Check out Rachel Maddow explain how Trump has no path to victory

T

The_Donald

Perfect Hair
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Seriously people jerking off on network TV should not be allowed
 
I wonder why there are no comments on my post which revolve around the truth...................Perhaps Rachel will kick in
 
A couple of things should be noted from Rachel Madcow's analysis

1) The entire two minute clip revolves around the Electoral College and the path to victory there in. There is ZERO mention of the popular vote. Not one mention
2) There is no mention of Russian interference

No, Rachel Madcow is 100% certain that Hillary Clinton will win. She is beyond confident.
 
I suspect that you guys will focus on this stuff for awhile - that and Hillary losing are the only exciting things about this election for you.

You don't want to think too much about who is actually going to be President in a little over a week.
 
Thing1 said:
I suspect that you guys will focus on this stuff for awhile - that and Hillary losing are the only exciting things about this election for you.

You don't want to think too much about who is actually going to be President in a little over a week.
Click to expand...
lol, how true for me.
I'm almost ecstatic Hillary lost. Not so much Trump being president but better than the alternative.
 
Thing1 said:
I suspect that you guys will focus on this stuff for awhile - that and Hillary losing are the only exciting things about this election for you.

You don't want to think too much about who is actually going to be President in a little over a week.
Click to expand...

just curious, but do you really think that hillary was the better candidate? remember, I also voted Johnson
 
Thing1 said:
I suspect that you guys will focus on this stuff for awhile - that and Hillary losing are the only exciting things about this election for you.

You don't want to think too much about who is actually going to be President in a little over a week.
Click to expand...

You don't think Election Day was exciting? I wouldn't think you would think Hillary losing was exciting, but Election Night was exciting no matter what side you were one. I know you expected her to win. So much so that the prospect that she lost still hasn't sunk in for you. And in your brain the only way she could have lost was due to nefarious means. That is why you have glommed onto this Russian story.

What is there to think about with regards to Trump? We can speculate all we want, but until he actually does something it is just mental masturbation.
 
Double Tap said:
You don't think Election Day was exciting? I wouldn't think you would think Hillary losing was exciting, but Election Night was exciting no matter what side you were one. I know you expected her to win. So much so that the prospect that she lost still hasn't sunk in for you. And in your brain the only way she could have lost was due to nefarious means. That is why you have glommed onto this Russian story.

What is there to think about with regards to Trump? We can speculate all we want, but until he actually does something it is just mental masturbation.
Click to expand...

I'm not really one of those who think it was because of "nefarious means." I'm more alarmed that Russia is trying to interfere in our elections just in general.
 
Thing1 said:
Hillary was a terrible candidate. But yeah - she was a better candidate than tweety.
Click to expand...

apparently a majority of the nation didn't believe that. it's still my opinion that the RNC and DNC decided to have a contest of who could come up with the absolute worst candidate......the DNC won that competition.
 
Thing1 said:
I'm not really one of those who think it was because of "nefarious means." I'm more alarmed that Russia is trying to interfere in our elections just in general.
Click to expand...

were you equally alarmed that we were meddling in Israel's elections "in general"?

Why are you alarmed? What is shocking about it? Is this the first you have heard of governments trying to meddle in our elections?

What about Teddy Kennedy trying to enlist the Soviet Union in defeating Ronald Reagan? And please don't give me the boiler plate "Oh, I thought that was wrong too"

http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/te...eagan-opinions-columnists-peter-robinson.html
Really delve in show me the outrage you are showing now. Show me you aren't being selective in your outrage
 
Queen Snowflake said:
Groan
Click to expand...

yes, yes, we know. you believe that 4 years ago hillary clinton was one of the most corrupt politicians ever who would do anything and say anything to get elected. something that obama also believed, but miraculously 4 years later she became one of the most qualified persons EVER to be president, including better qualified than obama and her husband bill.................:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top