The answers to your questions are in the links I provided you.
If they are, why haven't you cited the text than answers them?
The answers to your questions are in the links I provided you.
You're not using any of those terms correctly here.
If they are, why haven't you cited the text than answers them?
Legion code for: "I have no counter-argument so I'm going to stall".
I don't feed sea-lions.
I'm not feeding a sea-lion.
This is interesting:
Specifically, it tracks changes in total cash compensation full-time, private industry employees and education professionals in the United States. The PayScale Index has not been adjusted for inflation.
With inflation, the numbers are much worse. They do have a graph showing the sharp drop this past quarter when adjusted for inflation
- Are you claiming that everyone who responds to a poll is truthful?
They would have to purposfully be trying to game the PayScale index, which is unlikely, since the information submitted is for employees to compare their salaries to the market.- What questions were they asked?
They ask what level of college you completed, your current payrate, years of experience, location, male vs female, military experience, and a whole host of other data points, but those are the ones that stood out to me- What was the survey sample size?
It's current trend data from user input of over 35 million employee profiles- What were the demographic breakdowns?
There are over 250 compensable factors, some are listed above- What's a "Trump/Russia tax cut"?
Assuming he means the tax cuts implemented at the beginning of the year.
Looks like a lot of presuming and assuming.
Can you quote the questions PayScale is supposed to have asked and the poll demographics and sample size, and methodology with the relevant link?
Did federal withholding amounts decline as promised?
Is any of that untrue?
Looks like a lot of presuming and assuming.
According to polling, most Americans did not see an increase in their checks.
You don't know what those words mean, do you?
Still relying on polling whose methodologies you don't seem able to explain and about which you appear unable to answer a few questions?
Is that what you presume, or is it what you assume?
You're just stalling again.
The methodologies were explained, and your gaslight attempt failed.
They were? Cite the post
- Are you claiming that everyone who responds to a poll is truthful?
They would have to purposfully be trying to game the PayScale index, which is unlikely, since the information submitted is for employees to compare their salaries to the market.- What questions were they asked?
They ask what level of college you completed, your current payrate, years of experience, location, male vs female, military experience, and a whole host of other data points, but those are the ones that stood out to me- What was the survey sample size?
It's current trend data from user input of over 35 million employee profiles- What were the demographic breakdowns?
There are over 250 compensable factors, some are listed above- What's a "Trump/Russia tax cut"?
Assuming he means the tax cuts implemented at the beginning of the year.