Dems to lose Senate.

I haven't been following the conversation but if you asked me about a doctor the GOP is pushing my first thought would have been Ben Carson. Maybe it's just me but I don't really think of Rand Paul as a doctor.

BINGO! But I am an idiot because I could not divine who she was erupting about. ;)
 
Excellent points. The whole "deference" and "controlling his wife" business galls me to this day. Also how people bashed Hil for her cookie-baking comment. Now I do believe she made some gaffes and misread how some people would take her remarks. But they blew it all out of proportion.

Looking back we can see it was a lot of sexism against her. Many of us saw it for what it was back then, but few would admit to the positions they took against her in todays environment. We really have come a long way.

There are many issues today, that we will look back at in 20 years and see how backwards we were. I hope I was the one ahead of his time, like I was regarding the sexism issue.
 
I prefer a president who studied the Constitution, Government, and History to someone who studied medicine.

Yet you voted for a man who uses the Constitution for toilet paper and thinks he can bypass Congressional legislation. Ironic isn't it?
 
Once again we see the phony Counselor prone to uttering outright lies in defense of his buffoonery. Read, become better informed and stop your lying:

Bush: The Constitution a ‘Goddamned Piece of Paper’?
Posted on December 12, 2007 | Updated on Feb. 21, 2011

Q: Did President Bush call the Constitution a "goddamned piece of paper"?

A: Extremely unlikely. The Web site that reported those words has a history of quoting phony sources and retracting bogus stories.

FULL QUESTION

Is it true that President Bush called the Constitution a "goddamned piece of paper?" He has never denied it, and it appears that there were several witnesses.

FULL ANSWER

The report that Bush "screamed" those words at Republican congressional leaders in November 2005 is unsubstantiated, to put it charitably.

We judge that the odds that the report is accurate hover near zero. It comes from Capitol Hill Blue, a Web site that has a history of relying on phony sources, retracting stories and apologizing to its readers.

Update, Feb. 21, 2011: The author of the Capitol Hill Blue story has now withdrawn it. Doug Thompson messaged us to say:

Doug Thompson: This is to let you know that the piece on Bush and the Constitution has been changed and reads:

"This article was based on sources that we thought, at the time, were reliable. We have since discovered reasons to doubt their veracity. For that reason, this article has been removed from our database."

I no longer stand behind that article or its conclusions and have said so in answers to several recent queries. In addition, I have asked that it be removed from a documentary film.

Thompson elaborated on what led him to retract his story in an item posted on his website Jan. 1, 2011. He also noted that an earlier article, in which he had referred to Bush as a "madman," has been removed from the site entirely.

The Quote

The report was posted on Dec. 5, 2005. According to author, Doug Thompson, unnamed Republican leaders complained to Bush during a White House meeting about "onerous" portions of the USA Patriot Act, prompting the following:

Capitol Hill Blue: “I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

The Evidence

There’s no record of Bush ever using these words in public and no other news organization has reported him using them privately. Thompson based his report on three sources whom he didn’t name. He gave the date of the quote as "last month," which would put it sometime in November 2005.

Thompson told us he once removed the story from his Web site when others raised doubts and no other news organization came up with a similar story. But he said he later reinstated it and currently believes it to be true. "I wrote the story and I stand by it," Thompson said in a telephone interview.

Thompson told us he based the story on e-mail messages from three persons he knows, all of whom claim to have been present at a White House meeting and to have heard Bush make the statement. He said he finds their account credible: "Sometimes I just have to go with my gut, and my gut tells me he did say this."


http://www.factcheck.org/2007/12/bush-the-constitution-a-goddamned-piece-of-paper/

So please Counselor; stop the lies and dishonest strawmen.
 
You think? Let's ask the Counselor (assuming he gives honest answers); Hey Jarod, is your wife a paralegal???

It's his personal info and nobody's business. I used it as an example of why a wife would help her lawyer husband with briefs, court appearances etc.

Is there any reason why Hillary (a lawyer) shouldn't have helped her husband (also a lawyer) with his job?
 
FACT: GW Bush disobeyed a direct order from his TANG superior officer to report for his annual flight physical. As a result of not taking the physical, he was removed from flight status. Oddly enough, any documentation regarding any disciplinary action taken against him for disobeying that order has been strangely lost in the National Guard archives.

I don't know how they do things in Texas, but I do know that, throughout my service, if I had ever disobeyed a direct order from my superior officer, there would be a record of that in my service record and my career would have been over as of that moment.

OR

Maybe there was no "disciplinary action" taken; because after further review there was no need for it, ergo: there never was any documentation lost in the first place.
 
THEY did?

PROVE it or retract it.

PROVE that Obama got the majority of democratic women primary voters.

I'll wait.

Prove that any documentation, regarding this supposed disciplinary action taken against Bush, was lost.
PROVE IT OR RETRACT IT.
PROVE IT OR ADMIT THAT YOU'RE A LIAR.
I'll wait. :)
 
I don't think that either is the case. I do think that she is the odds on favorite to win the democratic nomination, and I also happen to believe that, with the ascendancy of the tea bagger movement in the GOP, their primary process will force the successful candidate to run much further to the right than they would otherwise need to or want to and will hamper their ability to shake the etch-a-sketch and instantaneously reposition themselves closer to the middle where all the votes are.

But then; you also believe that women will vote for Hillary, because she has a vagina and no other reason. :palm:

it could have happened in '08 if Barack Obama had had a vagina and not a penis.

the point is: women in America have NEVER had the opportunity to vote for a woman for president. They've had 24 trips to the voting booth and, if Hillary is nominated by the democrats, this will be the FIRST time they could actually vote for one of their own as the candidate of a major political party.
 
President Clinton will be more conservative than President Obama has been. That's clear, she has always been more conservative than him. That is why I supported him over her in the last primary. That is why I would prefer a different nominee, she is very middle of the road.

No she won't. She's just as much, if not more than a radical leftist cunt, pure and simple.
 
Guess what... Bush is not running. Hillary is. While I agree it won't be a big issue in 2016, you are quite retarded to pretend that people won't care simply because 'more died under Bush'. More died under Johnson than anyone. OMG OMG OMG OMG...
You should be called Super Derp. The FACT that more State Department Consolate workers died under Bush than Obama wasn't meant as evidence that people should vote for Hilliary but was meant as evidence that GOP blowing hot air about Benghazi is partizan hackery....but if you weren't a Derp you wouldn't have known that, wouldn't you?

Had any pudding lately? :)
 
I don't think that either is the case. I do think that she is the odds on favorite to win the democratic nomination, and I also happen to believe that, with the ascendancy of the tea bagger movement in the GOP, their primary process will force the successful candidate to run much further to the right than they would otherwise need to or want to and will hamper their ability to shake the etch-a-sketch and instantaneously reposition themselves closer to the middle where all the votes are.
If your prediction comes true and the presumptive GOP nominee has to run to the far right to win the GOP nomination than I would agree with you. That may not happen though.
 
Either you’re a bad liar or have been living in a cave. Ben Carson made HUGE news when he presented the keynote address at the 61st Annual National Prayer Breakfast. It was on every news outlet; hard to have missed it. Not long after that he became the darling of the Republican Party and subject to much speculation by the leftist media whether he would be a Republican Candidate for President.

I think you must be lying and do not live in a cave.


I think you're clueless about how little I care about obscure repubs and what they have to say. And your link refers to what happened over a year ago.
 
Back
Top