Dunn trial begins in Florida

Truth Detector said:
Wrong dishonest dunce; you stated them in a biased way. Of course, you're either too stupid, or dishonest, to admit as much.

Now why are you trying to argue with me? You asked for my views, and I stated I would wait for the jury's decision. Then you asked my opinion, now you want to argue with me over that opinion; to what purpose? To remove all doubt bat a dishonest dunce you are?
Click to expand...

Your opinion is now clear. . . Law biding Citizens have a right to kill 17 year old "black" youths if they threaten them.

What was biased in the way I typed the things I typed?
 
Jarod said:
Your opinion is now clear. . . Law biding Citizens have a right to kill 17 year old "black" youths if they threaten them.
Click to expand...

Wrong again counselor; but at least now we see through your transparent efforts to elicit opinions. It was an obvious effort to slander my character and label me as a racist.

Amusing how you do not have the sme level of concern when black youths murder a white wheelchair bound veteran or murder a white jogger because they were bored.

I cannot say I am surprised by your dishonest and laughably stupid tactics.

Jarod said:
What was biased in the way I typed the things I typed?
Click to expand...

I suggest you read the transcript of the testimony in context and then compare it to your simplified version to comprehend what your bias is. I'm not interested in your weak dishonest efforts to engage in a circle of stupidity.

If you find comfort wallowing in stupidity and willful ignorance, who am I to say you cannot.
 
Truth Detector said:
So verbal threats are not considered a form of violence counselor?



I don't recall this being a case about you or your opinions counselor.

DUH
Click to expand...
No, that's not violence... not to me, it might be a threat to commit violence, but that's not the same thing as violence.
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong again counselor; but at least now we see through your transparent efforts to elicit opinions. It was an obvious effort to slander my character and label me as a racist.

Amusing how you do not have the sme level of concern when black youths murder a white wheelchair bound veteran or murder a white jogger because they were bored.

I cannot say I am surprised by your dishonest and laughably stupid tactics.



I suggest you read the transcript of the testimony in context and then compare it to your simplified version to comprehend what your bias is. I'm not interested in your weak dishonest efforts to engage in a circle of stupidity.

If you find comfort wallowing in stupidity and willful ignorance, who am I to say you cannot.
Click to expand...

You are the one who intrajected race into this discussion, I never mentioned anyone's color, until after you did, why was it relevant to you to interject the victims color here?.

So you are going to make allegations of bias, but not be willing to back them up. Gotcha
 
Jarod said:
No, that's not violence... not to me, it might be a threat to commit violence, but that's not the same thing as violence.
Click to expand...

Brandenburg and Watts would tend to disagree with you. Perhaps you need to refresh your legal understanding of the law Counselor? No wonder no one hires you or you're a politician; you're painfully stupid.
 
Jarod said:
You are the one who intrajected race into this discussion, I never mentioned anyone's color, until after you did, why was it relevant to you to interject the victims color here?.

So you are going to make allegations of bias, but not be willing to back them up. Gotcha
Click to expand...

I am amused that now you wish to pretend that race has no bearing in this case.

I don't need to back up the obvious counselor.

Now run along and pretend you know something about the law, debate and honesty.
 
Truth Detector said:
I have never been a fan of prosecuting the fate and guilt of someone before they have had a trial by their peers....
Click to expand...

So you SAY...

...and yet

Truth Detector said:
...yet we don't hear one word about the trial for some black thugs who murdered a wheelchair bound veteran over a few bucks. Or the case of some black thugs who shot a white jogger just for kicks? .
Click to expand...

There you are presuming guilt.

PRESUMING GUILT for TWO different sets of defendants.

Nice to see the Tightie Rightie double standard is alive and well and living in Defective Truth.
 
Truth Detector said:
My opinion is that we have a case of two parties willing to engage in violence because a group of young blacks think they have the right to blare their music so loud that it is disturbing to all around them and a white dude who felt he had a right to ask them to turn their music down and wasn't going to be intimidated or back down.

It is a sad case of the sad state we have evolved where one group feels it is entitled to do whatever they feel like even if it disturbs those around them and can intimidate them through threats of violence and a leftist ideology that says such behavior has to be tolerated even to societal detriment.

Think I am not making sense? Just look at Detroit. We have a societal choice; we can shrink and run. Or we can say enough is enough and raise our kids to respect others, our laws and decency.
Click to expand...


So your opinion boils down to believing White Folk have the right to shoot black people if they won't accede to the demands of the angry white guy?

Of course you do!
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong again shit-for-brains; I am saying that your version of the events are colored by your glaring liberal ignorance and I am not buying into any version painted by a leftist media engaging in malfeasance and misinformation for partisan political purposes.

But you're an incredibly dense dunce and I may have to repeat this a thousand times before it sinks into that thick myopic partisan skull of yours.
Click to expand...


Well then, kindly tell everyone what part of Jarod's version was wrong in your opinion?

Clear it up for everyone please.
 
Truth Detector said:
I am amused that now you wish to pretend that race has no bearing in this case.

I don't need to back up the obvious counselor.

Now run along and pretend you know something about the law, debate and honesty.
Click to expand...


So... First I was playing the race card.

Then.. once I pointed out that you were the one to bring up the color of the victim I'm the idiot for not seeing that race is a factor here.

You are so transparent.

Personally, I do not think race has any bearing on this issue, the color of the parties is not relevant in my assessment of this case. Is it relevant in your assessment? Would you feel differently if the victim had been white and listening to classical music instead of "thug music"?
 
Jarod said:
That makes it okay to kill the "black" kids?
Click to expand...


Note how, just a few posts ago, Defective was going on about being better than "leftist dunces" and waiting for the jury to do it's part and determine guilt.

Except now it's CLEAR that Defective Truth HAS made up his mind about the defendant's guilt, even though he doesn't have all the facts and evidence he was wailing about a while ago.
 
Truth Detector said:
It is colored by YOUR liberal bias and YOUR version of the events which is not how it has been presented in court by the defense. Do you find it odd that you only argue the prosecutors point of view with zero objectivity?

But it has been amusing seeing you once again cajole someone for their opinion then spend an inordinate amount of effort and time attacking that opinion in an effort to accomplish what counselor?
Click to expand...


Not nearly as amusing as watching you blather on for pages about "waiting for the jury to decide guilt or innocence", and then watching you claim anyone who dares side with the prosecution in this case is OBVIOUSLY blinded by partisan bias.

Good ol Two-Faced Defective Truth.
 
Truth Detector said:
So if I tell a woman I am going to rape and beat her; that, in your view, is not violence or threatening?
Click to expand...

Non-sequiter...has NOTHING to do with this case and you're just trying to divert the discussion.

Truth Detector said:
If a group of young black teens approach you in a threatening manner after you ask them to stop doing something, that is not threatening?
Click to expand...

Except it WASN'T A GROUP...it was ONE LONE YOUTH.

You can't even get the most basic of facts straight, yet you rail at Jarod for his Bias.

Truth Detector said:
You have a laughably stupid interpretation of the law. Of course, you also believe that law abiding citizens don't have the right to defend themselves and should shrink and cower in the face of such threats.
Click to expand...

Yeah...the "threat" of loud music.

The defendant was just another coward whose gun made him brave.

Truth Detector said:
Like I said; I am perfectly happy waiting for the juries decision and will accept it as justice. I don't know why you find that so terribly difficult to do.
Click to expand...

Except you're not. You CLEARLY feel the defendant is innocent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top