Republican Derp

How will Hillary be charged with lying to Congress if in her mind she believes what she did was legal? How can they determine that was lying if one truly thinks they were in the clear? Isn't this where intention comes into play?
 
How will Hillary be charged with lying to Congress if in her mind she believes what she did was legal? How can they determine that was lying if one truly thinks they were in the clear? Isn't this where intention comes into play?

They only result of all of this nonsense will be a repeat of 98. Congressional Republicans are very much like JPP republicans - just give em enough rope, they'll hang themselves. Just watch.
 
I have with Desh in the past. I've called out lots of lefties, I've even made board enemies among some of them. That's a fact. I gave up with Desh because I just basically chilled out in general, you know life is good, it's the internet, meh. And also because Desh went to bat for me big time when one of the slimes here put a rape threat directly to me in his signature. She went sideways over it on the board, and I never forgot that. He was forced to remove it. I appreciated that, I guess in what Tom would mock as a "the sistahs" kind of way. I think there's a part of me that appreciates seeing a "sistah" give even better than she gets. Sue me? :)

I'll give you credit in that I've actually seen you have discussions/disagreements with other board liberals. The rest seem to have signed a non compete cause. To each his own as to what they do on this board but I'll be damned if some p*ssy like Zappa tries to call me out. In his defense he did call out Desh once. It was when she insulted Mott. LOL.
 
I'll give you credit in that I've actually seen you have discussions/disagreements with other board liberals. The rest seem to have signed a non compete cause. To each his own as to what they do on this board but I'll be damned if some p*ssy like Zappa tries to call me out. In his defense he did call out Desh once. It was when she insulted Mott. LOL.

LOL really? I missed it! I insulted Mott once a long time ago, I called him a sexist prick. LOL. He probably doesn't even remember.
 
Does Trump run TV ads? But to your point I agree.

Does Trump even have any intention of being President? I read this really f'd up article in the NY Times today where he refused to rule out never taking office IF ELECTED. What in hell is that all about? I had no idea what to make of it, I should have posted it.
 
LOL really? I missed it! I insulted Mott once a long time ago, I called him a sexist prick. LOL. He probably doesn't even remember.
Oh that was a long time ago. It was shortly after Damo started JPP and you made a derogatory comment about guys who marry younger women and I called you out on it as I married a younger woman who is about to kill me cause I forgot to take the trash out today.
 
Does Trump even have any intention of being President? I read this really f'd up article in the NY Times today where he refused to rule out never taking office IF ELECTED. What in hell is that all about? I had no idea what to make of it, I should have posted it.

This has been the theory all along, he is just running to improve his brand, which isn't happening and to destroy the Republican Party which is happening.
 
Oh that was a long time ago. It was shortly after Damo started JPP and you made a derogatory comment about guys who marry younger women and I called you out on it as I married a younger woman who is about to kill me cause I forgot to take the trash out today.

I doubt that, though I don't remember the circumstances. I won't get into why here, but a comment like that would be extremely unlikely from me. It would have been something else, or there is some context you are dropping here. I thought it was about pornography, but it was a long time ago and I really only have a vague impression.
 
This has been the theory all along, he is just running to improve his brand, which isn't happening and to destroy the Republican Party which is happening.

Yeah but he might not take office if he's elected? That's crazy! So it's really all a big reality show? I can't get my mind around this.
 
I do, but it was before we understood his sexist, prick humor. :)

Do you remember if I made a comment against men who marry younger women? This seems nearly impossible. I feel like Mott is trying to cover up some pornography thing, you know how they are. But maybe I was needling someone? I don't know.
 
So, they are now going to try to get her on lying to Congress, how can it be lying when she truly believed she didn't send any classified informations, these guys are such dullards, and the State Dept, is saying they weren't classified. These Republicans are fools.

ROFLMAO Rancid is now channeling George Constanza in defending Crooked Hillary. It gets better and better

 
You're never going to get any support from a milquetoast like wacko.

It's always going to be more important for him to be in the "cool posters" clique than it is to call out such vile misogyny.

Who are the "cool posters" on the board Zap?
 
How will Hillary be charged with lying to Congress if in her mind she believes what she did was legal? How can they determine that was lying if one truly thinks they were in the clear? Isn't this where intention comes into play?


George Bush thought he was telling the truth about WMD but it doesn't stop you lefties from accusing him of lying. But as we saw this week, there are different standards with Crooked Hillary
 
George Bush thought he was telling the truth about WMD but it doesn't stop you lefties from accusing him of lying. But as we saw this week, there are different standards with Crooked Hillary

Oh, dear. You tried to draw a comparison with Bush.

For starters, Bush knowingly lied about intel they had gotten from a source known as "Curveball," about mobile bio-weapons labs in Iraq. He got a PDB the day before a State of the Union address discrediting Curveball & his claims, but that didn't stop him from lying in his speech about the existence of mobile bio-weapons labs.

Beyond that, you can call it what you want, but "fixing the intel around the policy" is inherently dishonest. Cherrypicking intel to present a lopsided case to Congress, the U.N. and the American people - to start a war - is far more egregious an offense in terms of dishonesty than talking about a few emails that didn't do nuthin' to nobody.
 
it does actually, you were trying to claim that I removed from my signature which I didn't. If you don't like being factually correct that is on you.

So now, tell us why you think hitting a woman is such a bad thing? Are you still set in the 1950s? Aren't women tough? Can't they go to war? Why so offended?

No, it doesn't make a bit of difference whether it was a photo or your signature, actually.

But color me SHOCKED you'd try to find some excuse for your misogynistic ignorance.
 
Back
Top