#1 Reason Comey didn’t charge Hillary

Legion said:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

IC. It's only a serious issue when you comment on it. :rolleyes:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?97275-The-movement-to-sexualize-kids

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Yurt

This is just a 12b thread bait thread
Click to expand...


Legion No, it's not. I love kids. This is a serious discussion of a critical issue.
 
Dark Soul said:
Definition of sepulchre
1 : a place of burial : tomb
2 : a receptacle for religious relics especially in an altar

What?
Click to expand...

Matthew 23:27 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."
 
christiefan915 said:
Matthew 23:27 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."
Click to expand...

Obviously you're using an outdated translation. Does it also say abortion is to be celebrated?
 
Legion said:
12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc, We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

Well, she was obviously in violation then, as she is suggesting I supported pedophelia, when the actual context of everything I posted about Duggar, was that of “ let’s wait and see”.

That didn’t change the fact, that my accusation about her being willing to think the worst wasn’t correct. She’s such a twit.
 
Last edited:
J Craft said:
Well, she was obviously in violation then as she suggesting I supported pedophelia, when the actual context of everything I posted about Duggar was that of “ let’s wait and see”.

That didn’t change the fact that my accusation about her being willing to think the worst want correct. She’s such a twit.
Click to expand...

I suspect that she feels entitled to cross the line because she thinks Rana will never agree to punish her.
 
christiefan915 said:
Matthew 23:27 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."
Click to expand...

If you owned a Bible, it'd be dusty, wouldn't it? :D
 
Nordberg said:
The FBI is not supposed to interfere in elections. Comey knew that, but did it anyway. He thought Hillary was going to win nearly everyone did. Comey is a lifetime Republican, but he knew what the polls were saying. He acted to help the FBI. Everything he did, helped Trump. It did not help Hillary. That proves he was doing his job as he saw it. The IG report says he should not have done that. The agency is careful not to get into politics. He did. But he helped Daffy. Comeys bias was toward the agency. How can anyone say it was pro Hillary when it kneecapped her? What is clear is your lack of logic and understanding. yeah, Comey showed Hillary bias by having a press conference that hurt her. You can believe anything you want, can't you?
Click to expand...

Comey released the info and declared her innocent ... only because he happily believed the Hillbag was a lock. He based his decision to act on that "fact". Had the coronation of the queen been in doubt, ... he would not have released the info. This is clear. :dunno:
 
Darth Omar said:
The New York office was jumping up and down about the emails found on Weiners laptop but they were being ignored by headquarters.

That sounds a bit like they were trying to keep from harming Hillary’s campaign. Or maybe you have a better explanation.
Click to expand...

While they were soaring in the air, they had a press conference about the emails. Strzok, who found them, told Comey he should release them. You rightys are so far under the right wing conspiracy umbrella that you cannot imagine people just doing their jobs, regardless of who gets hurt. You guys project your blind ass bias where it does not exist. Yeah, some people ,properly, thought Trump is a horrible joke on American politics. But they still did their jobs. Turned out they were wrong. There were no new emails. Are you guys crying because that made such a terrible mistake that hurt Hillary and helped trump? You should be, if you are consistent.
 
Legion said:
I suspect that she feels entitled to cross the line because she thinks Rana will never agree to punish her.
Click to expand...

I suspect you didn't notice that the odious J Craft made a point of attacking me despite the fact that I said nothing to him, and haven't for ages.
 
Bigdog said:
Comey released the info and declared her innocent ... only because he happily believed the Hillbag was a lock. He based his decision to act on that "fact". Had the coronation of the queen been in doubt, ... he would not have released the info. This is clear. :dunno:
Click to expand...

Isn't it a fact that Comey altered his language on an official document prior to interviewing Hillary, Bigdog? I heard that the effect of his alteration was to preclude any criminal charges against the Hildebeast. Is that true?
 
Legion said:
Think so?

I posted news articles and a mature discussion involving how it effects people, etc.
Click to expand...

My thread on Josh Duggar and how his family dealt with his sickness was the same as yours. Funny how you agreed with me previously but are now on the attack.

We all know the history of that discussion and we also know that I wasn't suggesting that the odious J Craft was anything more than an apologist for the Duggars, because for one thing he agrees with their brand of Christianity. But go ahead and pretend I was insinuating otherwise. That's something you do well.
 
christiefan915 said:
So ask yourself why he feels compelled to do it when it has nothing to do with the thread. I guess you're giving him a pass because now you like him.
Click to expand...

I don't recall expressing any fondness for JC, and I'm unaware of any compelling reason to ask him why he dislikes you.

You seem anxious to distance the discussion from this hypothesis:

Legion said:
I suspect that she feels entitled to cross the line because she thinks Rana will never agree to punish her.
Click to expand...
 
christiefan915 said:
My thread on Josh Duggar and how his family dealt with his sickness was the same as yours. Funny how you agreed with me previously but are now on the attack. We all know the history of that discussion and we also know that I wasn't suggesting that the odious J Craft was anything more than an apologist for the Duggars, because for one thing he agrees with their brand of Christianity. But go ahead and pretend I was insinuating otherwise. That's something you do well.
Click to expand...

Suggesting what you seem to be implying about JC is not what I'd characterize as "mature discussion".
 
Legion said:
I don't recall expressing any fondness for JC, and I'm unaware of any compelling reason to ask him why he dislikes you.
Click to expand...

Yet you've sided with him and his insults while pretending you didn't agree with me about the Duggars when it all went down.

You seem anxious to distance the discussion from this hypothesis:
Click to expand...

"You seem anxious", is that your spidey sense at work? :rofl2:

There's nothing to distance from because no line was crossed. Everything I said about him was confirmed by the earlier threads, despite his attempts to whitewash his comments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top