A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

Truth Detector said:
Stevens was sent there; he wasn't there because he wanted to be there. He was sent there on a mission. That mission is still being kept from us and was redacted in his diary posts.

The mission was kept open because Hillary and Obama IGNORED all the warnings that such an event would occur. THEY put Stevens and others at risk and to compound their incompetence, they denied all requests for additional security.

All of our allies had pulled their missions knowing the risk to personnel and KNOWING they could not protect them. This left our mission the ONLY target.

After the events that were predicted in advance which would diminish your moronic hindsight claim, occurred, this administration attempted to LIE about the events and obfuscate Obamas dereliction of duty to respond in a timely fashion and take responsibility. Know one to this day knows where the Commander and Cheif was and who was authorized to command the stand down order to our rescue forces.

Now you can deflect, obfuscate, lie and deny the facts in a desperate effort to re-write the facts, but it doesn't make your dishonest attempts look any less stupid.

If Obama and Hillary are blameless, why fabricate a story? Only clueless hyper partisan dunces like you are not curious.

Meanwhile, this administration uses dunces in the public like you, and the complicit media, to assist in his obfuscations and efforts to prevent all the facts from coming to light. Even Steven's damning testimony has been ignored and not even included in the white washed report attempting to absolve everyone from blame.

We do know this; over time, the truth will be brought to light and then we will learn why this administration, that claims to be the most transparent in the history of mankind, refuses to be honest with the American people. But gullible sheeple like you will continue swilling their special brand of stupid kool aid and bleating their talking points.
Click to expand...

Stevens chose to go to Benghazi. those are the facts.
 
maineman said:
why didn't Hillary respond to EVERY Ambassador's requests for additional resources?

duh
Click to expand...

Once again you illustrate your dishonest ignorance pretending that Hillary must have been swamped with additional security requests throughout the world and couldn't have possibly foreseen the dangerous risks she was placing her personel in Benghazi in; dunce.

Or the equally stupid claim that she was confronted with so many budget constraints that even had she wanted to, could not possibly afford to take the numerous requests coming out of Benghazi for protection.

It doesn't occur to you clueless dunces that Obama and Hillary might had their eyes off the ball and were more concerned with winning an election than worrying about a minor mission in Benghazi.

Morons.
 
Truth Detector said:
Once again you illustrate your dishonest ignorance pretending that Hillary must have been swamped with additional security requests throughout the world and couldn't have possibly foreseen the dangerous risks she was placing her personel in Benghazi in; dunce.

Or the equally stupid claim that she was confronted with so many budget constraints that even had she wanted to, could not possibly afford to take the numerous requests coming out of Benghazi for protection.

It doesn't occur to you clueless dunces that Obama and Hillary might had their eyes off the ball and were more concerned with winning an election than worrying about a minor mission in Benghazi.

Morons.
Click to expand...

can you disprove my suggestions? of course you can't
 
Ishmael Pequod said:
The poor guy was doing his job and you blame him for getting killed. What a disgusting filthy piece of trash.
Click to expand...

The ME is a dangerous place! Libya is not a stable area. Those are the facts. Being an ambassador is risky in any country because you rely on the host country to protect you for the most part, only a limited number of US forces are allowed at our embassies.
 
maineman said:
requests outnumbered resources, perhaps? they usually do. I know for a fact that, during the Reagan presidency, the naval attache at the US embassy in Beirut asked for more security at that installation.... and his request was denied. We all know - well most of us, anyhow - what happened to the embassy in Beirut. Somehow... democrats were able to remember that we supposedly leave partisanship at the water's edge and none of them bitched about Reagan's incompetence in failing to protect the US Embassy in Lebanon....
Click to expand...

So now after all your dishonest deflections and revisionism you now bring up Lebanon?

Please tell me how Lebanon is remotely similar; I'm all eyes dunce.
 
For the 4th time...there is no getting around the fact that Stevens was warned about Benghazi



  • Security officials in Libya had been warning of an al-Qaida attack on U.S. interests in Benghazi for at least three months before that night. Al-Qaida had made its intentions known, via an online posting, to attack the Red Cross, the British and then the Americans. Having already carried out the first two, said Lt. Col. Andy Wood, a Green Berets commander, "it was a matter of time until they captured the third one." Wood told CBS News' Lara Logan that he had been issuing a warning to Americans in Libya, including Stevens, for months: "Leave Benghazi, or you will be killed." He included such warnings, he said, in reports to the Defense and State departments.
 
maineman said:
Stevens chose to go to Benghazi. those are the facts.
Click to expand...

Stevens didn't "choose" to go to Benghazi, for reasons you cannot enunciate, any more than he "chose" to be Ambassador you ignorant dunce.

He was "sent" there for a purpose on State Department business. But then, what difference does it make other than attempt to "imply" he was at fault for his own death?
 
An embassy in a war torn city... in Beirut's case, the attache formally requesting additional security... the state department turning him down... terrorists subsequently attacking the embassy... US lives lost....

not exactly remote in its similarity.
 
Truth Detector said:
Stevens didn't "choose" to go to Benghazi, for reasons you cannot enunciate, any more than he "chose" to be Ambassador you ignorant dunce.

He was "sent" there for a purpose on State Department business. But then, what difference does it make other than attempt to "imply" he was at fault for his own death?
Click to expand...

you don't think that he chose to be the Ambassador to Libya? really? He was sent against his will? wow.

and the state department says that he informed them of his trip to Benghazi, not the other way around.
 
Rana said:
The ME is a dangerous place! Libya is not a stable area. Those are the facts. Being an ambassador is risky in any country because you rely on the host country to protect you for the most part, only a limited number of US forces are allowed at our embassies.
Click to expand...

In this case, the host country clearly stated that they could not ensure our personnel safety and that it was a dangerous and deteriorating situation. Stevens informed his superiors as well and made numerous requests for additional security.

This is why ALL of our allies already pulled their missions. Why do you think Obama and Hillary ignored those warnings and placed our personnel at greater risk and then subsequently LIED about the events during an election?
 
Truth Detector said:
Stevens didn't "choose" to go to Benghazi, for reasons you cannot enunciate, any more than he "chose" to be Ambassador you ignorant dunce.

He was "sent" there for a purpose on State Department business. But then, what difference does it make other than attempt to "imply" he was at fault for his own death?
Click to expand...

He didn't choose to be an Ambassador? OMG you've sunk to the lowest-possible level of idiocy here.

Was he roped and tied and made ambassador against his free will?

You are just so repugnantly stupid it makes my eyes water.
 
Althea said:
For the 4th time...there is no getting around the fact that Stevens was warned about Benghazi
Click to expand...

So it was his fault?

If they knew all this before Stevens went to Benghazi, of his own volition and not under orders of course, why the fake story about a video and spontaneuos protest for two weeks after the fact?

Only a hyper partisan dunce is incapable of putting together two plus two and comprehend the OBVIOUS.
 
christiefan915 said:
He didn't choose to be an Ambassador? OMG you've sunk to the lowest-possible level of idiocy here.

Was he roped and tied and made ambassador against his free will?

You are just so repugnantly stupid it makes my eyes water.
Click to expand...

I seem to recall news stories of him being dragged away from his stateside home in handcuffs and spirited off to Libya.... don't you remember that?
 
maineman said:
An embassy in a war torn city... in Beirut's case, the attache formally requesting additional security... the state department turning him down... terrorists subsequently attacking the embassy... US lives lost....

not exactly remote in its similarity.
Click to expand...

Wrong again dunce; the bombing in Lebanon was on a Marine barracks near the airport who were there as a part of a UN peacekeeping force. They also attacked and killed a significant French force stationed nearby.

No one was asking for additional security in that case and the Marines were a peacekeeping force not a diplomatic mission.

Once again you illustrate what a poorly informed hyper partisan dunce you are. Thank you again for removing any doubt.
 
christiefan915 said:
He didn't choose to be an Ambassador? OMG you've sunk to the lowest-possible level of idiocy here.

Was he roped and tied and made ambassador against his free will?

You are just so repugnantly stupid it makes my eyes water.
Click to expand...

How does once "choose" to be an Ambassador? I'm pretty certain they are "appointed".

Dunce.

And he didn't "choose" to just randomly show up in Benghazi; he was SENT there as part of a mission. A mission this repugnant and lying Administration still will not say what it was.

But alas, I am talking to on ignorant dunce who thinks Ambassadors choose themselves and are not appointed by the President and select their own missions.

Moron.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top