Many hunters use AR15's

[Superfreak]

That was not the question being addressed in this thread.

What you had here was a bunch of rightwing know-it-alls, and arm chair experts claiming there is basically no difference between traditional hunting rifles, and modified-for-civilian-sale military assault rifles.

One-shot, one kill, skill, and stealth is what most hunters I know appreciate about their sport.

Laying down a hailstorm of lead on a deer, will high velocity bullets designed to pulverize flesh is not the kind of traditional, skill-based, one-shot-one-kill hunting I am familiar with.

Again the little leg humper displays his ignorance on the topic. He insists upon trying to label the AR15 a 'military assault rifle'. His last sentence is truly comical.

 

[Superfreak]

But all you and your rightwing buddies have done is offer unsubstantiated assertion and empty slogans.

I am not surprised you only had a irrelevant, one sentence retort to this trauma surgeon.

This trauma surgeon (who is an avid hunter himself) explained the fundamental differences between AR 15 assault rifles and traditional hunting rifles with a high degree of expertise, supported by mathematics, engineering, and physiology. He made an expert and credible case in a way I have never seen a rightwing gun humper on this forum ever do.

no moron, the trauma surgeon displayed his lack of knowledge just as you did.

 

[Airstrip One]

lol

Just full of the concocted bullshit, aren’t you? Reality, pal, is not your friend. What DID happen is that weaponry DID progress. Why are you hung up on things that never occurred?

Because your fellow lefttards have been telling me this over the past couple of weeks.

 

[domer76]

Because your fellow lefttards have been telling me this over the past couple of weeks.

Yeah, sure they have.

 

[katzgar]

No, you don't.

You can drop a deer right where it stands if you know what you're doing.

and now you just look like an idiot

 

[Q-Tip]

and now you just look like an idiot

You obviously know nothing about deer hunting.

 

[countryboy]

This thread,is a perfect example of gun nuts justify anything to pretend a weapon of war,is just another hunting gun to hunt sparrows!

We don't need to justify shit, because the second amendment has nothing to do with hunting sparrows. But you already knew that, didn't you?

 

[Airstrip One]

Yeah, sure they have.

What's that?

More proof that Desh is a liar.


Michael Moore admits that liberals want to repeal the Second Amendment.

Taking to Facebook in the aftermath of the Las Vegas shooting, Moore penned a lengthy post laying out his "proposal" to rid us of our right to bear arms.

"I, Michael Moore, along with all who support an end to this epidemic of gun violence, propose a new Amendment to our Constitution that repeals the ancient and outdated 2nd Amendment (which was written before bullets and revolvers were even invented), and replaces it with a new 28th Amendment that guarantees everyone the right to be free of, and protected from, gun violence," wrote Moore.

According to Moore, "the public’s safety comes ahead of an individual’s right to own and fire a gun. Believing that having a gun in your home provides you with protection is an American myth."





http://www.dailywire.com/news/21943/michael-moore-calls-repeal-outdated-2nd-amendment-amanda-prestigiacomo#

 

[CFM]

Calm down Banjo, I was merely making an observation.

You made the observation, which was easy. I gave the explanation you apparently weren't able to do.

 

[domer76]

What's that?

Hmmm. Where is the mention about muskets? Where is the list of all those leftists you claim.

He is correct, however. The 2nd is a vestige of the 18th century. Much like the 3rd and the 7th.

 

[CFM]

No one in the military would take an AR15 into battle. They would take the M16. Your comment is a perfect example of someone who regurgitates talking points from the media without bothering to educate himself on the topic.

They wouldn't last long if they did. The idiot gun haters call something a weapon of war that no one would be issued to take to war nor anyone in their right mind take.

 

[CFM]

Hmmm. Where is the mention about muskets? Where is the list of all those leftists you claim.

He is correct, however. The 2nd is a vestige of the 18th century. Much like the 3rd and the 7th.

When should I expect you to come and get my guns if you claim the amendment protecting my right to own them is a vestige of the 18th century? You've posted picture claiming it was me and where I live. What's the hold up, boy?

 

[Airstrip One]

Hmmm. Where is the mention about muskets? Where is the list of all those leftists you claim.

He is correct, however. The 2nd is a vestige of the 18th century. Much like the 3rd and the 7th.

Oh, did the musket not exist in the 18th Century?

And how is the 7th Amendment no longer relevant?

 

[RB 60]

Hmmm. Where is the mention about muskets? Where is the list of all those leftists you claim.

He is correct, however. The 2nd is a vestige of the 18th century. Much like the 3rd and the 7th.

So was the 14th. The 14th was written to give former/freed slaves and their families citizenship (which I wholeheartedly agree with).
It was NOT written for illegals to come here to have their litters and those litters become American citizens.

 

[moon]

It was NOT written for illegals to come here to have their litters and those litters become American citizens.

You're a disgrace. Of course, your Constitutional rights permit you to be a loud-mouthed racist disgrace- and mine to identify you as one.

 

[domer76]

Oh, did the musket not exist in the 18th Century?

And how is the 7th Amendment no longer relevant?

1) Stupid question
2) $20? Really? The same now as in 1790?

 

[RB 60]

You're a disgrace. Of course, your Constitutional rights permit you to be a loud-mouthed racist disgrace- and mine to identify you as one.

Where have I mentioned race you ignorant twit? Illegal isn't a race.

 

[moon]

Where have I mentioned race you ignorant twit? Illegal isn't a race.

You're judged by implication.

 

[CFM]

You're a disgrace. Of course, your Constitutional rights permit you to be a loud-mouthed racist disgrace- and mine to identify you as one.

Your rights permit you to be a loud mouthed, cowardly raghead and mine to prove you're one, which has been done many times.

 

[CFM]

1) Stupid question
2) $20? Really? The same now as in 1790?

1) Cowardly diversion
2) Yes, the $20 that was stated in 1790 still says $20 today.