According to science, gun-humpers have feelings of inadequecy

Gun sales are down but up among minorities. Does that mean minorities now doubt their ability to protect their family, are insecure about their place in the job market, and have racial fears?
 
Cypress said:
...And are fearful of black people.
According to science anyway...
Obviously, these are statistically significant trends, but do not imply all gun humpers are bigots and mediocre losers.
Click to expand...

"Feelings of inadequecy"??

Embarrassed by their own "shortcomings"??

Afraid they just don't "measure up"??

:rofl2:
 
Cypress said:
...And are fearful of black people.
According to science anyway...
Obviously, these are statistically significant trends, but do not imply all gun humpers are bigots and mediocre losers.
Click to expand...

Davy Crockett and men of the Secret Service had/have feelings of inadequacy ...didn't know that
 
Sirthinksalot said:
It's Trump's fault, dontcha know! :rofl2:[/QUOTTE]

Strange how feelings of inadequacy flipped from whites to minorities.

I have known many sociologists and they already believe gun owners are insecure in their masculinity and have small genitals. So, I'm not too surprised a sociological study verified what they already believe. Many would question whether sociology can be called a "science."
Click to expand...
 
Flash said:
Strange how feelings of inadequacy flipped from whites to minorities.

I have known many sociologists and they already believe gun owners are insecure in their masculinity and have small genitals. So, I'm not too surprised a sociological study verified what they already believe. Many would question whether sociology can be called a "science."
Click to expand...

It's known as a "soft science"
 
Flash said:
Gun sales are down but up among minorities. Does that mean minorities now doubt their ability to protect their family, are insecure about their place in the job market, and have racial fears?[/QUOTE
it is because real black people hate you and your damned us gov. as much as i do. you are the enemy. guns and the 2nd amendment are because of you deluded sickos. you are the enemy of freedom and the american way of life. all military personnel have sworn to defend the land and people against you. you will be easily subdued. the corrupted military personnel believe their job is to defend the us gov. :agencies, departments, "institutions" , etc. . these domestic enemies are identified as "the deepstate". these are the damned and you are a co conspirator to "it".
Click to expand...
 
Ralph said:
Yep.....SUGGESTS is a real scientific term. :laugh:
Click to expand...

It is perfectly acceptable and routinely used in scientific writing, for reasons I have neither the time nor inclination to explain to scientifically illiterate dunces like you.

"There is now good observational evidence suggesting that the early universe underwent a period of inflationary expansion. Most theoretical models of inflation involve a scalar field rolling down its potential. ".....Our results then suggest that the coefficient of the R2 term must be at most of order 108, and maybe much lower, but N is unconstrained (except by the requirement that the large N approximation is valid so that AdS/CFT can be used)."

- from a scientific paper by Stephen Hawking, renowned theoretical physicist -
Cambridge University) et al. "Trace anomaly driven inflation". Oct 2000. 40 pp. Published in Phys.Rev. D63 (2001)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0010232.pdf
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Cypress said:
It is perfectly acceptable and routinely used in scientific writing, for reasons I have neither the time nor inclination to explain to scientifically illiterate dunces like you.

Click to expand...

I "reckon" that "consensus" and "suggestions" are acceptable in the theory stage of scientific development. science is law. theory is no more than speculation.
 
Flash said:
Real scientists would smirk at calling sociology science.
Click to expand...

The opinion of an obscure message boarder with seemingly no relevant academic or scholarly qualifications is irrelevant and inconsequential

Society at large has decided that economics, anthropology, history, sociology, psychology, linguistics, geography - social sciences all - are relevant and important areas of research and study for the benefit of human knowledge.
 
We have a name for this sort of science where I come from: HOGWASH

The left is becoming so predictable. Say “science” backs something ... from when life begins to sodomites and some never found gene to AGW ... now to this. Jiminy Christmas what a bunch of junk. They’ve even hijacked the Earth Day celebration making it about resisting Trump somehow And people are noticing this pattern too.

Propagandists always have their eyes on science. Because science occupies such an exalted place in our collective psyche, we must forever be watchful of attempts by political lobbies to seize and control what is put out before the public in the name of science.

http://www.opindia.com/2017/08/afte...ls-are-now-trying-to-hijack-and-kill-science/
 
Sirthinksalot said:
It's known as a "soft science"
Click to expand...

Yes, or "social science." They use scientific methods but must use very subjective terms when operationalizing their concepts. How do you write a question that really measures whether a person has feelings of inadequacy? There are ways to check validity and reliability, but Social Science Quarterly is a mid-level journal.
 
Flash said:
Yes, or "social science." They use scientific methods but must use very subjective terms when operationalizing their concepts. How do you write a question that really measures whether a person has feelings of inadequacy? There are ways to check validity and reliability, but Social Science Quarterly is a mid-level journal.
Click to expand...

this is farce science. the real people pray for an opening of understanding. I pray that eyes will be opened and understanding be granted by grace. Lord have mercy-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top