Hillary Clinton has been investigated at least 8 times for ethics and other violation

Hillary Clinton has been investigated at least 8 times for ethics, security and other violations.

:truestory:


Hillary is the Only First Lady to Be Fingerprinted by the FBI

During Bill Clinton’s presidency, the FBI fingerprinted both Bill and Hillary over concerns that the two had inappropriate access to FBI files. This was similar to what had been done during Richard Nixon’s time and therefore the FBI fingerprinted the Clintons to see if there was any proof they had handled the files in question. It was determined that they had not, yet two years later, some of the files were found in her home, with her fingerprints on them.

Hillary Clinton Was the First and Only First Lady To Be Subpoenaed by the FBI

During Bill Clinton’s presidency, the couple was accused of being involved in the Whitewater Development scandal. They invested in the company without knowing that the company was continuing to sell vacation homes and properties that they had no ability to deliver on. While the Clintons were subpoenaed and investigated in regard to the project, they were found innocent of any wrongdoing.


She was a trend setter even as first....first....well "lady"......
 
not being charged does not equal exonerated.....everyone knows she did it, even those who failed to charge her......even they said she was extremely careless......does that sound like exoneration to you, gomer....

It doesn't sound like either an indictment nor a conviction. Does it sound like either one to you?
 
Hillary is the Only First Lady to Be Fingerprinted by the FBI

During Bill Clinton’s presidency, the FBI fingerprinted both Bill and Hillary over concerns that the two had inappropriate access to FBI files. This was similar to what had been done during Richard Nixon’s time and therefore the FBI fingerprinted the Clintons to see if there was any proof they had handled the files in question. It was determined that they had not, yet two years later, some of the files were found in her home, with her fingerprints on them.

Hillary Clinton Was the First and Only First Lady To Be Subpoenaed by the FBI

During Bill Clinton’s presidency, the couple was accused of being involved in the Whitewater Development scandal. They invested in the company without knowing that the company was continuing to sell vacation homes and properties that they had no ability to deliver on. While the Clintons were subpoenaed and investigated in regard to the project, they were found innocent of any wrongdoing.


She was a trend setter even as first....first....well "lady"......
if she's elected she will be the first president who isn't qualified for a security clearance......
 
It sure as hell does. You are not guilty until proven so. Was she proven guilty? Nope. = not guilty.

Comprende?

not at all......you're just another fool who doesn't understand the law......you are guilty the minute you commit the act.......you are presumed to be innocent by the courts until you have been proven guilty.....in Hillary's case the courts are the only ones left who could possibly presume her to be innocent....and even that is because they aren't allowed to react rationally to what she has done.......
 
"In a settlement, Palm Beach agreed to waive those fines — if Trump’s club made a $100,000 donation to a specific charity for veterans. Instead, Trump sent a check from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, a charity funded almost entirely by other people’s money, according to tax records."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...c88f9c-7d11-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html

And it's not the only instance.

attach a copy of the settlement........thanks in advance......
 
not at all......you're just another fool who doesn't understand the law......you are guilty the minute you commit the act.......you are presumed to be innocent by the courts until you have been proven guilty.....in Hillary's case the courts are the only ones left who could possibly presume her to be innocent....and even that is because they aren't allowed to react rationally to what she has done.......

You demonstrate your complete ignorance if the law, moron. Quit, before you embarrass yourself further.
 
Call it what you fucking want. He was required to pay $100,000 PERSONALLY. The foundation was NOT part of the lawsuit. He was.

This part about Trump is really funny....from the link....

Trump founded his charity in 1987 and for years was its only donor. But in 2006, Trump gave away almost all the money he had donated to the foundation, leaving it with just $4,238 at year’s end, according to tax records.


Then, he transformed the Trump Foundation into something rarely seen in the world of philanthropy: a name-branded foundation whose namesake provides none of its money. Trump gave relatively small donations in 2007 and 2008, and afterward, nothing.


First they imply something amiss with his foundation because he was the only one that donated to it....

Then they imply something fishy because he didn't donate any money.....


The pinheads out sniffing around Trump can make up their minds in their effort to smear him with something.....
 
You demonstrate your complete ignorance if the law, moron. Quit, before you embarrass yourself further.

I'm sorry gomer, but what I stated is completely accurate......I can assure you that after being engaged in the practice of law for the last 36 years I know more about the law than some punk liberal who may or may not have a college degree.....
 
attach a copy of the settlement........thanks in advance......

It's public record, douchebag, and well-documented. Pull your head out of your ass and do your own homework. You'll find as many articles as you care to read. But you won't because you choose to remain willfully ignorant.
 
Back
Top