Canceled.2014.2
Canceled
actually, it had been established from a moral standpoint for thousands of years......its only been an issue from a legal standpoint since 1972........another word the government decided to redefine and shove down society's throat.......
If you ever bothered to read it, the actual Roe v Wade decision specifically stated that if theologians, philosophers and scientists could not agree when life began, and they presented testimony, the Court itself did not feel confident to decide for others. In other words, American women were free to choose their life for themselves, according to their own personal choices. And the matter gets even more muddy. We all know that when an egg is implanted in the cell wall and then fertilized, it is then expelled at the next period. In other words, God himself aborted these 'lives'. So is a fertilized egg life? It might be, it has the potential to become life, but it is not an individual life. That comes later on in pregnancy.
Conception is an easy place to mark such an event. So is 'birth' which is the standard preferred by those of us who do not want to interfere in the personal lives and problems of women. In some cultures even a baby was not enough, infant mortality was so high that babies weren't named until their first birthday. But the standard is not, and never has been, universal. It is a choice, one people of good conscience should be free to make according to the dictates of their own conscience and beliefs. The desire to take away their right to exercise their own individual decisions is a blow against freedom, and a blow to impose governmental tyranny over universal choice.