Great piece in the NY Times...

Yes it does. 60 minutes interviewed Brad Katsuyama last night. It was indeed an eye opener.

Just glad there was someone smart enough, with enough integrity and the desire to put a team together to help solve this problem. Been bitching about the high frequency systems for years. Some of the other stuff I didn't know about. I thought the assholes HAD to put our trades through to the IEX exchange when we told them to do so. Our compliance department is now looking into how they can ignore our input like that.
 
I've been saying for years that this market is grossly overvalued.

Individual trading is way off and investor confidence is low. The DOW keeps rising on computers trading paper back-and-forth. Incessant paper swaps.

The end is drawing near.
 
I've been saying for years that this market is grossly overvalued.

Individual trading is way off and investor confidence is low. The DOW keeps rising on computers trading paper back-and-forth. Incessant paper swaps.

The end is drawing near.

Individual trading as a percentage of overall trades are down, but that has more to do with the increase in high frequency trading. The market is hardly over valued here. No algorithm would be created to bid stocks ever higher with no end or fundamental backing. You would tend to get hammered as another system will short the crap out of your position if you do. Keep in mind, they can make money on the way up or the way down. They have no incentive to price the market too high or too low. They do have an incentive to create volatility.
 
I've been saying for years that this market is grossly overvalued.

Individual trading is way off and investor confidence is low. The DOW keeps rising on computers trading paper back-and-forth. Incessant paper swaps.

The end is drawing near.

Total over reaction, political hackishness makes people keep working
 
That I find hard to believe, there are many easier ways to route traffic to introduce a propagation delay of a few milliseconds.
I don't think you understand Tom. They set up their own exchange and then used this 60km coil of fiberoptics to level the playing field so that no one can take advantage of a time gap on their exchange.
 
I don't think you understand Tom. They set up their own exchange and then used this 60km coil of fiberoptics to level the playing field so that no one can take advantage of a time gap on their exchange.

Mott, are you aware of a concept called deep packet scanning? We used it at T-Mobile to distinguish between Skype and non-Skype traffic for the purposes of billing. Cisco SCE 8000 boxes are ideal for that purpose.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/produc...8000-series-service-control-engine/index.html
 
Back
Top