NYT op-ed demands voting rights for felons. Democrats love this.

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
OK dems, then lets also return gun rights to felons. Hell - gun rights are a constitutional right while voting is not.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/...llection/sectioncollection/opinion-editorials

jan 2 2018 Today, Florida disenfranchises almost 1.5 million of its citizens, more than 11 states’ populations and roughly a quarter of the more than six million Americans who are unable to vote because of a criminal record.

Felon disenfranchisement is a destructive, pointless policy that hurts not only individuals barred from the ballot box, but American democracy at large. Its post-Civil War versions are explicitly racist, and its modern-day rationales are thin to nonexistent. It can make all the difference in places like Florida, which didn’t stop being competitive in 2000; the state remains a major presidential battleground, and victories for both parties in state and local elections are often narrow.

That could all change if a proposed constitutional amendment gets enough signatures to be placed on the ballot in November and wins enough support. The initiative would automatically restore voting rights to the vast majority of Floridians who have completed their sentence for a felony conviction, including any term of parole or probation.
 
I sure do, once you serve your time, you should be able to vote. You should not be punished indefinitely.
 
I am surprised to find you have libeling me in private. At least according to Yurt, if he is to be believed.
So basically, you can fuck off.

First off I have no idea what you are talking about.

Second I have Yurt on ignore and don't talk to him on this board let alone any private conversation.

Why are you talking to him?
 
I am surprised to find you have libeling me in private. At least according to Yurt, if he is to be believed.
So basically, you can fuck off.

Maybe there is a joke here that I'm missing but aren't you libeling me by claiming I talk to Yurt privately?
 
I am surprised to find you have libeling me in private. At least according to Yurt, if he is to be believed.
So basically, you can fuck off.
actually it was grind, it was in public (it is impossible to "libel" someone in private) and truth is a legal defense to libel.....are you formally denying what he stated?......
 
actually it was grind, it was in public (it is impossible to "libel" someone in private) and truth is a legal defense to libel.....are you formally denying what he stated?......

This is what he's talking about? So not only is he confusing me with Grind he's claiming what Grind wrote on this public board is something I said in private?

That's a serious 0 - 2 right there.
 
Back
Top