident to decide for others. In other words, American women were free to choose their life for themselves, according to their own personal choices. And the matter gets even more muddy. We all know that when an egg is implanted in the cell wall and then fertilized, it is then expelled at the next period. In other words, God himself aborted these 'lives'. So is a fertilized egg life? It might be, it has the potential to become life, but it is not an individual life. That comes later on in pregnancy.

Conception is an easy place to mark such an event. So is 'birth' which is the standard preferred by those of us who do not want to interfere in the personal lives and problems of women. In some cultures even a baby was not enough, infant mortality was so high that babies weren't named until their first birthday. But the standard is not, and never has been, universal. It is a choice, one people of good conscience should be free to make according to the dictates of their own conscience and beliefs. The desire to take away their right to exercise their own individual decisions is a blow against freedom, and a blow to impose governmental tyranny over universal choice.

When does life begin?
 
and people who had nothing at all to do with religion believed that mosquitoes spontaneously spawned in rain water.....as I say, now we have biology....

by the way, you DO realize Exodus 21 says that if the unborn child dies the person who caused the death was put to death, right?......

you're wrong... the penalty of death is only if the woman dies, not her "fruit".
 
And that is solely the fault of greedy insurance companies for making changes to policies that previously had been acceptable under the ACA.

They KNEW it would cause policies to be rejected that had previously been allowed due to grandfathering.

uh, until Obamacare came along nothing had to be "grandfathered".......the simple fact is that, as you say, they made changes to policies that had previously been acceptable before the ACA went into effect in January, 2014 and were not acceptable as of January, 2014......it isn't greedy insurance companies that made those policies unacceptable, it was the ACA......

and the "they" that knew it would cause policies to be rejected was the Obama administration.....
 
scientists could not agree when life began

every scientist knows when life begins.....if it wasn't alive we wouldn't have to kill it, would we......

In other words, God himself aborted these 'lives'.

gosh I hate that immature and shallow argument......no, you mindless fuck, he did NOT abort those lives.....its a fucking miscarriage.....it no more justifies abortion than arguing that since everyone dies eventually, from old age if nothing else, God murders everyone and we don't need to have laws against homicide.....

So is a fertilized egg life?

yes, in-arguably......science can prove it.....
 
you're wrong... the penalty of death is only if the woman dies, not her "fruit".

bullshit....
NIV Hebrews 21:22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely[e] but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.

if all that happens is that the child is born early he pays a fine......if there is physical injury, he is physically injured......if there is death, he dies.....

baby killers always misrepresent that verse.......
 
bullshit....


if all that happens is that the child is born early he pays a fine......if there is physical injury, he is physically injured......if there is death, he dies.....

baby killers always misrepresent that verse.......

the physical injury is to the mother, not to the child. abortion haters always misrepresent that verse.
 
One very real problem with the whole life begins at conception thing is also that we did not really know about conception and how it medically occcured until we developed. Modern microscopes about 150 years ago. So the idea that morally we have always seen life as starting at conception is pretty much bullshit.
 
One very real problem with the whole life begins at conception thing is also that we did not really know about conception and how it medically occcured until we developed. Modern microscopes about 150 years ago. So the idea that morally we have always seen life as starting at conception is pretty much bullshit.

Do you know when life starts?
 
So you're an abortion lover? Isn't that special. Murdering a defenseless human being. You're very special kind of evil, aren't you.
of all the people on this entire sight, your opinion of me is the ONE that I value the least. go fuck yourself. I am, and have always been , extremely reluctantly pro-choice.
 
of all the people on this entire sight, your opinion of me is the ONE that I value the least. go fuck yourself. I am, and have always been , extremely reluctantly pro-choice.

Then don't call people names. Thanks for the compliment. If you didn't hate me then I'd know I wasn't doing the job.
 
of all the people on this entire sight, your opinion of me is the ONE that I value the least. go fuck yourself. I am, and have always been , extremely reluctantly pro-choice.
. Exactly. What would you do with a 15 year old girl who had been raped by a neighbor? If you say that life begins at conception and that life can be terminated for no reason, you force her to carry the child to term...something I am not wiling to do. And I know a vase just like this...she decided not to abort and is now a 16 year old mother going to high school and doing just fine. But it was her choice.
 
Back
Top