A Deadly Mix in Benghazi
- Thread starter christiefan915
- Start date
There he goes again, dishonest deflections and off topic buffoonery is all the dunces have left to defend their dishonest politicians.
It's simple actually, they think it is all about winning. They have no principles or morals. They arrogantly presume that they are the smartest people on the planet and are entitled to be the "deciders" based on the corrupt and dishonest claim to care more than anyone else.
So buck up you rednecks and just bow to the dictators of what is good and right and pray to their Liberal God of Big Government benevolence. Hail Obummer! Hail Hillary; saviors of the world and benevolent deciders for wealth redistribution schemes.
Yes.
Do you think that the Secretary of State is not responsible for what happens in our embassies and foreign missions? Yes or no?
Do you think that Hillary AND Obama did not ignore the massive evidence being accumulated regarding the dangers and knew that our allies had pulled their missions because they could not protect them while in campaign mode? Yes or no?
Do you think that Hillary and Obama were not aware of the false dialogue on Sunday talk shows by the UN Ambassador? yes or no?
Now try to answer them again honestly.
Now try to imagine what purpose Obama could possibly have by then appointing the person who was sent out to lie to the American people, National Security Advisor.
I'm fairly certain that you have no concept whatsoever, about what honesty means.
You can't find it on your own without someone holding your hand? I'll give you a day.
maineman
Banned
I understand that you're a partisan hack who really only excels at insulting others. honestly.
I am a very honest man. I went to a school that demanded honesty and I took that honor concept to heart and it has guided me for over 40 years. you are a punk ass internet wise guy who thinks that insulting people equates to having a discussion with them.
I am a very honest man. I went to a school that demanded honesty and I took that honor concept to heart and it has guided me for over 40 years. you are a punk ass internet wise guy who thinks that insulting people equates to having a discussion with them.
maineman
Banned
you are claiming that Hillary was aware of Stevens' requests for additional security and summarily denied them. If that is your claim, either prove it or retract it. simple as that.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
I don't use murdered children to shield a corrupt piece of trash politician. That makes you about as relevant as a dead rat at the city dump.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Yeah, that's why you bring up murdered children to deflect from your hero politicians you have sold your soul for. You're a fake.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
the chronology of the thread shows that all the liberal idiots came back the same week........
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
You're the one who brought up Sandy Hook. You also brought up Reagan and Lebanon. You're a coward because you hold no one responsible.
maineman
Banned
I brought up Sandy Hook in relation to Benghazi? can you link me to that post... I don't remember that, or the context of my remarks, if that is true.
And I didn't bring up Reagan, per se... only the embassy in Beirut, which was attacked after requests had been made to beef up security there. I doubt that Reagan OR Shultz had anything directly to say in regards to that request, however... much like I don't believe that Obama or Clinton had anything directly to say regarding the Benghazi request. And what does my unwillingness to throw Hillary under the bus for something she, most likely, had no real input on have to do with me, somehow, being labeled a "coward"? piss brain?
And I didn't bring up Reagan, per se... only the embassy in Beirut, which was attacked after requests had been made to beef up security there. I doubt that Reagan OR Shultz had anything directly to say in regards to that request, however... much like I don't believe that Obama or Clinton had anything directly to say regarding the Benghazi request. And what does my unwillingness to throw Hillary under the bus for something she, most likely, had no real input on have to do with me, somehow, being labeled a "coward"? piss brain?
The security of our embassy's are the DIRECT responsibility of the State Dept....Hillary is the head of that State Dept....
If not her.....WHO?
Where the fuck does the 'buck stop' in this administration....the lowest aide...the file clerk...or is it still at GW's desk ?
maineman
Banned
when looking for criminal negligence, which is what the righties here want to hang around Hillary's neck... you would need to have evidence that she willfully and personally denied the Ambassador's request, and that there were no extenuating circumstances such as other requests from other missions that she legitimately believed were of a higher priority. You all can do neither. It was tragic, and, in hindsight, perhaps even avoidable, but it was not negligent. Shit happens in the world... especially in that part of the world, and everyone who goes to serve our nation in that part of the world understands the risks they are taking, or they certainly OUGHT to. I know that I did.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
She's a liar and so are you. How in the hell do you look in the mirror each morning.
