Kavanaugh is about to get the Merick Garland treatment!

LV426 said:
I'm all for it. And while we're at it, subpoena all 65 of those women who supposedly signed that "Brett-is-a-good-guy-no-really-believe-me-er,um-believe-these-women-I-just-made-up".
Click to expand...
Not necessary...just let her tell her tale....
 
TOP said:
Not necessary...just let her tell her tale....
Click to expand...

See, I disagree...

I think we need to explore how the GOP shit all over this process; how they held back exculpatory information; how they concocted a defense pre-hoc of their nominee; how they're still holding back e-mails from his time in the Bush the Dumber White House...

Bringing those "65 women" to testify will undoubtedly reveal the GOP fraud during this process.
 
LV426 said:
See, I disagree...

I think we need to explore how the GOP shit all over this process; how they held back exculpatory information; how they concocted a defense pre-hoc of their nominee; how they're still holding back e-mails from his time in the Bush the Dumber White House...

Bringing those "65 women" to testify will undoubtedly reveal the GOP fraud during this process.
Click to expand...
What's fraudulent?
 
LV426 said:
See, I disagree...

I think we need to explore how the GOP shit all over this process; how they held back exculpatory information; how they concocted a defense pre-hoc of their nominee; how they're still holding back e-mails from his time in the Bush the Dumber White House...

Bringing those "65 women" to testify will undoubtedly reveal the GOP fraud during this process.
Click to expand...

are you still in this thread nut-bag

I thought we disqualified your opinion from here on out.
wtf is wrong with you?

"why don't we bring those 65 women in to testify"

and then why don't we bring in 65 more to testify that these 65 women are not credible because they beat up a gay girl in grade school, and then another 65 to testify that the gay girl asked for it.

If we lived in nut-bag world with you, just like with the Mueller investigation we can just keep supeonoing people until someone says something we like, then spend 14 news cycles talking about it, until you find something else.

you are what is wrong with nut-bag world, you're the friggin flag bearer.

Your opinion means nothing, don't you get it
 
Getin the ring said:
and then why don't we bring in 65 more to testify that these 65 women are not credible because they beat up a gay girl in grade school, and then another 65 to testify that the gay girl asked for it.
Click to expand...

It doesn't seem like these 65 women Grassley found even exist, or that most of them were aware they had signed this document (that had no signatures, just names).

So if Grassley forged that, then that pretty much invalidates Brett's entire candidacy and the GOP's actions during this process.
 
Getin the ring said:
If we lived in nut-bag world with you, just like with the Mueller investigation we can just keep supeonoing people until someone says something we like, then spend 14 news cycles talking about it, until you find something else.
Click to expand...

So far, Mueller has secured guilty pleas of:

Trump's personal lawyer
Trump's campaign chair
Trump's national security adviser
Trump's campaign chair's #2
One of Trump's foreign policy advisers

Mueller also secured $46M in asset forfeiture, surpassing the $22M Trump says the Special Counsel costs. All 5 guilty witches are cooperating.

So not only is Mueller catching a ton of witches, he's also doing what no Republican has ever done; provide a surplus.
 
LV426 said:
So far, Mueller has secured guilty pleas of:

Trump's personal lawyer
Trump's campaign chair
Trump's national security adviser
Trump's campaign chair's #2
One of Trump's foreign policy advisers

Mueller also secured $46M in asset forfeiture, surpassing the $22M Trump says the Special Counsel costs. All 5 guilty witches are cooperating.
Click to expand...

And all totally unrelated to what he is suppose to be investigating.

Are you catching on, or have you stopped talking long enough to read
 
TOP said:
What was "withheld" and forged?
Click to expand...

Withheld: In addition to this specific accusation that the GOP knew about (hence, why there's a letter of '65 women'), there's also the 96% of docs from Brett's time as a Bush the Dumber toady that the GOP is holding from everyone.

Forged: Obviously, this letter of '65 women' was forged. That's why there's no signatures on the document, and why none of the '65 women' were called to testify.


Just let her tell her tale and prove it.
Click to expand...

Because this isn't about merely Ford anymore, this is about how the GOP actively and deliberately tried to hide information on their nominee, and quite possibly the fraudulent lengths they went to do so, like forging a document of support from '65 women'.
 
Getin the ring said:
And all totally unrelated to what he is suppose to be investigating.
Click to expand...

According to you?

You're clearly not the best judge when it comes to this shit.

But it's all good...I expect you to delete this account once Trump is removed from office or impeached and create a brand new one where you get to rebrand yourself for a third time in ten years.
 
LV426 said:
Withheld: In addition to this specific accusation that the GOP knew about (hence, why there's a letter of '65 women'), there's also the 96% of docs from Brett's time as a Bush the Dumber toady that the GOP is holding from everyone.

Forged: Obviously, this letter of '65 women' was forged. That's why there's no signatures on the document, and why none of the '65 women' were called to testify.




Because this isn't about merely Ford anymore, this is about how the GOP actively and deliberately tried to hide information on their nominee, and quite possibly the fraudulent lengths they went to do so, like forging a document of support from '65 women'.
Click to expand...

are you braindead? that's a serious question.

these women have been all over the airwaves since Frankenstein made her 11th hour prayer
 
Irthriuth said:
jeff toobin from cnn was talking about it in 2012.

if you believe her, then why are you against the dems doing this? you contradict your own statements, you are scatterbrained and all over the place. It shows you type from emotion and feels rather than anything logical. get your act together

oh yeah and her mom had her house foreclosed on in 1996... guess which other persons mom was the presiding judge during that case?
Click to expand...

Please show me a cite where her house was actually foreclosed...?
 
LV426 said:
Withheld: In addition to this specific accusation that the GOP knew about (hence, why there's a letter of '65 women'), there's also the 96% of docs from Brett's time as a Bush the Dumber toady that the GOP is holding from everyone.

Forged: Obviously, this letter of '65 women' was forged. That's why there's no signatures on the document, and why none of the '65 women' were called to testify.




Because this isn't about merely Ford anymore, this is about how the GOP actively and deliberately tried to hide information on their nominee, and quite possibly the fraudulent lengths they went to do so, like forging a document of support from '65 women'.
Click to expand...
OK...Good luck;)Let's ee if your dreams come true...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top