Dossier drafter Steele backs off his earlier claims when faced with libel action

[Sailor]

Apparently you don't know the difference between "could not" and "did not", you poor dumb bastard.

"Could not" and "did not" sum up the accomplishments of your life perfectly. You may think that is funny, those that are paying your welfare loving ass do not.

 

[zappasguitar]

I heard that you are a fat joke, Zappacrite.

Too bad your incessant dancing doesn't help you lose a few pounds, isn't it?

Now, dance my puppet.

I said, dance!

For a big time "internet troll" you sure are one easy SOB to trigger!

You have your self a Merry Christmas, alrightie Twinkles?

 

[Sailor]

For a big time "internet troll" you sure are one easy SOB to trigger!

You have your self a Merry Christmas, alrightie Twinkles?

HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Русский агент]

"Could not" and "did not" sum up the accomplishments of your life perfectly. You may think that is funny, those that are paying your welfare loving ass do not.

Please, virtue signal some more as you fling wild accusations.

Hilarious. You think that cancerous cunt needs your noble protection, Captain Crusader?

 

[Русский агент]

For a big time "internet troll" you sure are one easy SOB to trigger! You have your self a Merry Christmas, alrightie Twinkles?

I tell you to dance and you do You're always obedient to my commands, Zappacrite.

You pathetic puppet.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Read my above post re: UK legal system vs US.

The rest of your blather is just oversimplification. In civil matters, the truth is rarely as cut & dried as in criminal cases, so "proving" one's case is not always as easy as you and your Trumpsucker buddy are trying to make it appear.

If the guy has limited resources compared to accusers, he has to be extremely careful, possibly even backing off his claims out of fear of being financially ruined.

And as for that nonsense about the ACLU, they would only get involved if it was a civil rights case.

You highly ignorant fuck.

Speech you dumbfuck.

The burden of proof is lower in civil cases, dumbfuck. And here, the initial BOP would be on the plaintiff , dumbfuck.

You're making wild ass excuses for this guy recanting. Prove that is the case here or STFU, dumbfuck.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Last night "legal eagle" Soymad thought Trump was a party to the case, apparently.



Libel law in the UK is vastly different, despite Soymad's ignorant assertion.

"English laws are much more favorable for someone looking to protect their reputation," says Jenny Afia, a lawyer in London who often represents people making libel and privacy claims. "Crooks and brigands from around the world come here to launder their reputations, where they couldn't get exculpation in either their home country or indeed in the United States of America," says Mark Stephens, a London lawyer who often represents media companies in these cases.

https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/03/21/394273902/on-libel-and-the-law-u-s-and-u-k-go-separate-ways


I enjoy Soymad's public humiliation.

Poor guy, always raging mad, maybe because he is wrong most of the time?

 

[Sailor]

Please, virtue signal some more as you fling wild accusations.

Hilarious. You think that cancerous cunt needs your noble protection, Captain Crusader?

This is not about protecting anyone. It is about common decency. I am assuming you have some.

 

[Ralph]

Poor guy, always raging mad, maybe because he is wrong most of the time?

Have anyone ever witnessed a LEFTY being RIGHT?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

I stand by my previous assertion.

The Times article is filled with innuendo, supposition and speculation.

Do you ever answer questions? You have, as far as I remember, always dodge mine.

Once again, what exactly is the supposition and speculation?

Do you approve when people don't answer your questions?

 

[Русский агент]

Speech you dumbfuck.

The burden of proof is lower in civil cases, dumbfuck. And here, the initial BOP would be on the plaintiff ��, dumbfuck.

You're making wild ass excuses for this guy recanting. Prove that is the case here or STFU, dumbfuck.

In the UK, defendant is the one who must prove absolute truth in defamation cases.

English defamation law puts the burden of proving the truth of allegedly defamatory statements on the defendant, rather than the plaintiff...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law

 

[Русский агент]

This is not about protecting anyone. It is about common decency. I am assuming you have some.

I don't recall being obliged to abide by your self-righteous judgments, Sailor boi.

Inflated sense of self-importance, Cap'n Crusader?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

This is not about protecting anyone. It is about common decency. I am assuming you have some.

Do you call Rune out for his near constant lack of (your words re nasty insults) common decency?

 

[Русский агент]

Have anyone ever witnessed a LEFTY being RIGHT?

If only Soymad and Zappacrite had actually read the article cited in the OP before they began to opprobriously opine.

They never seem to learn, do they?

Then cancer cunt jumped on the sinking scow without ascertaining any facts.

 

[Sailor]

Do you call Rune out for his near constant lack of (your words re nasty insults) common decency?

I would if he was picking on someone with cancer. That is fucked up.

 

[Русский агент]

Do you call Rune out for his near constant lack of (your words re nasty insults) common decency?

I seem to recall that he does not. He has even defended Rune, vouching for his status as a "marine engineer", if memory serves.

Shipmates?

 

[Русский агент]

I would if he was picking on someone with cancer. That is fucked up.

So you say.

I hope she dies slowly, in constant, hideous pain the entire remainder of her miserable existence. She deserves it.

 

[Sailor]

I don't recall being obliged to abide by your self-righteous judgments, Sailor boi.

Inflated sense of self-importance, Cap'n Crusader?

So you have no common decency. Got it.

 

[Sailor]

I seem to recall that he does not. He has even defended Rune, vouching for his status as a "marine engineer", if memory serves.

Shipmates?

Mariners. The both of us. Something you would never understand nor be able to do. That whole manicured hands thing you got going on there.

 

[Русский агент]

Poor guy, always raging mad, maybe because he is wrong most of the time?

He's been demonstrably wrong twice in this thread alone, hasn't he?