Kavanaugh is about to get the Merick Garland treatment!

Anytime there is an accuser, about anything, and it involves some kind of political nominee or candidate...it is politically orchestrated?

Think before you answer.

Anytime there is an accuser who has nothing but hearsay at the 11th hour to smear someone for political purposes, yes it is political. I want you to think and answer my questions instead of deflecting and being a dishonest buffoon. So answer me this; why wait forty years to come forward? Why didn't this come up when it occurred? Why didn't this come up in his 2006 confirmation? Why now?
 
Prior to knowledge that the anonymous letter bullshit with Feinstein wouldn't work snowflake. So answer me this; why wait forty years to come forward? Why didn't this come up when it occurred? Why didn't this come up in his 2006 confirmation? Why now?

You know the answers to this and are too dishonest to acknowledge what this really is. A despicable hit job using hearsay to smear a good person in front of his friends and family for partisan political purposes. Don't give me your sanctimonious lying that you care about the truth and facts. Nothing could be further from the truth.

This is the Democratic Party of the Jackasses last gasp tactic to delay a vote until they believe they can take over the House. Of course, the Senate is not theirs for the taking and a vote will take place regardless. But meanwhile, I good man has his reputation and name dragged through the mud by partisan hacks and you defend it.

You missed the point. Not a shocker.

It was always her choice - every step of the way. Sorry 'bout that.
 
I want him asked if he was a black out drinker in high school
I want every woman who signed that letter for him to be put under oath and see if their story is the same as in the letter
and all their ages to be revealed
I bet there are a lot of 70 year olds in there
teenage boys don't hit on women in their 30s

giphy.gif
 
There is a simple way to put this all to bed. Bring her int to testify in front of the committee tomorrow or Wednesday. Kavanaugh is ready
 
Anytime there is an accuser who has nothing but hearsay at the 11th hour to smear someone for political purposes, yes it is political. I want you to think and answer my questions instead of deflecting and being a dishonest buffoon.

I try sometimes, but you're really a waste of time to engage most of the time. Such an extreme hyper-partisan perspective. It has some value on the board, but can be tiring and useless to engage.

You can't even acknowledge the most basic facts and definitions.
 
You missed the point. Not a shocker.

It was always her choice - every step of the way. Sorry 'bout that.

What was her choice? To lie about a man forty years later to prevent him sitting on the Supreme Court? I am quite certain you don't even realize you don't have a point. You're blabbering stupidly here.

Again; why wait forty years to come forward? Why didn't this come up when it occurred? Why didn't this come up in his 2006 confirmation? Why now?
 
Anytime there is an accuser, about anything, and it involves some kind of political nominee or candidate...it is politically orchestrated?

Think before you answer.

Yes they are all politically orchestrated. This is where you go "yeah but Clinton"

This is all bullshit. If she has any proof to her claims she would have come forward sooner.

This is going to backfire big league on the democrats. Bring her in today and have her testify tomorrow. Let's put this to rest. No need to wait right?
 
There is a simple way to put this all to bed. Bring her int to testify in front of the committee tomorrow or Wednesday. Kavanaugh is ready

That's all that has to be done here. It's useless for all of us to talk about it as much as we do.

Let's hear them, and the committee members can decide if it deserves to be considered, and how much weight to give it.
 
Yes they are all politically orchestrated. This is where you go "yeah but Clinton"

This is all bullshit. If she has any proof to her claims she would have come forward sooner.

This is going to backfire big league on the democrats. Bring her in today and have her testify tomorrow. Let's put this to rest. No need to wait right?

The bolded ignores the stats. Many victims of assault take years to speak up, and some never come out at all.

I love the "backfire on Democrats." They're not doing anything except for saying she should be heard. Oooh.
 
I have a feeling you don't go on many dates.

It's weird how so many republicans are so quick to equate attempted rape, with sex with consenting females.

The fact that he did not succeed in finalizing the rape presents a problem for them. If he had, they would say it was consensual. Bet your bottom dollar. Now he can’t even acknowledge the encounter. And he is going to need his coconsprator to parrot this.
 
I try sometimes, but you're really a waste of time to engage most of the time. Such an extreme hyper-partisan perspective. It has some value on the board, but can be tiring and useless to engage.

You can't even acknowledge the most basic facts and definitions.

The only thing you try to do is look like a partisan shill. That's it. When your lies get challenged, you cry like a little baby and deflect. There is NOTHING hyper partisan about my comments and a challenge you to prove that asinine claim. My posts are always focused on the facts and the truth. Nothing more. Prove otherwise.

When it comes to you, your pretentious bullshit gets exposed by your continued deflections, goal post moving and lying. I will ask again; why wait forty years to come forward? Why didn't this come up when it occurred? Why didn't this come up in his 2006 confirmation? Why now?
 
The bolded ignores the stats. Many victims of assault take years to speak up, and some never come out at all.

I love the "backfire on Democrats." They're not doing anything except for saying she should be heard. Oooh.

Stop with the "many victims take years to speak up"

So tell me, if Kavanaugh were never tapped to be on the Supreme Court would she have stayed silent?

Why didn't she come forward in 2003?

What was so magical about now?

Let me guess, she is so fearful for other women she just had to come forward? Is that the story? That is what we are supposed to believe? Come on this is even tough bullshit for you to sling
 
That's all that has to be done here. It's useless for all of us to talk about it as much as we do.

Let's hear them, and the committee members can decide if it deserves to be considered, and how much weight to give it.

So we should stop posting here? STFU....seriously.
 
they have no choice. #metoo would eat them up alive if they tried to stop any testimony.
it's the single mos tpowerful force out there that can bring down anyone just by accusation

So your point is that Trump and Conway are lying their asses off.
 
Stop with the "many victims take years to speak up"

So tell me, if Kavanaugh were never tapped to be on the Supreme Court would she have stayed silent?

Why didn't she come forward in 2003?

What was so magical about now?

Let me guess, she is so fearful for other women she just had to come forward? Is that the story? That is what we are supposed to believe? Come on this is even tough bullshit for you to sling

It's really not a mystery, at all. There is nothing suspicious about this timing.

We're talking about the Supreme Court, a body that has incredible say over certain aspects of women's rights.

It's the same with Hill. It's not some weird coincidence, or "why did she wait until now" suspicion. It's almost impossible how obvious it is.
 
The bolded ignores the stats. Many victims of assault take years to speak up, and some never come out at all.

This isn't about victimization; this is about partisan political hit jobs.

I love the "backfire on Democrats." They're not doing anything except for saying she should be heard. Oooh.

They have gone well beyond merely saying she should be heard you dishonest hack. This is why everyone who engages you eventually just points at you and laughs. You want to pretend this isn't a Democratic tactic to delay the vote until after November.

You want to pretend that this letter wasn't available to the committee THREE months ago. You want to pretend that this harpy only came forward because she wanted the truth to be told. STFU, seriously.
 
The fact that he did not succeed in finalizing the rape presents a problem for them. If he had, they would say it was consensual. Bet your bottom dollar. Now he can’t even acknowledge the encounter. And he is going to need his coconsprator to parrot this.

What would a lying hyper partisan dumbass like you know about facts? STFU, seriously.
 
The fact that he did not succeed in finalizing the rape presents a problem for them. If he had, they would say it was consensual. Bet your bottom dollar. Now he can’t even acknowledge the encounter. And he is going to need his coconsprator to parrot this.

other people were at the party

the two male teens were drunk as fuck

Kav was in a club in high school whos aim was to drink 100 kegs that year


he was bad boying that year

rape is for bad boys

I have known a lot of teen boys over my life time


most don't try to rape girls


those that think its a normal teen boy mistake very likely are not like most
 
Back
Top