What Phil Robertson DID do

Big Money said:
I'm pretty certain the various colonies frowned on murder...and adultery, fornication, bastardy and "riotous living".

Wouldn't have been a good time to be a "progressive", I'd think.

http://www.history.org/Foundation/journal/spring03/branks.cfm
Click to expand...

but England did not impose the death penalty for abortion after quickening until 1803, prior to that it was a felony but not a capital crime......so he was in fact wrong about the laws in the colonies, even though he gets a point for being right about the laws of the United States of America during the colonial days.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol, I bet you want to meet in a bar to discuss it......
Click to expand...

so... you are saying that the photos of the bar and the parking ticket are proof that I LIED?

Where is your proof that I did not show? Oh I KNOW... it's the word of 007.... who had absolutely NO proof to back up his bullshit.

again... you've got shit... and you're such a partisan ass that you'd believe shit before you'd give a liberal the victory, no matter how small.

you're fucking pathetic.
 
maine man these people have no honor.

never forget that.


trying to get them to admit that court documented evidence that goes right up inot the supreme court last year is impossible.


They will never never never never never never never never ......yes NEVER be able to deal in truths


ITS BEYOND THEM


They are fucked in the head
 
1966stang said:
One very real problem with the whole life begins at conception thing is also that we did not really know about conception and how it medically occcured until we developed. Modern microscopes about 150 years ago. So the idea that morally we have always seen life as starting at conception is pretty much bullshit.
Click to expand...

So you think people didn't know how pregnancy occurred prior to 150 years ago?

While they may not have been able to see the phenomenon and not have the tech to pinpoint it early in life, that doesn't change the fact that as soon as they realized the woman was pregnant, it was that she was pregnant with CHILD. No one ever said, 'pregnant with FETUS'. No one ever pretended the child wasn't a real 'person'.

Life begins at conception. That is a scientific FACT. Pretending otherwise is simply absurd. IF the fertilized egg attaches, then it will continue to grow and develop. If not, it dies and is expelled from the body naturally. Again... FACT. Obviously miscarriages occur (natural death) as do still borns (some times natural, sometimes accidental), but at no point is it not a child/progeny. At no time is it anything other than human. As long as it is alive and human, you are trying to find a way to justify taking that life if you believe in abortion.

I am of the opinion that the child deserves basic human rights protections, the first and most important right being that of life. Thus, the only reason the mother should be able to 'choose' to kill the child is if it was a life vs. a life, where only one of the two could survive. Every other instance, with the exception of rape, is that of convenience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top