There is No World War 3

tsuke said:
View attachment 4836

https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/there-is-no-world-war-3/

There is No World War 3

Since the start of his Presidency Democrats and some Neocon republicans have been stating that Trump will start World War 3 with his tweets and behavior. This is false and an outright lie.

None of the facts around the world geopolitical situation call for a World War. It would even be difficult to imagine the tweets causing an escalation that could lead to a World War. For us to accept that this is true then we would have to accept that all the major players in the world such as China, US, RUssia, etc make their decisions based on hurt feelings in tweets instead of cold calculated national interest.

World War 1 and 2

There is a key component missing in todays political situation when we compare it to the events leading up to both previous world wars. In both instances the central powers and the axis countries both believed that they had a chance of winning. They believed that they had at the very least military parity with their opponents. That situation does not apply today.

If any war were to start the US would have complete and total control of all oceans. Every single coastal city controlled by the enemy would be reduced to rubble. Please note that these coastal cities are usually the most economically valuable areas in any country. Any country that would participate in the new world war would face immediate financial ruin. Even China acknowledges this which is why they are pushing very hard for their land based new silk road trade route.

The United States armed forces are actually very good in conventional battle. They managed to take apart the Iraqi army in less than a month which was the fourth largest army in the world at that time. It only suffers against insurgencies as it was never designed to fight that kind of war. Any "world war" would be closer to conventional warfare than one against an insurgency.

Geopolitically the rest of the world would never unite against the US. In the middle east Iran and Saudi Arabia would always be on different sides. In Europe Russia and the EU would be on opposite sides. In Asia China would be on one side while almost all the other countries would be on the other. Due to the national interests of these nations there is very little chance they would band together no matter what Trump tweets. This means the US will always have half the world as its allies.

China

China is the second largest economic and military power in the world. A major reason why a world war would be impossible right now is that they do not want one. Ask yourself this. Why would they want one? Given the current status quo they are already making great strides in catching up to the US. They may even be able to replace the current American worldwide hegemony with a Chinese one in this century. On a side note if you believe that America is a racist country you will be amazed at what the Chinese will do.

In a recent interview Bannon said that if nothing changes in the next 30 years the American Hegemony would be transitioning to a Chinese one. Intelligence reports have also stated that the Chinese are rising as the greatest threat to the US world order. The Chinese have incentive to keep the status quo going as they are winning in it. A world war would be one of the few things that can actually derail China's ascendancy.*

Fearmongers

As we can see there is absolutely no basis for any World War 3 scenario yet "foreign policy experts" usually of Democrat or NeverTrumper affiliation predict that Trump will start World War 3. These people should either provide a scenario where this will happen or lose their credentials.*
Click to expand...

Do you think we are still living in the 20th Century?

Today, in the instant information age, all your scenarios of a World War are antiquated, one wrong missile launch could lead to disaster
 
archives said:
Do you think we are still living in the 20th Century?

Today, in the instant information age, all your scenarios of a World War are antiquated, one wrong missile launch could lead to disaster
Click to expand...
nothing new about that.
We went thru a whole Cold War with Russia and the Cuban missile crisis with the same MAD scenario
 
archcries said:
Today, in the instant information age, all your scenarios of a World War are antiquated, one wrong missile launch could lead to disaster
Click to expand...

....for North Korea. Yep, it would be terrible if that smart guy Kim Jung MentallyIll were to lead his nation to disaster in Liberal dumbfuckland.

It is fascinating how quick you liberal morons are to denounce our guy when it is the maniacal moron in NK that is threatening war and trying to build a nuke. You lefties really are a bunch of buffoonish idiots.
 
archives said:
Do you think we are still living in the 20th Century?

Today, in the instant information age, all your scenarios of a World War are antiquated, one wrong missile launch could lead to disaster
Click to expand...

lets say the US preemptively launches a nuke at pyongyang. It would still not start world war 3 because of all the reaons i mentioned.
 
noise said:
ROFL.
First off that was NBC fake news -completely discredited about the "tenfold increase"

Secondly that was a year ago from Joe Scarborough - who's show with fellow elitists Mika is a 3 hour Trump hate fest every day.
Scarborough referenced an un-sourced "foreign affair advisor"

2 baskets of un-sourced and fake news, and you still bite ??? damn. you are what circus performers call a 'rube'
Click to expand...

No, idiot.
Not "fake news" you lying sack of shit.
Rex Tillerson verified it himself in fact calling Trump a "fucking moron" after the July 20 2017 meeting.

You are a bloviating liar.
 
Rune said:
No, idiot.n
Not "fake news" you lying sack of shit.
Rex Tillerson verified it himself in fact calling Trump a "fucking moron" after the July 20 2017 meeting.

You are a bloviating liar.
Click to expand...
you sir are a fucking liar. Once again you are posting NBC Fake news.
State denied it, Tillerson won't dignify with an answer..NBC publishes rank news
 
tsuke said:
View attachment 4836

https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/there-is-no-world-war-3/

There is No World War 3

Since the start of his Presidency Democrats and some Neocon republicans have been stating that Trump will start World War 3 with his tweets and behavior. This is false and an outright lie.

None of the facts around the world geopolitical situation call for a World War. It would even be difficult to imagine the tweets causing an escalation that could lead to a World War. For us to accept that this is true then we would have to accept that all the major players in the world such as China, US, RUssia, etc make their decisions based on hurt feelings in tweets instead of cold calculated national interest.

World War 1 and 2

There is a key component missing in todays political situation when we compare it to the events leading up to both previous world wars. In both instances the central powers and the axis countries both believed that they had a chance of winning. They believed that they had at the very least military parity with their opponents. That situation does not apply today.

If any war were to start the US would have complete and total control of all oceans. Every single coastal city controlled by the enemy would be reduced to rubble. Please note that these coastal cities are usually the most economically valuable areas in any country. Any country that would participate in the new world war would face immediate financial ruin. Even China acknowledges this which is why they are pushing very hard for their land based new silk road trade route.

The United States armed forces are actually very good in conventional battle. They managed to take apart the Iraqi army in less than a month which was the fourth largest army in the world at that time. It only suffers against insurgencies as it was never designed to fight that kind of war. Any "world war" would be closer to conventional warfare than one against an insurgency.

Geopolitically the rest of the world would never unite against the US. In the middle east Iran and Saudi Arabia would always be on different sides. In Europe Russia and the EU would be on opposite sides. In Asia China would be on one side while almost all the other countries would be on the other. Due to the national interests of these nations there is very little chance they would band together no matter what Trump tweets. This means the US will always have half the world as its allies.

China

China is the second largest economic and military power in the world. A major reason why a world war would be impossible right now is that they do not want one. Ask yourself this. Why would they want one? Given the current status quo they are already making great strides in catching up to the US. They may even be able to replace the current American worldwide hegemony with a Chinese one in this century. On a side note if you believe that America is a racist country you will be amazed at what the Chinese will do.

In a recent interview Bannon said that if nothing changes in the next 30 years the American Hegemony would be transitioning to a Chinese one. Intelligence reports have also stated that the Chinese are rising as the greatest threat to the US world order. The Chinese have incentive to keep the status quo going as they are winning in it. A world war would be one of the few things that can actually derail China's ascendancy.*

Fearmongers

As we can see there is absolutely no basis for any World War 3 scenario yet "foreign policy experts" usually of Democrat or NeverTrumper affiliation predict that Trump will start World War 3. These people should either provide a scenario where this will happen or lose their credentials.*
Click to expand...







Because even the fat nutter kid in Korea know hes a slobbering fucking hot air bag now
 
noise said:
you sir are a fucking liar. Once again you are posting NBC Fake news.
State denied it, Tillerson won't dignify with an answer..NBC publishes rank news
Click to expand...
No, he won’t answer truthfully because he knows Trump is pissed
 
Corazón said:
I wonder if Rana will admonish Runatic for using the word cunt?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

you are alive because of a cunt


using slur names to describe the human body parts that create the next generation makes you a bag of rancid dicks
 
noise said:
you sir are a fucking liar. Once again you are posting NBC Fake news.
State denied it, Tillerson won't dignify with an answer..NBC publishes rank news
Click to expand...

that is not proof idiot


lets remember all the things this admin denied vociferously that turned out to be true
 
Nothing in this thread is provable.
No journalists should "lose credentials" for speculating what the Orange Hog's reckless behavior might portend.
The past is no guarantee of future results. i.e.
The fact that the Korean war did not end in nuclear war does not guarantee it would not escalate if Kim Jong Un and Trump, either of them, did the unthinkable.
Disagree with the Russobots blaming NATO.
Glad the Orange Hog reaffirmed his commitment to South Korea's defense in strong terms the other day, even if he did a sidebar about his golf course and other patronizing BS. (yuck)
 
noise said:
completely ignoring the context of Tillerson's comments in favor of inside information you don't have.
rank partisanship that encourages yet more fake news
Click to expand...
I know when something said is untruthful, honest people come out and say, “I never called Trump a moron”, Tillerman didn’t do that, he skated around it, which leads me to believe he called Trump a moron, you are free to believe what you wish.
 
Covfefe said:
I know when something said is untruthful honest people come out and say, “I never called Trump a moron”, Tillerman didntvdo that, he skated around it, which leads me to believe he called Trump a moron, you are free to believe what you wish.
Click to expand...
you can make unsubstantiated garbage all day long, but it's still worthless trash talk.

There are others in the administration that backed up this was fake news. his spokesperson specifically denied it.
Tillerson was back-handing gossipy DC politics. I don't expect intellectual honesty from rank partisans
-but there it is
 
noise said:
you can make unsubstantiated garbage all day long, but it's still worthless trash talk.

There are others in the administration that backed up this was fake news. his spokesperson specifically denied it.
Tillerson was back-handing gossipy DC politics. I don't expect intellectual honesty from rank partisans
-but there it is
Click to expand...
Proof, please, there was only one person who claimed he didn’t say it and Tillerson himself didnt deny it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top