Everyone is presumed innocent until they are convicted by a jury.
Just to show how screwed up this whole deal is, consider this: there’s nothing in Mullet’s mandate that would prevent him from investigating the Dossier, since it originated from Russians as opposition research.
Which is precisely what Junior conspired to do.
How does Mullet approach THAT investigation without undermining the basis for his own investigation? The Russian investigation, which Mullet subsumed, originated at least in part, with the very document he would be investigating.
He can’t. It’s just another point where Mullet is conflicted.
The comparion of the dossier with what Junior did is the argument of a desperate loser.
Continue to flounder on that lame claim.
Last edited:

